The inclusion of prefixal material in Zulu reduplication

The aim of this paper is twofold: to introduce new data that show reduplication in Zulu admits inflectional morphemes to the left of the verb stem rather than within the stem on the right, and to give an analysis of Zulu reduplication that does not require access to underlying morphosyntactic struct...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Toni Cook
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
FR
Publicado: LibraryPress@UF 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/c016c254dae6401a9b43ec8048278a58
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:c016c254dae6401a9b43ec8048278a58
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:c016c254dae6401a9b43ec8048278a582021-11-19T03:52:01ZThe inclusion of prefixal material in Zulu reduplication10.32473/sal.v47i1.1076530039-35332154-428Xhttps://doaj.org/article/c016c254dae6401a9b43ec8048278a582018-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.flvc.org/sal/article/view/107653https://doaj.org/toc/0039-3533https://doaj.org/toc/2154-428XThe aim of this paper is twofold: to introduce new data that show reduplication in Zulu admits inflectional morphemes to the left of the verb stem rather than within the stem on the right, and to give an analysis of Zulu reduplication that does not require access to underlying morphosyntactic structure. Instead, reduplication is a template-filling copying operation that interacts with linear phonological structures and does not target morphosyntactic objects. The data presented here argue for an analysis in which the crucial distinction is between morphemes within the scope of reduplication and those outside it; the left/right asymmetry in the appearance of inflectional morphemes in the reduplicant is attributable to a process of Local Dislocation (Embick 2007). Reduplication is treated as a copying operation that has indirect access only to morphosyntactic structure through phonological operations. Consequently, reified subconstituents of the verb complex, such as the Macrostem (Hyman, Inkelas, and Sibanda 2009), are not accessible as such to the process of reduplication. However, data from VCV stems show that morphosyntactic structure affects reduplication in certain constructions. Tonal data is used to show that the “prefixal” affiliation of prefixal morphemes is voided if these morphemes are reduplicated.Toni CookLibraryPress@UFarticleZulumorphosyntaxreduplicationPhilology. LinguisticsP1-1091ENFRStudies in African Linguistics, Vol 47, Iss 1 (2018)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
FR
topic Zulu
morphosyntax
reduplication
Philology. Linguistics
P1-1091
spellingShingle Zulu
morphosyntax
reduplication
Philology. Linguistics
P1-1091
Toni Cook
The inclusion of prefixal material in Zulu reduplication
description The aim of this paper is twofold: to introduce new data that show reduplication in Zulu admits inflectional morphemes to the left of the verb stem rather than within the stem on the right, and to give an analysis of Zulu reduplication that does not require access to underlying morphosyntactic structure. Instead, reduplication is a template-filling copying operation that interacts with linear phonological structures and does not target morphosyntactic objects. The data presented here argue for an analysis in which the crucial distinction is between morphemes within the scope of reduplication and those outside it; the left/right asymmetry in the appearance of inflectional morphemes in the reduplicant is attributable to a process of Local Dislocation (Embick 2007). Reduplication is treated as a copying operation that has indirect access only to morphosyntactic structure through phonological operations. Consequently, reified subconstituents of the verb complex, such as the Macrostem (Hyman, Inkelas, and Sibanda 2009), are not accessible as such to the process of reduplication. However, data from VCV stems show that morphosyntactic structure affects reduplication in certain constructions. Tonal data is used to show that the “prefixal” affiliation of prefixal morphemes is voided if these morphemes are reduplicated.
format article
author Toni Cook
author_facet Toni Cook
author_sort Toni Cook
title The inclusion of prefixal material in Zulu reduplication
title_short The inclusion of prefixal material in Zulu reduplication
title_full The inclusion of prefixal material in Zulu reduplication
title_fullStr The inclusion of prefixal material in Zulu reduplication
title_full_unstemmed The inclusion of prefixal material in Zulu reduplication
title_sort inclusion of prefixal material in zulu reduplication
publisher LibraryPress@UF
publishDate 2018
url https://doaj.org/article/c016c254dae6401a9b43ec8048278a58
work_keys_str_mv AT tonicook theinclusionofprefixalmaterialinzulureduplication
AT tonicook inclusionofprefixalmaterialinzulureduplication
_version_ 1718420632720375808