Comparison between femoral block and PENG block in femoral neck fractures: A cohort study.

<h4>Background</h4>Regional analgesia is worth performing in the multimodal postoperative management of hip fracture (HF) because it reduces hospital morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and side effects of the recently described "Pericapsular Ne...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Céline Allard, Emmanuel Pardo, Christophe de la Jonquière, Anne Wyniecki, Anne Soulier, Annibal Faddoul, Eileen S Tsai, Francis Bonnet, Franck Verdonk
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/bf8d304c3fdb47a2aaaec12fc35f5ba4
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:bf8d304c3fdb47a2aaaec12fc35f5ba4
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:bf8d304c3fdb47a2aaaec12fc35f5ba42021-12-02T20:07:17ZComparison between femoral block and PENG block in femoral neck fractures: A cohort study.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0252716https://doaj.org/article/bf8d304c3fdb47a2aaaec12fc35f5ba42021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252716https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background</h4>Regional analgesia is worth performing in the multimodal postoperative management of hip fracture (HF) because it reduces hospital morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and side effects of the recently described "Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block" with those of the femoral block, which is considered the standard of care for postoperative pain control after femoral neck fracture.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>We conducted a comparative observational study at a university hospital (Saint Antoine Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France), where the PENG block was introduced in August 2019. We include all patients from June to October 2019, who were coming for femoral neck fractures and who had an analgesic femoral block or PENG block before their surgery. The primary outcome was the comparison of cumulative postoperative morphine consumption 48 hours after surgery.<h4>Results</h4>Demographics, medical charts, and perioperative data of 42 patients were reviewed: 21 patients before (Femoral group) and 21 patients after the introduction of PENG block (PENG group) in clinical practice. Thirteen total hip arthroplasties (THA) and eight hemi arthroplasties (HA) were included in each group. Demographics were also comparable. The median, postoperative, morphine equivalent consumption at 48 hours was 10 [0-20] mg and 20 [0-50] mg in Femoral and PENG groups respectively (p = 0.458). No statistically significant differences were found in postoperative pain intensity, time to ambulation, incidence of morphine-related side effects, or length of hospital stay. The postoperative muscle strength of the quadriceps was greater in the PENG group than in the Femoral group (5/5 vs. 2/5, p = 0.001).<h4>Conclusion</h4>In the management of hip fractures, PENG block is not associated in our study with a significant change in postoperative morphine consumption, compared to femoral block. However, it does significantly improve the immediate mobility of the operated limb, making it appropriate for inclusion in enhanced recovery programs after surgery.Céline AllardEmmanuel PardoChristophe de la JonquièreAnne WynieckiAnne SoulierAnnibal FaddoulEileen S TsaiFrancis BonnetFranck VerdonkPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 6, p e0252716 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Céline Allard
Emmanuel Pardo
Christophe de la Jonquière
Anne Wyniecki
Anne Soulier
Annibal Faddoul
Eileen S Tsai
Francis Bonnet
Franck Verdonk
Comparison between femoral block and PENG block in femoral neck fractures: A cohort study.
description <h4>Background</h4>Regional analgesia is worth performing in the multimodal postoperative management of hip fracture (HF) because it reduces hospital morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and side effects of the recently described "Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block" with those of the femoral block, which is considered the standard of care for postoperative pain control after femoral neck fracture.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>We conducted a comparative observational study at a university hospital (Saint Antoine Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France), where the PENG block was introduced in August 2019. We include all patients from June to October 2019, who were coming for femoral neck fractures and who had an analgesic femoral block or PENG block before their surgery. The primary outcome was the comparison of cumulative postoperative morphine consumption 48 hours after surgery.<h4>Results</h4>Demographics, medical charts, and perioperative data of 42 patients were reviewed: 21 patients before (Femoral group) and 21 patients after the introduction of PENG block (PENG group) in clinical practice. Thirteen total hip arthroplasties (THA) and eight hemi arthroplasties (HA) were included in each group. Demographics were also comparable. The median, postoperative, morphine equivalent consumption at 48 hours was 10 [0-20] mg and 20 [0-50] mg in Femoral and PENG groups respectively (p = 0.458). No statistically significant differences were found in postoperative pain intensity, time to ambulation, incidence of morphine-related side effects, or length of hospital stay. The postoperative muscle strength of the quadriceps was greater in the PENG group than in the Femoral group (5/5 vs. 2/5, p = 0.001).<h4>Conclusion</h4>In the management of hip fractures, PENG block is not associated in our study with a significant change in postoperative morphine consumption, compared to femoral block. However, it does significantly improve the immediate mobility of the operated limb, making it appropriate for inclusion in enhanced recovery programs after surgery.
format article
author Céline Allard
Emmanuel Pardo
Christophe de la Jonquière
Anne Wyniecki
Anne Soulier
Annibal Faddoul
Eileen S Tsai
Francis Bonnet
Franck Verdonk
author_facet Céline Allard
Emmanuel Pardo
Christophe de la Jonquière
Anne Wyniecki
Anne Soulier
Annibal Faddoul
Eileen S Tsai
Francis Bonnet
Franck Verdonk
author_sort Céline Allard
title Comparison between femoral block and PENG block in femoral neck fractures: A cohort study.
title_short Comparison between femoral block and PENG block in femoral neck fractures: A cohort study.
title_full Comparison between femoral block and PENG block in femoral neck fractures: A cohort study.
title_fullStr Comparison between femoral block and PENG block in femoral neck fractures: A cohort study.
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between femoral block and PENG block in femoral neck fractures: A cohort study.
title_sort comparison between femoral block and peng block in femoral neck fractures: a cohort study.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/bf8d304c3fdb47a2aaaec12fc35f5ba4
work_keys_str_mv AT celineallard comparisonbetweenfemoralblockandpengblockinfemoralneckfracturesacohortstudy
AT emmanuelpardo comparisonbetweenfemoralblockandpengblockinfemoralneckfracturesacohortstudy
AT christophedelajonquiere comparisonbetweenfemoralblockandpengblockinfemoralneckfracturesacohortstudy
AT annewyniecki comparisonbetweenfemoralblockandpengblockinfemoralneckfracturesacohortstudy
AT annesoulier comparisonbetweenfemoralblockandpengblockinfemoralneckfracturesacohortstudy
AT annibalfaddoul comparisonbetweenfemoralblockandpengblockinfemoralneckfracturesacohortstudy
AT eileenstsai comparisonbetweenfemoralblockandpengblockinfemoralneckfracturesacohortstudy
AT francisbonnet comparisonbetweenfemoralblockandpengblockinfemoralneckfracturesacohortstudy
AT franckverdonk comparisonbetweenfemoralblockandpengblockinfemoralneckfracturesacohortstudy
_version_ 1718375326378098688