COVID-19 infection data encode a dynamic reproduction number in response to policy decisions with secondary wave implications

Abstract The SARS-CoV-2 virus is responsible for the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which has spread to populations throughout the continental United States. Most state and local governments have adopted some level of “social distancing” policy, but infections have continued to spread de...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Michael A. Rowland, Todd M. Swannack, Michael L. Mayo, Matthew Parno, Matthew Farthing, Ian Dettwiller, Glover George, William England, Molly Reif, Jeffrey Cegan, Benjamin Trump, Igor Linkov, Brandon Lafferty, Todd Bridges
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/c160da7cd6fb4d2d82d293e5d95a52b8
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:c160da7cd6fb4d2d82d293e5d95a52b8
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:c160da7cd6fb4d2d82d293e5d95a52b82021-12-02T14:47:38ZCOVID-19 infection data encode a dynamic reproduction number in response to policy decisions with secondary wave implications10.1038/s41598-021-90227-12045-2322https://doaj.org/article/c160da7cd6fb4d2d82d293e5d95a52b82021-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90227-1https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The SARS-CoV-2 virus is responsible for the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which has spread to populations throughout the continental United States. Most state and local governments have adopted some level of “social distancing” policy, but infections have continued to spread despite these efforts. Absent a vaccine, authorities have few other tools by which to mitigate further spread of the virus. This begs the question of how effective social policy really is at reducing new infections that, left alone, could potentially overwhelm the existing hospitalization capacity of many states. We developed a mathematical model that captures correlations between some state-level “social distancing” policies and infection kinetics for all U.S. states, and use it to illustrate the link between social policy decisions, disease dynamics, and an effective reproduction number that changes over time, for case studies of Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Washington states. In general, our findings indicate that the potential for second waves of infection, which result after reopening states without an increase to immunity, can be mitigated by a return of social distancing policies as soon as possible after the waves are detected.Michael A. RowlandTodd M. SwannackMichael L. MayoMatthew ParnoMatthew FarthingIan DettwillerGlover GeorgeWilliam EnglandMolly ReifJeffrey CeganBenjamin TrumpIgor LinkovBrandon LaffertyTodd BridgesNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Michael A. Rowland
Todd M. Swannack
Michael L. Mayo
Matthew Parno
Matthew Farthing
Ian Dettwiller
Glover George
William England
Molly Reif
Jeffrey Cegan
Benjamin Trump
Igor Linkov
Brandon Lafferty
Todd Bridges
COVID-19 infection data encode a dynamic reproduction number in response to policy decisions with secondary wave implications
description Abstract The SARS-CoV-2 virus is responsible for the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which has spread to populations throughout the continental United States. Most state and local governments have adopted some level of “social distancing” policy, but infections have continued to spread despite these efforts. Absent a vaccine, authorities have few other tools by which to mitigate further spread of the virus. This begs the question of how effective social policy really is at reducing new infections that, left alone, could potentially overwhelm the existing hospitalization capacity of many states. We developed a mathematical model that captures correlations between some state-level “social distancing” policies and infection kinetics for all U.S. states, and use it to illustrate the link between social policy decisions, disease dynamics, and an effective reproduction number that changes over time, for case studies of Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Washington states. In general, our findings indicate that the potential for second waves of infection, which result after reopening states without an increase to immunity, can be mitigated by a return of social distancing policies as soon as possible after the waves are detected.
format article
author Michael A. Rowland
Todd M. Swannack
Michael L. Mayo
Matthew Parno
Matthew Farthing
Ian Dettwiller
Glover George
William England
Molly Reif
Jeffrey Cegan
Benjamin Trump
Igor Linkov
Brandon Lafferty
Todd Bridges
author_facet Michael A. Rowland
Todd M. Swannack
Michael L. Mayo
Matthew Parno
Matthew Farthing
Ian Dettwiller
Glover George
William England
Molly Reif
Jeffrey Cegan
Benjamin Trump
Igor Linkov
Brandon Lafferty
Todd Bridges
author_sort Michael A. Rowland
title COVID-19 infection data encode a dynamic reproduction number in response to policy decisions with secondary wave implications
title_short COVID-19 infection data encode a dynamic reproduction number in response to policy decisions with secondary wave implications
title_full COVID-19 infection data encode a dynamic reproduction number in response to policy decisions with secondary wave implications
title_fullStr COVID-19 infection data encode a dynamic reproduction number in response to policy decisions with secondary wave implications
title_full_unstemmed COVID-19 infection data encode a dynamic reproduction number in response to policy decisions with secondary wave implications
title_sort covid-19 infection data encode a dynamic reproduction number in response to policy decisions with secondary wave implications
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/c160da7cd6fb4d2d82d293e5d95a52b8
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelarowland covid19infectiondataencodeadynamicreproductionnumberinresponsetopolicydecisionswithsecondarywaveimplications
AT toddmswannack covid19infectiondataencodeadynamicreproductionnumberinresponsetopolicydecisionswithsecondarywaveimplications
AT michaellmayo covid19infectiondataencodeadynamicreproductionnumberinresponsetopolicydecisionswithsecondarywaveimplications
AT matthewparno covid19infectiondataencodeadynamicreproductionnumberinresponsetopolicydecisionswithsecondarywaveimplications
AT matthewfarthing covid19infectiondataencodeadynamicreproductionnumberinresponsetopolicydecisionswithsecondarywaveimplications
AT iandettwiller covid19infectiondataencodeadynamicreproductionnumberinresponsetopolicydecisionswithsecondarywaveimplications
AT glovergeorge covid19infectiondataencodeadynamicreproductionnumberinresponsetopolicydecisionswithsecondarywaveimplications
AT williamengland covid19infectiondataencodeadynamicreproductionnumberinresponsetopolicydecisionswithsecondarywaveimplications
AT mollyreif covid19infectiondataencodeadynamicreproductionnumberinresponsetopolicydecisionswithsecondarywaveimplications
AT jeffreycegan covid19infectiondataencodeadynamicreproductionnumberinresponsetopolicydecisionswithsecondarywaveimplications
AT benjamintrump covid19infectiondataencodeadynamicreproductionnumberinresponsetopolicydecisionswithsecondarywaveimplications
AT igorlinkov covid19infectiondataencodeadynamicreproductionnumberinresponsetopolicydecisionswithsecondarywaveimplications
AT brandonlafferty covid19infectiondataencodeadynamicreproductionnumberinresponsetopolicydecisionswithsecondarywaveimplications
AT toddbridges covid19infectiondataencodeadynamicreproductionnumberinresponsetopolicydecisionswithsecondarywaveimplications
_version_ 1718389533474553856