Meanings of Culture and Books. From “Marriage of Convenience” to Signs of “First Love”
The article examines the polygraphic prerequisites for social reflection of the late Soviet and post-Soviet intellectuals and the connection between the autonomy of intellectual work and the autonomy of the publishing cycle. Based on a comparison of changes in publishing technologies and procedures...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | DE EN FR LT RU |
| Publicado: |
Vilnius University
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/c195dcb9de144701942ddbc0ed5afb96 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:doaj.org-article:c195dcb9de144701942ddbc0ed5afb96 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:c195dcb9de144701942ddbc0ed5afb962021-11-23T09:30:58ZMeanings of Culture and Books. From “Marriage of Convenience” to Signs of “First Love”10.15388/Litera.2021.63.2.130258-08021648-1143https://doaj.org/article/c195dcb9de144701942ddbc0ed5afb962021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.zurnalai.vu.lt/literatura/article/view/25076https://doaj.org/toc/0258-0802https://doaj.org/toc/1648-1143 The article examines the polygraphic prerequisites for social reflection of the late Soviet and post-Soviet intellectuals and the connection between the autonomy of intellectual work and the autonomy of the publishing cycle. Based on a comparison of changes in publishing technologies and procedures for preparing manuscripts for printing, the change of large paradigms in the perestroika era is reconstructed as derivatives of the cult of reading and the system of institutions that support it. It is argued that although intellectuals upheld the classical canon, the very ways of canonizing works of the past were deformed by changing publishing procedures. The crisis in publishing planning coincided with a new understanding of the intellectual's mission, which meant the establishment of new types of reading as dominant. Thus, the thought of autonomous culture and the simultaneous reconceptualization of world literature contributed to the understanding of publishing procedures as autonomously significant. The disintegration of the disciplinary order of the Soviet publishing sphere and independent scientific book publishing made it possible to complete the project of describing literature as a place of production of norms for the reception of culture that cast doubt on the previous state of literature, thereby approving the program of post-Soviet cultural studies. Alexander MarkovVilnius University articlepublishingperestroikacrisis of the Soviet economysocial reflectionRussian intelligentsiahistory of academic writingLiterature (General)PN1-6790Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languagesPG1-9665DEENFRLTRULiteratūra (Vilnius), Vol 63, Iss 2 (2021) |
| institution |
DOAJ |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
DE EN FR LT RU |
| topic |
publishing perestroika crisis of the Soviet economy social reflection Russian intelligentsia history of academic writing Literature (General) PN1-6790 Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665 |
| spellingShingle |
publishing perestroika crisis of the Soviet economy social reflection Russian intelligentsia history of academic writing Literature (General) PN1-6790 Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665 Alexander Markov Meanings of Culture and Books. From “Marriage of Convenience” to Signs of “First Love” |
| description |
The article examines the polygraphic prerequisites for social reflection of the late Soviet and post-Soviet intellectuals and the connection between the autonomy of intellectual work and the autonomy of the publishing cycle. Based on a comparison of changes in publishing technologies and procedures for preparing manuscripts for printing, the change of large paradigms in the perestroika era is reconstructed as derivatives of the cult of reading and the system of institutions that support it. It is argued that although intellectuals upheld the classical canon, the very ways of canonizing works of the past were deformed by changing publishing procedures. The crisis in publishing planning coincided with a new understanding of the intellectual's mission, which meant the establishment of new types of reading as dominant. Thus, the thought of autonomous culture and the simultaneous reconceptualization of world literature contributed to the understanding of publishing procedures as autonomously significant. The disintegration of the disciplinary order of the Soviet publishing sphere and independent scientific book publishing made it possible to complete the project of describing literature as a place of production of norms for the reception of culture that cast doubt on the previous state of literature, thereby approving the program of post-Soviet cultural studies.
|
| format |
article |
| author |
Alexander Markov |
| author_facet |
Alexander Markov |
| author_sort |
Alexander Markov |
| title |
Meanings of Culture and Books. From “Marriage of Convenience” to Signs of “First Love” |
| title_short |
Meanings of Culture and Books. From “Marriage of Convenience” to Signs of “First Love” |
| title_full |
Meanings of Culture and Books. From “Marriage of Convenience” to Signs of “First Love” |
| title_fullStr |
Meanings of Culture and Books. From “Marriage of Convenience” to Signs of “First Love” |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Meanings of Culture and Books. From “Marriage of Convenience” to Signs of “First Love” |
| title_sort |
meanings of culture and books. from “marriage of convenience” to signs of “first love” |
| publisher |
Vilnius University |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/c195dcb9de144701942ddbc0ed5afb96 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT alexandermarkov meaningsofcultureandbooksfrommarriageofconveniencetosignsoffirstlove |
| _version_ |
1718416848088727552 |