Tradition and Innovation Dialectics in Russian Dissertation Culture

Today in Russia the system of the state scientific certification undergoes significant changes: the powers of federal executive authorities are delegated to the educational and scientific organizations. As a result, independence in the choice of mechanisms, orders and procedures of formation of diss...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	P. I. Kasatkin, E. A. Antyukhova
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN RU
Publicado:	MGIMO University Press 2019
Materias:	phd culture dissertation board granting phd scientific assessment phd candidate scientific opponent nominated internal examiner scientific publication International relations JZ2-6530
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/c13bd1c00db44a67959dfa4f77c72292
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:c13bd1c00db44a67959dfa4f77c72292
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:c13bd1c00db44a67959dfa4f77c722922021-11-23T14:50:41ZTradition and Innovation Dialectics in Russian Dissertation Culture2071-81602541-909910.24833/2071-8160-2019-2-65-176-195https://doaj.org/article/c13bd1c00db44a67959dfa4f77c722922019-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/929https://doaj.org/toc/2071-8160https://doaj.org/toc/2541-9099Today in Russia the system of the state scientific certification undergoes significant changes: the powers of federal executive authorities are delegated to the educational and scientific organizations. As a result, independence in the choice of mechanisms, orders and procedures of formation of dissertation committees and criteria of awarding academic degrees is allowed. At the same time reinterpretation of axiological bases of dissertation culture through overcoming the problems connected with authenticity and quality of dissertation researches, by increase in reputation responsibility of the organizations and scientists takes place. On May 31, 2019 it will be a year to the moment of transition of the MGIMO University to a new model of the state scientific certification. According to the model developed by the MGIMO University, awarding an academic degree comes by the results of the defense of a thesis at a meeting of the dissertation committee of 5 doctors of science, three of which are employees of the MGIMO University, and two are invited scientists from other organizations. Two of five are experts with publications in the scope of the research combining the role of a member of the dissertation committee and an official opponent. The result of the defense is politically variable: alongside with the possibility of taking the negative decision awarding an academic degree without completions of the text and also under the condition of insignificant and considerable completions of the text of a research is allowed. The lack of such opportunities in the practice of awarding academic degrees existing in the domestic dissertation culture excluding modification of the manuscript submitted to defence after holding a meeting of dissertation committees, as well as other defects of the historically developed model of awarding academic degrees, defined the fastest transition of the MGIMO University to a new model of certification. «MGIMO Review of International Relations» discussed the main milestones of formation and key problems of development of the domestic dissertation culture with P. Kasatkin and E. Antyukhova.P. I. KasatkinE. A. AntyukhovaMGIMO University Pressarticlephd culturedissertation boardgranting phdscientific assessmentphd candidatescientific opponentnominated internal examinerscientific publicationInternational relationsJZ2-6530ENRUVestnik MGIMO-Universiteta, Vol 0, Iss 2(65), Pp 176-195 (2019)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN RU
topic	phd culture dissertation board granting phd scientific assessment phd candidate scientific opponent nominated internal examiner scientific publication International relations JZ2-6530
spellingShingle	phd culture dissertation board granting phd scientific assessment phd candidate scientific opponent nominated internal examiner scientific publication International relations JZ2-6530 P. I. Kasatkin E. A. Antyukhova Tradition and Innovation Dialectics in Russian Dissertation Culture
description	Today in Russia the system of the state scientific certification undergoes significant changes: the powers of federal executive authorities are delegated to the educational and scientific organizations. As a result, independence in the choice of mechanisms, orders and procedures of formation of dissertation committees and criteria of awarding academic degrees is allowed. At the same time reinterpretation of axiological bases of dissertation culture through overcoming the problems connected with authenticity and quality of dissertation researches, by increase in reputation responsibility of the organizations and scientists takes place. On May 31, 2019 it will be a year to the moment of transition of the MGIMO University to a new model of the state scientific certification. According to the model developed by the MGIMO University, awarding an academic degree comes by the results of the defense of a thesis at a meeting of the dissertation committee of 5 doctors of science, three of which are employees of the MGIMO University, and two are invited scientists from other organizations. Two of five are experts with publications in the scope of the research combining the role of a member of the dissertation committee and an official opponent. The result of the defense is politically variable: alongside with the possibility of taking the negative decision awarding an academic degree without completions of the text and also under the condition of insignificant and considerable completions of the text of a research is allowed. The lack of such opportunities in the practice of awarding academic degrees existing in the domestic dissertation culture excluding modification of the manuscript submitted to defence after holding a meeting of dissertation committees, as well as other defects of the historically developed model of awarding academic degrees, defined the fastest transition of the MGIMO University to a new model of certification. «MGIMO Review of International Relations» discussed the main milestones of formation and key problems of development of the domestic dissertation culture with P. Kasatkin and E. Antyukhova.
format	article
author	P. I. Kasatkin E. A. Antyukhova
author_facet	P. I. Kasatkin E. A. Antyukhova
author_sort	P. I. Kasatkin
title	Tradition and Innovation Dialectics in Russian Dissertation Culture
title_short	Tradition and Innovation Dialectics in Russian Dissertation Culture
title_full	Tradition and Innovation Dialectics in Russian Dissertation Culture
title_fullStr	Tradition and Innovation Dialectics in Russian Dissertation Culture
title_full_unstemmed	Tradition and Innovation Dialectics in Russian Dissertation Culture
title_sort	tradition and innovation dialectics in russian dissertation culture
publisher	MGIMO University Press
publishDate	2019
url	https://doaj.org/article/c13bd1c00db44a67959dfa4f77c72292
work_keys_str_mv	AT pikasatkin traditionandinnovationdialecticsinrussiandissertationculture AT eaantyukhova traditionandinnovationdialecticsinrussiandissertationculture
_version_	1718416672729071616

Tradition and Innovation Dialectics in Russian Dissertation Culture

Ejemplares similares