Large-scale differences in microbial biodiversity discovery between 16S amplicon and shotgun sequencing

Abstract Modern metagenomic environmental DNA studies are almost completely reliant on next-generation sequencing, making evaluations of these methods critical. We compare two next-generation sequencing techniques – amplicon and shotgun – on water samples across four of Brazil’s major river floodpla...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Michael Tessler, Johannes S. Neumann, Ebrahim Afshinnekoo, Michael Pineda, Rebecca Hersch, Luiz Felipe M. Velho, Bianca T. Segovia, Fabio A. Lansac-Toha, Michael Lemke, Rob DeSalle, Christopher E. Mason, Mercer R. Brugler
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2017
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/c0d418682c534b8c8240e594db965069
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:c0d418682c534b8c8240e594db965069
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:c0d418682c534b8c8240e594db9650692021-12-02T12:32:38ZLarge-scale differences in microbial biodiversity discovery between 16S amplicon and shotgun sequencing10.1038/s41598-017-06665-32045-2322https://doaj.org/article/c0d418682c534b8c8240e594db9650692017-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06665-3https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Modern metagenomic environmental DNA studies are almost completely reliant on next-generation sequencing, making evaluations of these methods critical. We compare two next-generation sequencing techniques – amplicon and shotgun – on water samples across four of Brazil’s major river floodplain systems (Amazon, Araguaia, Paraná, and Pantanal). Less than 50% of phyla identified via amplicon sequencing were recovered from shotgun sequencing, clearly challenging the dogma that mid-depth shotgun recovers more diversity than amplicon-based approaches. Amplicon sequencing also revealed ~27% more families. Overall the amplicon data were more robust across both biodiversity and community ecology analyses at different taxonomic scales. Our work doubles the sampling size in similar environmental studies, and novelly integrates environmental data (e.g., pH, temperature, nutrients) from each site, revealing divergent correlations depending on which data are used. While myriad variants on NGS techniques and bioinformatic pipelines are available, our results point to core differences that have not been highlighted in any studies to date. Given the low number of taxa identified when coupling shotgun data with clade-based taxonomic algorithms, previous studies that quantified biodiversity using such bioinformatic tools should be viewed cautiously or re-analyzed. Nonetheless, shotgun has complementary advantages that should be weighed when designing projects.Michael TesslerJohannes S. NeumannEbrahim AfshinnekooMichael PinedaRebecca HerschLuiz Felipe M. VelhoBianca T. SegoviaFabio A. Lansac-TohaMichael LemkeRob DeSalleChristopher E. MasonMercer R. BruglerNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-14 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Michael Tessler
Johannes S. Neumann
Ebrahim Afshinnekoo
Michael Pineda
Rebecca Hersch
Luiz Felipe M. Velho
Bianca T. Segovia
Fabio A. Lansac-Toha
Michael Lemke
Rob DeSalle
Christopher E. Mason
Mercer R. Brugler
Large-scale differences in microbial biodiversity discovery between 16S amplicon and shotgun sequencing
description Abstract Modern metagenomic environmental DNA studies are almost completely reliant on next-generation sequencing, making evaluations of these methods critical. We compare two next-generation sequencing techniques – amplicon and shotgun – on water samples across four of Brazil’s major river floodplain systems (Amazon, Araguaia, Paraná, and Pantanal). Less than 50% of phyla identified via amplicon sequencing were recovered from shotgun sequencing, clearly challenging the dogma that mid-depth shotgun recovers more diversity than amplicon-based approaches. Amplicon sequencing also revealed ~27% more families. Overall the amplicon data were more robust across both biodiversity and community ecology analyses at different taxonomic scales. Our work doubles the sampling size in similar environmental studies, and novelly integrates environmental data (e.g., pH, temperature, nutrients) from each site, revealing divergent correlations depending on which data are used. While myriad variants on NGS techniques and bioinformatic pipelines are available, our results point to core differences that have not been highlighted in any studies to date. Given the low number of taxa identified when coupling shotgun data with clade-based taxonomic algorithms, previous studies that quantified biodiversity using such bioinformatic tools should be viewed cautiously or re-analyzed. Nonetheless, shotgun has complementary advantages that should be weighed when designing projects.
format article
author Michael Tessler
Johannes S. Neumann
Ebrahim Afshinnekoo
Michael Pineda
Rebecca Hersch
Luiz Felipe M. Velho
Bianca T. Segovia
Fabio A. Lansac-Toha
Michael Lemke
Rob DeSalle
Christopher E. Mason
Mercer R. Brugler
author_facet Michael Tessler
Johannes S. Neumann
Ebrahim Afshinnekoo
Michael Pineda
Rebecca Hersch
Luiz Felipe M. Velho
Bianca T. Segovia
Fabio A. Lansac-Toha
Michael Lemke
Rob DeSalle
Christopher E. Mason
Mercer R. Brugler
author_sort Michael Tessler
title Large-scale differences in microbial biodiversity discovery between 16S amplicon and shotgun sequencing
title_short Large-scale differences in microbial biodiversity discovery between 16S amplicon and shotgun sequencing
title_full Large-scale differences in microbial biodiversity discovery between 16S amplicon and shotgun sequencing
title_fullStr Large-scale differences in microbial biodiversity discovery between 16S amplicon and shotgun sequencing
title_full_unstemmed Large-scale differences in microbial biodiversity discovery between 16S amplicon and shotgun sequencing
title_sort large-scale differences in microbial biodiversity discovery between 16s amplicon and shotgun sequencing
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/c0d418682c534b8c8240e594db965069
work_keys_str_mv AT michaeltessler largescaledifferencesinmicrobialbiodiversitydiscoverybetween16sampliconandshotgunsequencing
AT johannessneumann largescaledifferencesinmicrobialbiodiversitydiscoverybetween16sampliconandshotgunsequencing
AT ebrahimafshinnekoo largescaledifferencesinmicrobialbiodiversitydiscoverybetween16sampliconandshotgunsequencing
AT michaelpineda largescaledifferencesinmicrobialbiodiversitydiscoverybetween16sampliconandshotgunsequencing
AT rebeccahersch largescaledifferencesinmicrobialbiodiversitydiscoverybetween16sampliconandshotgunsequencing
AT luizfelipemvelho largescaledifferencesinmicrobialbiodiversitydiscoverybetween16sampliconandshotgunsequencing
AT biancatsegovia largescaledifferencesinmicrobialbiodiversitydiscoverybetween16sampliconandshotgunsequencing
AT fabioalansactoha largescaledifferencesinmicrobialbiodiversitydiscoverybetween16sampliconandshotgunsequencing
AT michaellemke largescaledifferencesinmicrobialbiodiversitydiscoverybetween16sampliconandshotgunsequencing
AT robdesalle largescaledifferencesinmicrobialbiodiversitydiscoverybetween16sampliconandshotgunsequencing
AT christopheremason largescaledifferencesinmicrobialbiodiversitydiscoverybetween16sampliconandshotgunsequencing
AT mercerrbrugler largescaledifferencesinmicrobialbiodiversitydiscoverybetween16sampliconandshotgunsequencing
_version_ 1718394002986762240