The Efficacy Comparison Between Guan-Fu Base A Hydrochloric Injection vs. Propafenone Hydrochloric Injection in the Treatment of Arrhythmia: Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective: To determine using a systematic assessment and meta-analysis if GFA injection is an appropriate substitute of propafenone for arrhythmic.Design: Conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Data Source: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, Wan...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Jinming Song, Yao Tang, Chao Gao, Xiaofeng Hou, Xinyue Liu, Zongpei Xu
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:	Guan-Fu base A propafenone arrhythmia ventricular premature beats (VPB) supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system RC666-701
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/c1a097a03c354409bc0aa6790089b660
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:c1a097a03c354409bc0aa6790089b660
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:c1a097a03c354409bc0aa6790089b6602021-11-05T10:05:27ZThe Efficacy Comparison Between Guan-Fu Base A Hydrochloric Injection vs. Propafenone Hydrochloric Injection in the Treatment of Arrhythmia: Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis2297-055X10.3389/fcvm.2021.723932https://doaj.org/article/c1a097a03c354409bc0aa6790089b6602021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2021.723932/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/2297-055XObjective: To determine using a systematic assessment and meta-analysis if GFA injection is an appropriate substitute of propafenone for arrhythmic.Design: Conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Data Source: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, Wan-Fang Database, VIP, CNKI, and Sino Med from their inception to 7 March 2021.Eligibility Criteria for Selecting Studies: Inclusion of randomized controlled trials, which draws a comparison between GFA and propafenone. Evaluation of study integrity and conducted an extraction of independent data.Main Outcome Measure: Efficacy for supraventricular tachycardia, it is considered effective if it is reversed within 40 min (without considering recurrence); for premature ventricular beats, if they are reduced by more than 50% within 6 h.Results: Included in this current study are 1,294 research subjects pooled from 14 clinical studies. From the pooled assessment, GFA is demonstrated to be the equivalent of propafenone regarding the potency of effectiveness for tachycardia (RR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.96, 1.28, P = 0.15). The subset analysis indicated that GFA has a better effect on premature ventricular beats (RR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.70, P = 0.01) and a similar effect on supraventricular tachycardia (RR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.98, 1.12, P = 0.21). GFA effectiveness is lesser than propafenone in the case of mean converting time (WMD = −1.18, 95% CI: −2.30, −0.07, P = 0.04), systolic blood pressure (WMD = −3.53, 95% CI: −6.97, −0.09, P = 0.04), and QRS complex (WMD = −3.82, 95% CI: −6.96, −0.69, P = 0.02). Both GFA and propafenone have identical effects for diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, P-R interval, and QTc interval.Conclusion: A meta-analysis of RCTs was performed across 14 clinical trials, whereby 1,294 patients are used as research subjects. From the results, it is revealed that the effect exhibited by GFA injection is similar to the propafenone injection when treating premature ventricular beats or supraventricular tachycardia. Nevertheless, in certain academic disciplines, it was found that GFA is safer and beneficial compared to propafenone. Based on facts from relevant studies, GFA is deemed applicable during clinical practice.Systematic Review Registration:https://www.inplasy.com/inplasy-2021-3-0077/, identifier: INPLASY202130077.Jinming SongYao TangChao GaoXiaofeng HouXinyue LiuZongpei XuFrontiers Media S.A.articleGuan-Fu base Apropafenonearrhythmiaventricular premature beats (VPB)supraventricular tachycardia (SVT)Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) systemRC666-701ENFrontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, Vol 8 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Guan-Fu base A propafenone arrhythmia ventricular premature beats (VPB) supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system RC666-701
spellingShingle	Guan-Fu base A propafenone arrhythmia ventricular premature beats (VPB) supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system RC666-701 Jinming Song Yao Tang Chao Gao Xiaofeng Hou Xinyue Liu Zongpei Xu The Efficacy Comparison Between Guan-Fu Base A Hydrochloric Injection vs. Propafenone Hydrochloric Injection in the Treatment of Arrhythmia: Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis
description	Objective: To determine using a systematic assessment and meta-analysis if GFA injection is an appropriate substitute of propafenone for arrhythmic.Design: Conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Data Source: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, Wan-Fang Database, VIP, CNKI, and Sino Med from their inception to 7 March 2021.Eligibility Criteria for Selecting Studies: Inclusion of randomized controlled trials, which draws a comparison between GFA and propafenone. Evaluation of study integrity and conducted an extraction of independent data.Main Outcome Measure: Efficacy for supraventricular tachycardia, it is considered effective if it is reversed within 40 min (without considering recurrence); for premature ventricular beats, if they are reduced by more than 50% within 6 h.Results: Included in this current study are 1,294 research subjects pooled from 14 clinical studies. From the pooled assessment, GFA is demonstrated to be the equivalent of propafenone regarding the potency of effectiveness for tachycardia (RR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.96, 1.28, P = 0.15). The subset analysis indicated that GFA has a better effect on premature ventricular beats (RR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.70, P = 0.01) and a similar effect on supraventricular tachycardia (RR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.98, 1.12, P = 0.21). GFA effectiveness is lesser than propafenone in the case of mean converting time (WMD = −1.18, 95% CI: −2.30, −0.07, P = 0.04), systolic blood pressure (WMD = −3.53, 95% CI: −6.97, −0.09, P = 0.04), and QRS complex (WMD = −3.82, 95% CI: −6.96, −0.69, P = 0.02). Both GFA and propafenone have identical effects for diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, P-R interval, and QTc interval.Conclusion: A meta-analysis of RCTs was performed across 14 clinical trials, whereby 1,294 patients are used as research subjects. From the results, it is revealed that the effect exhibited by GFA injection is similar to the propafenone injection when treating premature ventricular beats or supraventricular tachycardia. Nevertheless, in certain academic disciplines, it was found that GFA is safer and beneficial compared to propafenone. Based on facts from relevant studies, GFA is deemed applicable during clinical practice.Systematic Review Registration:https://www.inplasy.com/inplasy-2021-3-0077/, identifier: INPLASY202130077.
format	article
author	Jinming Song Yao Tang Chao Gao Xiaofeng Hou Xinyue Liu Zongpei Xu
author_facet	Jinming Song Yao Tang Chao Gao Xiaofeng Hou Xinyue Liu Zongpei Xu
author_sort	Jinming Song
title	The Efficacy Comparison Between Guan-Fu Base A Hydrochloric Injection vs. Propafenone Hydrochloric Injection in the Treatment of Arrhythmia: Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short	The Efficacy Comparison Between Guan-Fu Base A Hydrochloric Injection vs. Propafenone Hydrochloric Injection in the Treatment of Arrhythmia: Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full	The Efficacy Comparison Between Guan-Fu Base A Hydrochloric Injection vs. Propafenone Hydrochloric Injection in the Treatment of Arrhythmia: Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr	The Efficacy Comparison Between Guan-Fu Base A Hydrochloric Injection vs. Propafenone Hydrochloric Injection in the Treatment of Arrhythmia: Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed	The Efficacy Comparison Between Guan-Fu Base A Hydrochloric Injection vs. Propafenone Hydrochloric Injection in the Treatment of Arrhythmia: Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort	efficacy comparison between guan-fu base a hydrochloric injection vs. propafenone hydrochloric injection in the treatment of arrhythmia: systemic review and meta-analysis
publisher	Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/c1a097a03c354409bc0aa6790089b660
work_keys_str_mv	AT jinmingsong theefficacycomparisonbetweenguanfubaseahydrochloricinjectionvspropafenonehydrochloricinjectioninthetreatmentofarrhythmiasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yaotang theefficacycomparisonbetweenguanfubaseahydrochloricinjectionvspropafenonehydrochloricinjectioninthetreatmentofarrhythmiasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chaogao theefficacycomparisonbetweenguanfubaseahydrochloricinjectionvspropafenonehydrochloricinjectioninthetreatmentofarrhythmiasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xiaofenghou theefficacycomparisonbetweenguanfubaseahydrochloricinjectionvspropafenonehydrochloricinjectioninthetreatmentofarrhythmiasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xinyueliu theefficacycomparisonbetweenguanfubaseahydrochloricinjectionvspropafenonehydrochloricinjectioninthetreatmentofarrhythmiasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zongpeixu theefficacycomparisonbetweenguanfubaseahydrochloricinjectionvspropafenonehydrochloricinjectioninthetreatmentofarrhythmiasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jinmingsong efficacycomparisonbetweenguanfubaseahydrochloricinjectionvspropafenonehydrochloricinjectioninthetreatmentofarrhythmiasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yaotang efficacycomparisonbetweenguanfubaseahydrochloricinjectionvspropafenonehydrochloricinjectioninthetreatmentofarrhythmiasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chaogao efficacycomparisonbetweenguanfubaseahydrochloricinjectionvspropafenonehydrochloricinjectioninthetreatmentofarrhythmiasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xiaofenghou efficacycomparisonbetweenguanfubaseahydrochloricinjectionvspropafenonehydrochloricinjectioninthetreatmentofarrhythmiasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xinyueliu efficacycomparisonbetweenguanfubaseahydrochloricinjectionvspropafenonehydrochloricinjectioninthetreatmentofarrhythmiasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zongpeixu efficacycomparisonbetweenguanfubaseahydrochloricinjectionvspropafenonehydrochloricinjectioninthetreatmentofarrhythmiasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_	1718444313660096512

The Efficacy Comparison Between Guan-Fu Base A Hydrochloric Injection vs. Propafenone Hydrochloric Injection in the Treatment of Arrhythmia: Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis

Ejemplares similares