Evaluation of four different methods for assessing bee diversity as ecological indicators of agro-ecosystems
Monitoring of wild bees is becoming more and more popular in nature conservation because of the high indicator value of this insect group. However, uncertainties about the sampling performance of different methods still exist, especially in areas of limited accessibility. We therefore compared four...
Enregistré dans:
Auteurs principaux: | André Krahner, Juliane Schmidt, Michael Maixner, Matthias Porten, Thomas Schmitt |
---|---|
Format: | article |
Langue: | EN |
Publié: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Sujets: | |
Accès en ligne: | https://doaj.org/article/c15be0f600714add8ebb5a10e8a6330a |
Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
Documents similaires
-
Insect biomass is not a consistent proxy for biodiversity metrics in wild bees
par: Nicolas J. Vereecken, et autres
Publié: (2021) -
The bee genus Pseudoanthidium: revision of the subgenus Exanthidium with the description of a new species (Apoidea: Megachilidae)
par: Max Kasparek
Publié: (2021) -
Failure under stress of grapevine wood: The effects of the cerambycid Xylotrechus arvicola on the biomechanics properties of Vitis vinifera
par: Rodríguez-González,Álvaro, et autres
Publié: (2020) -
Relative bee abundance varies by collection method and flowering richness: Implications for understanding patterns in bee community data
par: Marirose P. Kuhlman, et autres
Publié: (2021) -
Metabolic Effects of Bee Larva-Derived Protein in Mice: Assessment of an Alternative Protein Source
par: Yoko Yokoyama, et autres
Publié: (2021)