What Metalinguistic Negotiations Can’t Do
Philosophers of language and metaethicists are concerned with persistent normative and evaluative disagreements – how can we explain persistent intelligible disagreements in spite of agreement over the described facts? Tim Sundell recently argued that evaluative aesthetic and personal taste dispute...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | Teresa Marques |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN FR IT |
Publicado: |
Rosenberg & Sellier
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/c09712185bfd4d8c8d7b2e83dc3a20f3 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Contextualist Answers to the Challenge from Disagreement
por: Dan Zeman
Publicado: (2017) -
Slurs and Negation
por: Francesca Panzeri, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
The Methods of Ethics
por: Roger Crisp
Publicado: (2019) -
The Social Bases of Self-Respect. Political Equality and Epistemic Injustice
por: Federica Liveriero
Publicado: (2019) -
Baker’s First-Person Perspectives: They Are Not What They Seem
por: Marc Andree Weber
Publicado: (2016)