What Metalinguistic Negotiations Can’t Do
Philosophers of language and metaethicists are concerned with persistent normative and evaluative disagreements – how can we explain persistent intelligible disagreements in spite of agreement over the described facts? Tim Sundell recently argued that evaluative aesthetic and personal taste dispute...
Enregistré dans:
Auteur principal: | Teresa Marques |
---|---|
Format: | article |
Langue: | EN FR IT |
Publié: |
Rosenberg & Sellier
2017
|
Sujets: | |
Accès en ligne: | https://doaj.org/article/c09712185bfd4d8c8d7b2e83dc3a20f3 |
Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
Documents similaires
-
Contextualist Answers to the Challenge from Disagreement
par: Dan Zeman
Publié: (2017) -
Slurs and Negation
par: Francesca Panzeri, et autres
Publié: (2017) -
The Methods of Ethics
par: Roger Crisp
Publié: (2019) -
The Social Bases of Self-Respect. Political Equality and Epistemic Injustice
par: Federica Liveriero
Publié: (2019) -
Baker’s First-Person Perspectives: They Are Not What They Seem
par: Marc Andree Weber
Publié: (2016)