What Metalinguistic Negotiations Can’t Do
Philosophers of language and metaethicists are concerned with persistent normative and evaluative disagreements – how can we explain persistent intelligible disagreements in spite of agreement over the described facts? Tim Sundell recently argued that evaluative aesthetic and personal taste dispute...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN FR IT |
| Publicado: |
Rosenberg & Sellier
2017
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/c09712185bfd4d8c8d7b2e83dc3a20f3 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:doaj.org-article:c09712185bfd4d8c8d7b2e83dc3a20f3 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:c09712185bfd4d8c8d7b2e83dc3a20f32021-12-02T05:46:36ZWhat Metalinguistic Negotiations Can’t Do10.13128/Phe_Mi-211042280-78532239-4028https://doaj.org/article/c09712185bfd4d8c8d7b2e83dc3a20f32017-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://oaj.fupress.net/index.php/pam/article/view/7264https://doaj.org/toc/2280-7853https://doaj.org/toc/2239-4028 Philosophers of language and metaethicists are concerned with persistent normative and evaluative disagreements – how can we explain persistent intelligible disagreements in spite of agreement over the described facts? Tim Sundell recently argued that evaluative aesthetic and personal taste disputes could be explained as metalinguistic negotiations – conversations where interlocutors negotiate how best to use a word relative to a context. I argue here that metalinguistic negotiations are neither necessary nor sufficient for genuine evaluative and normative disputes to occur. A comprehensive account of value talk requires stronger metanormative commitments than metalinguistic negotiations afford. Teresa MarquesRosenberg & Sellierarticlemetalinguistic negotiationevaluative disagreementverbal disputesAestheticsBH1-301EthicsBJ1-1725ENFRITPhenomenology and Mind, Iss 12 (2017) |
| institution |
DOAJ |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
EN FR IT |
| topic |
metalinguistic negotiation evaluative disagreement verbal disputes Aesthetics BH1-301 Ethics BJ1-1725 |
| spellingShingle |
metalinguistic negotiation evaluative disagreement verbal disputes Aesthetics BH1-301 Ethics BJ1-1725 Teresa Marques What Metalinguistic Negotiations Can’t Do |
| description |
Philosophers of language and metaethicists are concerned with persistent normative and evaluative disagreements – how can we explain persistent intelligible disagreements in spite of agreement over the described facts? Tim Sundell recently argued that evaluative aesthetic and personal taste disputes could be explained as metalinguistic negotiations – conversations where interlocutors negotiate how best to use a word relative to a context. I argue here that metalinguistic negotiations are neither necessary nor sufficient for genuine evaluative and normative disputes to occur. A comprehensive account of value talk requires stronger metanormative commitments than metalinguistic negotiations afford.
|
| format |
article |
| author |
Teresa Marques |
| author_facet |
Teresa Marques |
| author_sort |
Teresa Marques |
| title |
What Metalinguistic Negotiations Can’t Do |
| title_short |
What Metalinguistic Negotiations Can’t Do |
| title_full |
What Metalinguistic Negotiations Can’t Do |
| title_fullStr |
What Metalinguistic Negotiations Can’t Do |
| title_full_unstemmed |
What Metalinguistic Negotiations Can’t Do |
| title_sort |
what metalinguistic negotiations can’t do |
| publisher |
Rosenberg & Sellier |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/c09712185bfd4d8c8d7b2e83dc3a20f3 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT teresamarques whatmetalinguisticnegotiationscantdo |
| _version_ |
1718400255867748352 |