An approach to assess stress in response to drive hunts using cortisol levels of wild boar (Sus scrofa)

Abstract Hunting can easily be linked to stress in wildlife. Drive hunts performed two to three times in one area during the respective hunting period, are thought to decrease the pressure hunting places on wildlife. Nevertheless, the expression of cortisol—one of the main mammalian stress hormones—...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Justine Güldenpfennig, Marion Schmicke, Martina Hoedemaker, Ursula Siebert, Oliver Keuling
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/c1315d98f4df466fa10aaf6a3d9fbcf0
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:c1315d98f4df466fa10aaf6a3d9fbcf0
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:c1315d98f4df466fa10aaf6a3d9fbcf02021-12-02T16:28:06ZAn approach to assess stress in response to drive hunts using cortisol levels of wild boar (Sus scrofa)10.1038/s41598-021-95927-22045-2322https://doaj.org/article/c1315d98f4df466fa10aaf6a3d9fbcf02021-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95927-2https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Hunting can easily be linked to stress in wildlife. Drive hunts performed two to three times in one area during the respective hunting period, are thought to decrease the pressure hunting places on wildlife. Nevertheless, the expression of cortisol—one of the main mammalian stress hormones—is considered to have negative impacts on animals’ well-being if expressed excessively, which may occur during some (especially repeated) hunting events. We explored the effect of drive hunts on cortisol levels in wild boar in Lower Saxony, Germany, compared these cortisol levels to reference values given by a similar study, and investigated the effect of age, sex, and pregnancy. Blood collected from wild boar shot on drive hunts was analysed using a radioimmunoassay. As expected, we observed elevated cortisol levels in all samples, however, we still found significant differences between age groups and sexes, as well as an influence of pregnancy on cortisol levels. The effect of drive hunts on cortisol levels appears to be weaker than predicted, while the effects of other variables, such as sex, are distinct. Only half of the evaluated samples showed explicitly increased cortisol levels and no significant differences were found between sampling months and locations. Group living animals and pregnant females showed significantly higher cortisol levels. The impact of hunting is measurable but is masked by natural effects such as pregnancy. Thus, we need more information on stress levels in game species.Justine GüldenpfennigMarion SchmickeMartina HoedemakerUrsula SiebertOliver KeulingNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Justine Güldenpfennig
Marion Schmicke
Martina Hoedemaker
Ursula Siebert
Oliver Keuling
An approach to assess stress in response to drive hunts using cortisol levels of wild boar (Sus scrofa)
description Abstract Hunting can easily be linked to stress in wildlife. Drive hunts performed two to three times in one area during the respective hunting period, are thought to decrease the pressure hunting places on wildlife. Nevertheless, the expression of cortisol—one of the main mammalian stress hormones—is considered to have negative impacts on animals’ well-being if expressed excessively, which may occur during some (especially repeated) hunting events. We explored the effect of drive hunts on cortisol levels in wild boar in Lower Saxony, Germany, compared these cortisol levels to reference values given by a similar study, and investigated the effect of age, sex, and pregnancy. Blood collected from wild boar shot on drive hunts was analysed using a radioimmunoassay. As expected, we observed elevated cortisol levels in all samples, however, we still found significant differences between age groups and sexes, as well as an influence of pregnancy on cortisol levels. The effect of drive hunts on cortisol levels appears to be weaker than predicted, while the effects of other variables, such as sex, are distinct. Only half of the evaluated samples showed explicitly increased cortisol levels and no significant differences were found between sampling months and locations. Group living animals and pregnant females showed significantly higher cortisol levels. The impact of hunting is measurable but is masked by natural effects such as pregnancy. Thus, we need more information on stress levels in game species.
format article
author Justine Güldenpfennig
Marion Schmicke
Martina Hoedemaker
Ursula Siebert
Oliver Keuling
author_facet Justine Güldenpfennig
Marion Schmicke
Martina Hoedemaker
Ursula Siebert
Oliver Keuling
author_sort Justine Güldenpfennig
title An approach to assess stress in response to drive hunts using cortisol levels of wild boar (Sus scrofa)
title_short An approach to assess stress in response to drive hunts using cortisol levels of wild boar (Sus scrofa)
title_full An approach to assess stress in response to drive hunts using cortisol levels of wild boar (Sus scrofa)
title_fullStr An approach to assess stress in response to drive hunts using cortisol levels of wild boar (Sus scrofa)
title_full_unstemmed An approach to assess stress in response to drive hunts using cortisol levels of wild boar (Sus scrofa)
title_sort approach to assess stress in response to drive hunts using cortisol levels of wild boar (sus scrofa)
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/c1315d98f4df466fa10aaf6a3d9fbcf0
work_keys_str_mv AT justineguldenpfennig anapproachtoassessstressinresponsetodrivehuntsusingcortisollevelsofwildboarsusscrofa
AT marionschmicke anapproachtoassessstressinresponsetodrivehuntsusingcortisollevelsofwildboarsusscrofa
AT martinahoedemaker anapproachtoassessstressinresponsetodrivehuntsusingcortisollevelsofwildboarsusscrofa
AT ursulasiebert anapproachtoassessstressinresponsetodrivehuntsusingcortisollevelsofwildboarsusscrofa
AT oliverkeuling anapproachtoassessstressinresponsetodrivehuntsusingcortisollevelsofwildboarsusscrofa
AT justineguldenpfennig approachtoassessstressinresponsetodrivehuntsusingcortisollevelsofwildboarsusscrofa
AT marionschmicke approachtoassessstressinresponsetodrivehuntsusingcortisollevelsofwildboarsusscrofa
AT martinahoedemaker approachtoassessstressinresponsetodrivehuntsusingcortisollevelsofwildboarsusscrofa
AT ursulasiebert approachtoassessstressinresponsetodrivehuntsusingcortisollevelsofwildboarsusscrofa
AT oliverkeuling approachtoassessstressinresponsetodrivehuntsusingcortisollevelsofwildboarsusscrofa
_version_ 1718383956757315584