An approach to assess stress in response to drive hunts using cortisol levels of wild boar (Sus scrofa)
Abstract Hunting can easily be linked to stress in wildlife. Drive hunts performed two to three times in one area during the respective hunting period, are thought to decrease the pressure hunting places on wildlife. Nevertheless, the expression of cortisol—one of the main mammalian stress hormones—...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/c1315d98f4df466fa10aaf6a3d9fbcf0 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:c1315d98f4df466fa10aaf6a3d9fbcf0 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:c1315d98f4df466fa10aaf6a3d9fbcf02021-12-02T16:28:06ZAn approach to assess stress in response to drive hunts using cortisol levels of wild boar (Sus scrofa)10.1038/s41598-021-95927-22045-2322https://doaj.org/article/c1315d98f4df466fa10aaf6a3d9fbcf02021-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95927-2https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Hunting can easily be linked to stress in wildlife. Drive hunts performed two to three times in one area during the respective hunting period, are thought to decrease the pressure hunting places on wildlife. Nevertheless, the expression of cortisol—one of the main mammalian stress hormones—is considered to have negative impacts on animals’ well-being if expressed excessively, which may occur during some (especially repeated) hunting events. We explored the effect of drive hunts on cortisol levels in wild boar in Lower Saxony, Germany, compared these cortisol levels to reference values given by a similar study, and investigated the effect of age, sex, and pregnancy. Blood collected from wild boar shot on drive hunts was analysed using a radioimmunoassay. As expected, we observed elevated cortisol levels in all samples, however, we still found significant differences between age groups and sexes, as well as an influence of pregnancy on cortisol levels. The effect of drive hunts on cortisol levels appears to be weaker than predicted, while the effects of other variables, such as sex, are distinct. Only half of the evaluated samples showed explicitly increased cortisol levels and no significant differences were found between sampling months and locations. Group living animals and pregnant females showed significantly higher cortisol levels. The impact of hunting is measurable but is masked by natural effects such as pregnancy. Thus, we need more information on stress levels in game species.Justine GüldenpfennigMarion SchmickeMartina HoedemakerUrsula SiebertOliver KeulingNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Justine Güldenpfennig Marion Schmicke Martina Hoedemaker Ursula Siebert Oliver Keuling An approach to assess stress in response to drive hunts using cortisol levels of wild boar (Sus scrofa) |
description |
Abstract Hunting can easily be linked to stress in wildlife. Drive hunts performed two to three times in one area during the respective hunting period, are thought to decrease the pressure hunting places on wildlife. Nevertheless, the expression of cortisol—one of the main mammalian stress hormones—is considered to have negative impacts on animals’ well-being if expressed excessively, which may occur during some (especially repeated) hunting events. We explored the effect of drive hunts on cortisol levels in wild boar in Lower Saxony, Germany, compared these cortisol levels to reference values given by a similar study, and investigated the effect of age, sex, and pregnancy. Blood collected from wild boar shot on drive hunts was analysed using a radioimmunoassay. As expected, we observed elevated cortisol levels in all samples, however, we still found significant differences between age groups and sexes, as well as an influence of pregnancy on cortisol levels. The effect of drive hunts on cortisol levels appears to be weaker than predicted, while the effects of other variables, such as sex, are distinct. Only half of the evaluated samples showed explicitly increased cortisol levels and no significant differences were found between sampling months and locations. Group living animals and pregnant females showed significantly higher cortisol levels. The impact of hunting is measurable but is masked by natural effects such as pregnancy. Thus, we need more information on stress levels in game species. |
format |
article |
author |
Justine Güldenpfennig Marion Schmicke Martina Hoedemaker Ursula Siebert Oliver Keuling |
author_facet |
Justine Güldenpfennig Marion Schmicke Martina Hoedemaker Ursula Siebert Oliver Keuling |
author_sort |
Justine Güldenpfennig |
title |
An approach to assess stress in response to drive hunts using cortisol levels of wild boar (Sus scrofa) |
title_short |
An approach to assess stress in response to drive hunts using cortisol levels of wild boar (Sus scrofa) |
title_full |
An approach to assess stress in response to drive hunts using cortisol levels of wild boar (Sus scrofa) |
title_fullStr |
An approach to assess stress in response to drive hunts using cortisol levels of wild boar (Sus scrofa) |
title_full_unstemmed |
An approach to assess stress in response to drive hunts using cortisol levels of wild boar (Sus scrofa) |
title_sort |
approach to assess stress in response to drive hunts using cortisol levels of wild boar (sus scrofa) |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/c1315d98f4df466fa10aaf6a3d9fbcf0 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT justineguldenpfennig anapproachtoassessstressinresponsetodrivehuntsusingcortisollevelsofwildboarsusscrofa AT marionschmicke anapproachtoassessstressinresponsetodrivehuntsusingcortisollevelsofwildboarsusscrofa AT martinahoedemaker anapproachtoassessstressinresponsetodrivehuntsusingcortisollevelsofwildboarsusscrofa AT ursulasiebert anapproachtoassessstressinresponsetodrivehuntsusingcortisollevelsofwildboarsusscrofa AT oliverkeuling anapproachtoassessstressinresponsetodrivehuntsusingcortisollevelsofwildboarsusscrofa AT justineguldenpfennig approachtoassessstressinresponsetodrivehuntsusingcortisollevelsofwildboarsusscrofa AT marionschmicke approachtoassessstressinresponsetodrivehuntsusingcortisollevelsofwildboarsusscrofa AT martinahoedemaker approachtoassessstressinresponsetodrivehuntsusingcortisollevelsofwildboarsusscrofa AT ursulasiebert approachtoassessstressinresponsetodrivehuntsusingcortisollevelsofwildboarsusscrofa AT oliverkeuling approachtoassessstressinresponsetodrivehuntsusingcortisollevelsofwildboarsusscrofa |
_version_ |
1718383956757315584 |