Trends in Cognitive Function Among Chinese Elderly From 1998 to 2018: An Age-Period-Cohort Analysis

Objectives: To investigate the effects of age, period, and cohort (APC) on trends in cognitive function among the Chinese elderly, and to explore how gender gaps in cognitive function change with age, period, and cohort.Methods: This study used data from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Su...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiaoqian Hu, Shuyan Gu, Xuemei Zhen, Xueshan Sun, Yuxuan Gu, Hengjin Dong
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/c0f97ca7db0e4d96b51c4ad65df35a03
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:c0f97ca7db0e4d96b51c4ad65df35a03
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:c0f97ca7db0e4d96b51c4ad65df35a032021-11-11T07:29:33ZTrends in Cognitive Function Among Chinese Elderly From 1998 to 2018: An Age-Period-Cohort Analysis2296-256510.3389/fpubh.2021.753671https://doaj.org/article/c0f97ca7db0e4d96b51c4ad65df35a032021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2021.753671/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/2296-2565Objectives: To investigate the effects of age, period, and cohort (APC) on trends in cognitive function among the Chinese elderly, and to explore how gender gaps in cognitive function change with age, period, and cohort.Methods: This study used data from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS) from 1998 to 2018, and included 90,432 participants aged above 65 years old. The measurement of cognitive function was the score of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Cross-classified random-effect models were used to investigate age, period, and cohort trends in cognitive function.Results: Mini-Mental State Examination scores decreased with age at an increasing rate. While the cohort effect was nearly stable, the period effect demonstrated a downward trend from 1998 to 2002 followed by a nearly flat line. Females were associated with lower MMSE scores than males. When age increased, the gender gaps in MMSE scores further increased. The period-based gender gaps in MMSE scores diverged throughout the 20 years, while the cohort-based gender disparities in MMSE scores converged with successive cohorts.Conclusions: Age, period, and cohort had different and independent effects on cognitive function among the Chinese elderly. The effect of age was stronger than that of period and cohort. Gender disparities in cognitive function increased with age and period, and decreased with successive cohorts.Xiaoqian HuXiaoqian HuShuyan GuXuemei ZhenXuemei ZhenXueshan SunYuxuan GuHengjin DongHengjin DongFrontiers Media S.A.articleage-period-cohortcognitionChinaelderlygender disparityPublic aspects of medicineRA1-1270ENFrontiers in Public Health, Vol 9 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic age-period-cohort
cognition
China
elderly
gender disparity
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
spellingShingle age-period-cohort
cognition
China
elderly
gender disparity
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
Xiaoqian Hu
Xiaoqian Hu
Shuyan Gu
Xuemei Zhen
Xuemei Zhen
Xueshan Sun
Yuxuan Gu
Hengjin Dong
Hengjin Dong
Trends in Cognitive Function Among Chinese Elderly From 1998 to 2018: An Age-Period-Cohort Analysis
description Objectives: To investigate the effects of age, period, and cohort (APC) on trends in cognitive function among the Chinese elderly, and to explore how gender gaps in cognitive function change with age, period, and cohort.Methods: This study used data from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS) from 1998 to 2018, and included 90,432 participants aged above 65 years old. The measurement of cognitive function was the score of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Cross-classified random-effect models were used to investigate age, period, and cohort trends in cognitive function.Results: Mini-Mental State Examination scores decreased with age at an increasing rate. While the cohort effect was nearly stable, the period effect demonstrated a downward trend from 1998 to 2002 followed by a nearly flat line. Females were associated with lower MMSE scores than males. When age increased, the gender gaps in MMSE scores further increased. The period-based gender gaps in MMSE scores diverged throughout the 20 years, while the cohort-based gender disparities in MMSE scores converged with successive cohorts.Conclusions: Age, period, and cohort had different and independent effects on cognitive function among the Chinese elderly. The effect of age was stronger than that of period and cohort. Gender disparities in cognitive function increased with age and period, and decreased with successive cohorts.
format article
author Xiaoqian Hu
Xiaoqian Hu
Shuyan Gu
Xuemei Zhen
Xuemei Zhen
Xueshan Sun
Yuxuan Gu
Hengjin Dong
Hengjin Dong
author_facet Xiaoqian Hu
Xiaoqian Hu
Shuyan Gu
Xuemei Zhen
Xuemei Zhen
Xueshan Sun
Yuxuan Gu
Hengjin Dong
Hengjin Dong
author_sort Xiaoqian Hu
title Trends in Cognitive Function Among Chinese Elderly From 1998 to 2018: An Age-Period-Cohort Analysis
title_short Trends in Cognitive Function Among Chinese Elderly From 1998 to 2018: An Age-Period-Cohort Analysis
title_full Trends in Cognitive Function Among Chinese Elderly From 1998 to 2018: An Age-Period-Cohort Analysis
title_fullStr Trends in Cognitive Function Among Chinese Elderly From 1998 to 2018: An Age-Period-Cohort Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Trends in Cognitive Function Among Chinese Elderly From 1998 to 2018: An Age-Period-Cohort Analysis
title_sort trends in cognitive function among chinese elderly from 1998 to 2018: an age-period-cohort analysis
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/c0f97ca7db0e4d96b51c4ad65df35a03
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaoqianhu trendsincognitivefunctionamongchineseelderlyfrom1998to2018anageperiodcohortanalysis
AT xiaoqianhu trendsincognitivefunctionamongchineseelderlyfrom1998to2018anageperiodcohortanalysis
AT shuyangu trendsincognitivefunctionamongchineseelderlyfrom1998to2018anageperiodcohortanalysis
AT xuemeizhen trendsincognitivefunctionamongchineseelderlyfrom1998to2018anageperiodcohortanalysis
AT xuemeizhen trendsincognitivefunctionamongchineseelderlyfrom1998to2018anageperiodcohortanalysis
AT xueshansun trendsincognitivefunctionamongchineseelderlyfrom1998to2018anageperiodcohortanalysis
AT yuxuangu trendsincognitivefunctionamongchineseelderlyfrom1998to2018anageperiodcohortanalysis
AT hengjindong trendsincognitivefunctionamongchineseelderlyfrom1998to2018anageperiodcohortanalysis
AT hengjindong trendsincognitivefunctionamongchineseelderlyfrom1998to2018anageperiodcohortanalysis
_version_ 1718439436480413696