Handbook of field sampling for multi-taxon biodiversity studies in European forests
Forests host most terrestrial biodiversity and their sustainable management is crucial to halt biodiversity loss. Although scientific evidence indicates that sustainable forest management (SFM) should be assessed by monitoring multi-taxon biodiversity, most current SFM criteria and indicators accoun...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/c19eb98feefc47d7bfabb3b35e59bfda |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:doaj.org-article:c19eb98feefc47d7bfabb3b35e59bfda |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:c19eb98feefc47d7bfabb3b35e59bfda2021-12-01T05:01:38ZHandbook of field sampling for multi-taxon biodiversity studies in European forests1470-160X10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108266https://doaj.org/article/c19eb98feefc47d7bfabb3b35e59bfda2021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X21009316https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160XForests host most terrestrial biodiversity and their sustainable management is crucial to halt biodiversity loss. Although scientific evidence indicates that sustainable forest management (SFM) should be assessed by monitoring multi-taxon biodiversity, most current SFM criteria and indicators account only for trees or consider indirect biodiversity proxies. Several projects performed multi-taxon sampling to investigate the effects of forest management on biodiversity, but the large variability of their sampling approaches hampers the identification of general trends, and limits broad-scale inference for designing SFM. Here we address the need of common sampling protocols for forest structure and multi-taxon biodiversity to be used at broad spatial scales. We established a network of researchers involved in 41 projects on forest multi-taxon biodiversity across 13 European countries. The network data structure comprised the assessment of at least three taxa, and the measurement of forest stand structure in the same plots or stands. We mapped the sampling approaches to multi-taxon biodiversity, standing trees and deadwood, and used this overview to provide operational answers to two simple, yet crucial, questions: what to sample? How to sample? The most commonly sampled taxonomic groups are vascular plants (83% of datasets), beetles (80%), lichens (66%), birds (66%), fungi (61%), bryophytes (49%). They cover different forest structures and habitats, with a limited focus on soil, litter and forest canopy. Notwithstanding the common goal of assessing forest management effects on biodiversity, sampling approaches differed widely within and among taxonomic groups. Differences derive from sampling units (plots size, use of stand vs. plot scale), and from the focus on different substrates or functional groups of organisms. Sampling methods for standing trees and lying deadwood were relatively homogeneous and focused on volume calculations, but with a great variability in sampling units and diameter thresholds. We developed a handbook of sampling methods (SI 3) aimed at the greatest possible comparability across taxonomic groups and studies as a basis for European-wide biodiversity monitoring programs, robust understanding of biodiversity response to forest structure and management, and the identification of direct indicators of SFM.Sabina BurrascanoGiovanni TrentanoviYoan PailletJacob Heilmann-ClausenPaolo GiordaniSimonetta BagellaAndrés Bravo-OviedoThomas CampagnaroAlessandro CampanaroFrancesco ChianucciPallieter De SmedtItziar García-MijangosDinka MatoševićTommaso SitziaRéka AszalósGediminas BrazaitisAndrea CutiniEttore D'AndreaInken DoerflerJeňýk HofmeisterJan HošekPhilippe JanssenSebastian Kepfer RojasNathalie KorboulewskyDaniel KozákThibault LachatAsko LõhmusRosana LopezAnders MårellRadim MatulaMartin MikolášSilvana MunziBjörn NordénMeelis PärtelJohannes PennerKadri RunnelPeter SchallMiroslav SvobodaFlóra TinyaMariana UjházyováKris VandekerkhoveKris VerheyenFotios XystrakisPéter ÓdorElsevierarticleBiodiversityField methodsMulti-taxonIndicatorsSampling protocolForest stand structureEcologyQH540-549.5ENEcological Indicators, Vol 132, Iss , Pp 108266- (2021) |
| institution |
DOAJ |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
EN |
| topic |
Biodiversity Field methods Multi-taxon Indicators Sampling protocol Forest stand structure Ecology QH540-549.5 |
| spellingShingle |
Biodiversity Field methods Multi-taxon Indicators Sampling protocol Forest stand structure Ecology QH540-549.5 Sabina Burrascano Giovanni Trentanovi Yoan Paillet Jacob Heilmann-Clausen Paolo Giordani Simonetta Bagella Andrés Bravo-Oviedo Thomas Campagnaro Alessandro Campanaro Francesco Chianucci Pallieter De Smedt Itziar García-Mijangos Dinka Matošević Tommaso Sitzia Réka Aszalós Gediminas Brazaitis Andrea Cutini Ettore D'Andrea Inken Doerfler Jeňýk Hofmeister Jan Hošek Philippe Janssen Sebastian Kepfer Rojas Nathalie Korboulewsky Daniel Kozák Thibault Lachat Asko Lõhmus Rosana Lopez Anders Mårell Radim Matula Martin Mikoláš Silvana Munzi Björn Nordén Meelis Pärtel Johannes Penner Kadri Runnel Peter Schall Miroslav Svoboda Flóra Tinya Mariana Ujházyová Kris Vandekerkhove Kris Verheyen Fotios Xystrakis Péter Ódor Handbook of field sampling for multi-taxon biodiversity studies in European forests |
| description |
Forests host most terrestrial biodiversity and their sustainable management is crucial to halt biodiversity loss. Although scientific evidence indicates that sustainable forest management (SFM) should be assessed by monitoring multi-taxon biodiversity, most current SFM criteria and indicators account only for trees or consider indirect biodiversity proxies. Several projects performed multi-taxon sampling to investigate the effects of forest management on biodiversity, but the large variability of their sampling approaches hampers the identification of general trends, and limits broad-scale inference for designing SFM. Here we address the need of common sampling protocols for forest structure and multi-taxon biodiversity to be used at broad spatial scales. We established a network of researchers involved in 41 projects on forest multi-taxon biodiversity across 13 European countries. The network data structure comprised the assessment of at least three taxa, and the measurement of forest stand structure in the same plots or stands. We mapped the sampling approaches to multi-taxon biodiversity, standing trees and deadwood, and used this overview to provide operational answers to two simple, yet crucial, questions: what to sample? How to sample? The most commonly sampled taxonomic groups are vascular plants (83% of datasets), beetles (80%), lichens (66%), birds (66%), fungi (61%), bryophytes (49%). They cover different forest structures and habitats, with a limited focus on soil, litter and forest canopy. Notwithstanding the common goal of assessing forest management effects on biodiversity, sampling approaches differed widely within and among taxonomic groups. Differences derive from sampling units (plots size, use of stand vs. plot scale), and from the focus on different substrates or functional groups of organisms. Sampling methods for standing trees and lying deadwood were relatively homogeneous and focused on volume calculations, but with a great variability in sampling units and diameter thresholds. We developed a handbook of sampling methods (SI 3) aimed at the greatest possible comparability across taxonomic groups and studies as a basis for European-wide biodiversity monitoring programs, robust understanding of biodiversity response to forest structure and management, and the identification of direct indicators of SFM. |
| format |
article |
| author |
Sabina Burrascano Giovanni Trentanovi Yoan Paillet Jacob Heilmann-Clausen Paolo Giordani Simonetta Bagella Andrés Bravo-Oviedo Thomas Campagnaro Alessandro Campanaro Francesco Chianucci Pallieter De Smedt Itziar García-Mijangos Dinka Matošević Tommaso Sitzia Réka Aszalós Gediminas Brazaitis Andrea Cutini Ettore D'Andrea Inken Doerfler Jeňýk Hofmeister Jan Hošek Philippe Janssen Sebastian Kepfer Rojas Nathalie Korboulewsky Daniel Kozák Thibault Lachat Asko Lõhmus Rosana Lopez Anders Mårell Radim Matula Martin Mikoláš Silvana Munzi Björn Nordén Meelis Pärtel Johannes Penner Kadri Runnel Peter Schall Miroslav Svoboda Flóra Tinya Mariana Ujházyová Kris Vandekerkhove Kris Verheyen Fotios Xystrakis Péter Ódor |
| author_facet |
Sabina Burrascano Giovanni Trentanovi Yoan Paillet Jacob Heilmann-Clausen Paolo Giordani Simonetta Bagella Andrés Bravo-Oviedo Thomas Campagnaro Alessandro Campanaro Francesco Chianucci Pallieter De Smedt Itziar García-Mijangos Dinka Matošević Tommaso Sitzia Réka Aszalós Gediminas Brazaitis Andrea Cutini Ettore D'Andrea Inken Doerfler Jeňýk Hofmeister Jan Hošek Philippe Janssen Sebastian Kepfer Rojas Nathalie Korboulewsky Daniel Kozák Thibault Lachat Asko Lõhmus Rosana Lopez Anders Mårell Radim Matula Martin Mikoláš Silvana Munzi Björn Nordén Meelis Pärtel Johannes Penner Kadri Runnel Peter Schall Miroslav Svoboda Flóra Tinya Mariana Ujházyová Kris Vandekerkhove Kris Verheyen Fotios Xystrakis Péter Ódor |
| author_sort |
Sabina Burrascano |
| title |
Handbook of field sampling for multi-taxon biodiversity studies in European forests |
| title_short |
Handbook of field sampling for multi-taxon biodiversity studies in European forests |
| title_full |
Handbook of field sampling for multi-taxon biodiversity studies in European forests |
| title_fullStr |
Handbook of field sampling for multi-taxon biodiversity studies in European forests |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Handbook of field sampling for multi-taxon biodiversity studies in European forests |
| title_sort |
handbook of field sampling for multi-taxon biodiversity studies in european forests |
| publisher |
Elsevier |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/c19eb98feefc47d7bfabb3b35e59bfda |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT sabinaburrascano handbookoffieldsamplingformultitaxonbiodiversitystudiesineuropeanforests AT giovannitrentanovi handbookoffieldsamplingformultitaxonbiodiversitystudiesineuropeanforests AT yoanpaillet handbookoffieldsamplingformultitaxonbiodiversitystudiesineuropeanforests AT jacobheilmannclausen handbookoffieldsamplingformultitaxonbiodiversitystudiesineuropeanforests AT paologiordani handbookoffieldsamplingformultitaxonbiodiversitystudiesineuropeanforests AT simonettabagella handbookoffieldsamplingformultitaxonbiodiversitystudiesineuropeanforests AT andresbravooviedo handbookoffieldsamplingformultitaxonbiodiversitystudiesineuropeanforests AT thomascampagnaro handbookoffieldsamplingformultitaxonbiodiversitystudiesineuropeanforests AT alessandrocampanaro handbookoffieldsamplingformultitaxonbiodiversitystudiesineuropeanforests AT francescochianucci handbookoffieldsamplingformultitaxonbiodiversitystudiesineuropeanforests AT pallieterdesmedt handbookoffieldsamplingformultitaxonbiodiversitystudiesineuropeanforests AT itziargarciamijangos handbookoffieldsamplingformultitaxonbiodiversitystudiesineuropeanforests AT dinkamatosevic handbookoffieldsamplingformultitaxonbiodiversitystudiesineuropeanforests AT tommasositzia handbookoffieldsamplingformultitaxonbiodiversitystudiesineuropeanforests AT rekaaszalos handbookoffieldsamplingformultitaxonbiodiversitystudiesineuropeanforests AT gediminasbrazaitis handbookoffieldsamplingformultitaxonbiodiversitystudiesineuropeanforests AT andreacutini handbookoffieldsamplingformultitaxonbiodiversitystudiesineuropeanforests AT ettoredandrea handbookoffieldsamplingformultitaxonbiodiversitystudiesineuropeanforests AT inkendoerfler handbookoffieldsamplingformultitaxonbiodiversitystudiesineuropeanforests AT jenykhofmeister handbookoffieldsamplingformultitaxonbiodiversitystudiesineuropeanforests AT janhosek handbookoffieldsamplingformultitaxonbiodiversitystudiesineuropeanforests AT philippejanssen handbookoffieldsamplingformultitaxonbiodiversitystudiesineuropeanforests AT sebastiankepferrojas handbookoffieldsamplingformultitaxonbiodiversitystudiesineuropeanforests AT nathaliekorboulewsky handbookoffieldsamplingformultitaxonbiodiversitystudiesineuropeanforests AT danielkozak handbookoffieldsamplingformultitaxonbiodiversitystudiesineuropeanforests AT thibaultlachat handbookoffieldsamplingformultitaxonbiodiversitystudiesineuropeanforests AT askolohmus handbookoffieldsamplingformultitaxonbiodiversitystudiesineuropeanforests AT rosanalopez handbookoffieldsamplingformultitaxonbiodiversitystudiesineuropeanforests AT andersmarell handbookoffieldsamplingformultitaxonbiodiversitystudiesineuropeanforests AT radimmatula handbookoffieldsamplingformultitaxonbiodiversitystudiesineuropeanforests AT martinmikolas handbookoffieldsamplingformultitaxonbiodiversitystudiesineuropeanforests AT silvanamunzi handbookoffieldsamplingformultitaxonbiodiversitystudiesineuropeanforests AT bjornnorden handbookoffieldsamplingformultitaxonbiodiversitystudiesineuropeanforests AT meelispartel handbookoffieldsamplingformultitaxonbiodiversitystudiesineuropeanforests AT johannespenner handbookoffieldsamplingformultitaxonbiodiversitystudiesineuropeanforests AT kadrirunnel handbookoffieldsamplingformultitaxonbiodiversitystudiesineuropeanforests AT peterschall handbookoffieldsamplingformultitaxonbiodiversitystudiesineuropeanforests AT miroslavsvoboda handbookoffieldsamplingformultitaxonbiodiversitystudiesineuropeanforests AT floratinya handbookoffieldsamplingformultitaxonbiodiversitystudiesineuropeanforests AT marianaujhazyova handbookoffieldsamplingformultitaxonbiodiversitystudiesineuropeanforests AT krisvandekerkhove handbookoffieldsamplingformultitaxonbiodiversitystudiesineuropeanforests AT krisverheyen handbookoffieldsamplingformultitaxonbiodiversitystudiesineuropeanforests AT fotiosxystrakis handbookoffieldsamplingformultitaxonbiodiversitystudiesineuropeanforests AT peterodor handbookoffieldsamplingformultitaxonbiodiversitystudiesineuropeanforests |
| _version_ |
1718405625386369024 |