La gouvernance conflictuelle relative à la cogestion des saumons dans le bassin du fleuve Columbia (États-Unis)

In the U.S. portion of the Columbia Basin, salmon populations are five times lower than 150 years ago. They are co-managed by federal, state and tribal protagonists in order to restore them. On this territory larger than France, the federal government dominates the governance relating to the co-mana...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Nicolas Barbier
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	FR
Publicado:	Éditions en environnement VertigO 2013
Materias:	governance co-management salmon Columbia basin river Environmental sciences GE1-350
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/bfab2390f02e4cc5864dfd72129ae4a3
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:bfab2390f02e4cc5864dfd72129ae4a3
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:bfab2390f02e4cc5864dfd72129ae4a32021-12-02T10:00:22ZLa gouvernance conflictuelle relative à la cogestion des saumons dans le bassin du fleuve Columbia (États-Unis)1492-844210.4000/vertigo.14412https://doaj.org/article/bfab2390f02e4cc5864dfd72129ae4a32013-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://journals.openedition.org/vertigo/14412https://doaj.org/toc/1492-8442In the U.S. portion of the Columbia Basin, salmon populations are five times lower than 150 years ago. They are co-managed by federal, state and tribal protagonists in order to restore them. On this territory larger than France, the federal government dominates the governance relating to the co-management of endangered and threatened species of salmon. The NOAA Fisheries Service writes up recovery plans and biological opinions that guide the actions on the ground. State and tribal agencies carry out multiple tasks on the ground, including the reintroduction of local salmon populations, the restoration of riparian areas, the management of salmon hatcheries or the enforcement of fishing rules. At the same time, a federal court in Oregon has authority to change the federal plans and biological opinions if the latter do not comply with the 1973 Endangered Species Act. During the 2000s, this court notably contributed to reduce the lethal impact of dams on salmon. If some local salmon populations have been partially restored, major problems remain unresolved : large dams keep hindering the overall recovery, just like continuing pollution and environmental degradation in parts of watersheds. Conflicts of interest between different groups go on. Environmental and fishing groups as well as Indian tribes call for more ambitious recovery targets. They come up against major agricultural and industrial interests generally protected by federal and state governments. These two governmental protagonists are opposed to the development of elements of tribal projects related to salmon hatcheries. The adoption of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples by the Obama administration in 2010 could defuse conflicts and bring about changes in the governance.Nicolas Barbier Éditions en environnement VertigOarticlegovernanceco-managementsalmonColumbiabasinriverEnvironmental sciencesGE1-350FRVertigO, Vol 13, Iss 3 (2013)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	FR
topic	governance co-management salmon Columbia basin river Environmental sciences GE1-350
spellingShingle	governance co-management salmon Columbia basin river Environmental sciences GE1-350 Nicolas Barbier La gouvernance conflictuelle relative à la cogestion des saumons dans le bassin du fleuve Columbia (États-Unis)
description	In the U.S. portion of the Columbia Basin, salmon populations are five times lower than 150 years ago. They are co-managed by federal, state and tribal protagonists in order to restore them. On this territory larger than France, the federal government dominates the governance relating to the co-management of endangered and threatened species of salmon. The NOAA Fisheries Service writes up recovery plans and biological opinions that guide the actions on the ground. State and tribal agencies carry out multiple tasks on the ground, including the reintroduction of local salmon populations, the restoration of riparian areas, the management of salmon hatcheries or the enforcement of fishing rules. At the same time, a federal court in Oregon has authority to change the federal plans and biological opinions if the latter do not comply with the 1973 Endangered Species Act. During the 2000s, this court notably contributed to reduce the lethal impact of dams on salmon. If some local salmon populations have been partially restored, major problems remain unresolved : large dams keep hindering the overall recovery, just like continuing pollution and environmental degradation in parts of watersheds. Conflicts of interest between different groups go on. Environmental and fishing groups as well as Indian tribes call for more ambitious recovery targets. They come up against major agricultural and industrial interests generally protected by federal and state governments. These two governmental protagonists are opposed to the development of elements of tribal projects related to salmon hatcheries. The adoption of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples by the Obama administration in 2010 could defuse conflicts and bring about changes in the governance.
format	article
author	Nicolas Barbier
author_facet	Nicolas Barbier
author_sort	Nicolas Barbier
title	La gouvernance conflictuelle relative à la cogestion des saumons dans le bassin du fleuve Columbia (États-Unis)
title_short	La gouvernance conflictuelle relative à la cogestion des saumons dans le bassin du fleuve Columbia (États-Unis)
title_full	La gouvernance conflictuelle relative à la cogestion des saumons dans le bassin du fleuve Columbia (États-Unis)
title_fullStr	La gouvernance conflictuelle relative à la cogestion des saumons dans le bassin du fleuve Columbia (États-Unis)
title_full_unstemmed	La gouvernance conflictuelle relative à la cogestion des saumons dans le bassin du fleuve Columbia (États-Unis)
title_sort	la gouvernance conflictuelle relative à la cogestion des saumons dans le bassin du fleuve columbia (états-unis)
publisher	Éditions en environnement VertigO
publishDate	2013
url	https://doaj.org/article/bfab2390f02e4cc5864dfd72129ae4a3
work_keys_str_mv	AT nicolasbarbier lagouvernanceconflictuellerelativealacogestiondessaumonsdanslebassindufleuvecolumbiaetatsunis
_version_	1718397823918014464

La gouvernance conflictuelle relative à la cogestion des saumons dans le bassin du fleuve Columbia (États-Unis)

Ejemplares similares