Low-Carbohydrate Diet among Children with Type 1 Diabetes: A Multi-Center Study

Aims/hypothesis: The proportion of children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) who have experience with low-carbohydrate diet (LCD) is unknown. Our goal was to map the frequency of LCD among children with T1D and to describe their clinical and laboratory data. Methods: Caregivers of 1040 children with T1D f...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vit Neuman, Lukas Plachy, Stepanka Pruhova, Stanislava Kolouskova, Lenka Petruzelkova, Barbora Obermannova, Jana Vyzralkova, Petra Konecna, Jan Vosahlo, Martina Romanova, Marketa Pavlikova, Zdenek Sumnik
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/c0c18c0ed2c442a9a1898c79b0910309
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Descripción
Sumario:Aims/hypothesis: The proportion of children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) who have experience with low-carbohydrate diet (LCD) is unknown. Our goal was to map the frequency of LCD among children with T1D and to describe their clinical and laboratory data. Methods: Caregivers of 1040 children with T1D from three centers were addressed with a structured questionnaire regarding the children’s carbohydrate intake and experience with LCD (daily energy intake from carbohydrates below 26% of age-recommended values). The subjects currently on LCD were compared to a group of non-LCD respondents matched to age, T1D duration, sex, type and center of treatment. Results: A total of 624/1040 (60%) of the subjects completed the survey. A total of 242/624 (39%) subjects reported experience with voluntary carbohydrate restriction with 36/624 (5.8%) subjects currently following the LCD. The LCD group had similar HbA1c (45 vs. 49.5, <i>p</i> = 0.11), lower average glycemia (7.0 vs. 7.9, <i>p</i> = 0.02), higher time in range (74 vs. 67%, <i>p</i> = 0.02), lower time in hyperglycemia >10 mmol/L (17 vs. 20%, <i>p</i> = 0.04), tendency to more time in hypoglycemia <3.9 mmol/L(8 vs. 5%, <i>p</i> = 0.05) and lower systolic blood pressure percentile (43 vs. 74, <i>p</i> = 0.03). The groups did not differ in their lipid profile nor in current body height, weight or BMI. The LCD was mostly initiated by the parents or the subjects themselves and only 39% of the families consulted their decision with the diabetologist. Conclusions/interpretation: Low carbohydrate diet is not scarce in children with T1D and is associated with modestly better disease control. At the same time, caution should be applied as it showed a tendency toward more frequent hypoglycemia.