Comparison between femoral block and PENG block in femoral neck fractures: A cohort study.
<h4>Background</h4>Regional analgesia is worth performing in the multimodal postoperative management of hip fracture (HF) because it reduces hospital morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and side effects of the recently described "Pericapsular Ne...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/bf8d304c3fdb47a2aaaec12fc35f5ba4 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:bf8d304c3fdb47a2aaaec12fc35f5ba4 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:bf8d304c3fdb47a2aaaec12fc35f5ba42021-12-02T20:07:17ZComparison between femoral block and PENG block in femoral neck fractures: A cohort study.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0252716https://doaj.org/article/bf8d304c3fdb47a2aaaec12fc35f5ba42021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252716https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background</h4>Regional analgesia is worth performing in the multimodal postoperative management of hip fracture (HF) because it reduces hospital morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and side effects of the recently described "Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block" with those of the femoral block, which is considered the standard of care for postoperative pain control after femoral neck fracture.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>We conducted a comparative observational study at a university hospital (Saint Antoine Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France), where the PENG block was introduced in August 2019. We include all patients from June to October 2019, who were coming for femoral neck fractures and who had an analgesic femoral block or PENG block before their surgery. The primary outcome was the comparison of cumulative postoperative morphine consumption 48 hours after surgery.<h4>Results</h4>Demographics, medical charts, and perioperative data of 42 patients were reviewed: 21 patients before (Femoral group) and 21 patients after the introduction of PENG block (PENG group) in clinical practice. Thirteen total hip arthroplasties (THA) and eight hemi arthroplasties (HA) were included in each group. Demographics were also comparable. The median, postoperative, morphine equivalent consumption at 48 hours was 10 [0-20] mg and 20 [0-50] mg in Femoral and PENG groups respectively (p = 0.458). No statistically significant differences were found in postoperative pain intensity, time to ambulation, incidence of morphine-related side effects, or length of hospital stay. The postoperative muscle strength of the quadriceps was greater in the PENG group than in the Femoral group (5/5 vs. 2/5, p = 0.001).<h4>Conclusion</h4>In the management of hip fractures, PENG block is not associated in our study with a significant change in postoperative morphine consumption, compared to femoral block. However, it does significantly improve the immediate mobility of the operated limb, making it appropriate for inclusion in enhanced recovery programs after surgery.Céline AllardEmmanuel PardoChristophe de la JonquièreAnne WynieckiAnne SoulierAnnibal FaddoulEileen S TsaiFrancis BonnetFranck VerdonkPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 6, p e0252716 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Céline Allard Emmanuel Pardo Christophe de la Jonquière Anne Wyniecki Anne Soulier Annibal Faddoul Eileen S Tsai Francis Bonnet Franck Verdonk Comparison between femoral block and PENG block in femoral neck fractures: A cohort study. |
description |
<h4>Background</h4>Regional analgesia is worth performing in the multimodal postoperative management of hip fracture (HF) because it reduces hospital morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and side effects of the recently described "Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block" with those of the femoral block, which is considered the standard of care for postoperative pain control after femoral neck fracture.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>We conducted a comparative observational study at a university hospital (Saint Antoine Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France), where the PENG block was introduced in August 2019. We include all patients from June to October 2019, who were coming for femoral neck fractures and who had an analgesic femoral block or PENG block before their surgery. The primary outcome was the comparison of cumulative postoperative morphine consumption 48 hours after surgery.<h4>Results</h4>Demographics, medical charts, and perioperative data of 42 patients were reviewed: 21 patients before (Femoral group) and 21 patients after the introduction of PENG block (PENG group) in clinical practice. Thirteen total hip arthroplasties (THA) and eight hemi arthroplasties (HA) were included in each group. Demographics were also comparable. The median, postoperative, morphine equivalent consumption at 48 hours was 10 [0-20] mg and 20 [0-50] mg in Femoral and PENG groups respectively (p = 0.458). No statistically significant differences were found in postoperative pain intensity, time to ambulation, incidence of morphine-related side effects, or length of hospital stay. The postoperative muscle strength of the quadriceps was greater in the PENG group than in the Femoral group (5/5 vs. 2/5, p = 0.001).<h4>Conclusion</h4>In the management of hip fractures, PENG block is not associated in our study with a significant change in postoperative morphine consumption, compared to femoral block. However, it does significantly improve the immediate mobility of the operated limb, making it appropriate for inclusion in enhanced recovery programs after surgery. |
format |
article |
author |
Céline Allard Emmanuel Pardo Christophe de la Jonquière Anne Wyniecki Anne Soulier Annibal Faddoul Eileen S Tsai Francis Bonnet Franck Verdonk |
author_facet |
Céline Allard Emmanuel Pardo Christophe de la Jonquière Anne Wyniecki Anne Soulier Annibal Faddoul Eileen S Tsai Francis Bonnet Franck Verdonk |
author_sort |
Céline Allard |
title |
Comparison between femoral block and PENG block in femoral neck fractures: A cohort study. |
title_short |
Comparison between femoral block and PENG block in femoral neck fractures: A cohort study. |
title_full |
Comparison between femoral block and PENG block in femoral neck fractures: A cohort study. |
title_fullStr |
Comparison between femoral block and PENG block in femoral neck fractures: A cohort study. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison between femoral block and PENG block in femoral neck fractures: A cohort study. |
title_sort |
comparison between femoral block and peng block in femoral neck fractures: a cohort study. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/bf8d304c3fdb47a2aaaec12fc35f5ba4 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT celineallard comparisonbetweenfemoralblockandpengblockinfemoralneckfracturesacohortstudy AT emmanuelpardo comparisonbetweenfemoralblockandpengblockinfemoralneckfracturesacohortstudy AT christophedelajonquiere comparisonbetweenfemoralblockandpengblockinfemoralneckfracturesacohortstudy AT annewyniecki comparisonbetweenfemoralblockandpengblockinfemoralneckfracturesacohortstudy AT annesoulier comparisonbetweenfemoralblockandpengblockinfemoralneckfracturesacohortstudy AT annibalfaddoul comparisonbetweenfemoralblockandpengblockinfemoralneckfracturesacohortstudy AT eileenstsai comparisonbetweenfemoralblockandpengblockinfemoralneckfracturesacohortstudy AT francisbonnet comparisonbetweenfemoralblockandpengblockinfemoralneckfracturesacohortstudy AT franckverdonk comparisonbetweenfemoralblockandpengblockinfemoralneckfracturesacohortstudy |
_version_ |
1718375326378098688 |