Kategoria jednokrotności w polskich czasownikach

The Category of Semelfactivity in Polish Verbs Iterativity occurs in opposition to semelfactivity; when no contrast is present, these terms lose their meaning. Iterativity may be difficult to perceive in verbs such as robić ‘to do’, smucić się ‘to be sad’, malować ‘to paint’, which can be used b...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Krystyna Kleszczowa
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	DE EN FR PL RU
Publicado:	Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing 2020
Materias:	iteratywność jednokrotność aspekt wartość inchoatywna wartość finitywna gniazda słowotwórcze Language. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammar P101-410
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/c1e7989e1b9145d8826a87131e5ba1c5
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:c1e7989e1b9145d8826a87131e5ba1c5
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:c1e7989e1b9145d8826a87131e5ba1c52021-11-27T12:59:02ZKategoria jednokrotności w polskich czasownikach10.12797/LV.15.2020.30.071896-21222392-1226https://doaj.org/article/c1e7989e1b9145d8826a87131e5ba1c52020-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.akademicka.pl/lv/article/view/1439https://doaj.org/toc/1896-2122https://doaj.org/toc/2392-1226 The Category of Semelfactivity in Polish Verbs Iterativity occurs in opposition to semelfactivity; when no contrast is present, these terms lose their meaning. Iterativity may be difficult to perceive in verbs such as robić ‘to do’, smucić się ‘to be sad’, malować ‘to paint’, which can be used both in an iterative and a semelfactive capacity. It is therefore worthwhile to consider the problem of the opposition between iterativity and semelfactivity; it is worthwhile to investigate the morphological form of verbs which refer to actions that only happen once; it is worthwhile to examine the role of the aspect in those verbs, and to analyse their semantic marking (apart from semelfactivity). The issue is important for the Polish language, and yet it is commonly said that iterativity is in Polish in a state of decline. It is, however, only one certain type of the iterative : semelfactive pairs that is in decline; the emergence of the aspect changed the morphological nature of these pairs. The final part of the article (Section 6) poses the problem of word formation properties of verbs that refer to one-time acts. In those verbs in which the prefix only has an inchoative or final value in reference to the base (pomyśleć ‘to think’, zrobić ‘to do’), a blocking of the formation of iterativa can be observed. It might be even said that if such a verb is formed, it is an indication that the prefix introduced not only the value of perfectiveness, but perhaps another meaning as well. The peculiarity of semelfactivity has further consequences for the derivational system. It turns out that verbs which refer to actions that happen only once are incapable of creating substantive derivatives apart from names of actions, e.g. kopnięcie ‘a kick’, przewrócenie się ‘falling over’, zmartwienie się ‘becoming worried’. The problem is illustrated on the basis of examples furnished by dictionaries of word formation nests edited and developed by Mirosław Skarżyński. Krystyna KleszczowaKsiegarnia Akademicka Publishingarticleiteratywnośćjednokrotnośćaspektwartość inchoatywnawartość finitywnagniazda słowotwórczeLanguage. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammarP101-410DEENFRPLRULingVaria, Vol 15, Iss 2(30) (2020)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	DE EN FR PL RU
topic	iteratywność jednokrotność aspekt wartość inchoatywna wartość finitywna gniazda słowotwórcze Language. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammar P101-410
spellingShingle	iteratywność jednokrotność aspekt wartość inchoatywna wartość finitywna gniazda słowotwórcze Language. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammar P101-410 Krystyna Kleszczowa Kategoria jednokrotności w polskich czasownikach
description	The Category of Semelfactivity in Polish Verbs Iterativity occurs in opposition to semelfactivity; when no contrast is present, these terms lose their meaning. Iterativity may be difficult to perceive in verbs such as robić ‘to do’, smucić się ‘to be sad’, malować ‘to paint’, which can be used both in an iterative and a semelfactive capacity. It is therefore worthwhile to consider the problem of the opposition between iterativity and semelfactivity; it is worthwhile to investigate the morphological form of verbs which refer to actions that only happen once; it is worthwhile to examine the role of the aspect in those verbs, and to analyse their semantic marking (apart from semelfactivity). The issue is important for the Polish language, and yet it is commonly said that iterativity is in Polish in a state of decline. It is, however, only one certain type of the iterative : semelfactive pairs that is in decline; the emergence of the aspect changed the morphological nature of these pairs. The final part of the article (Section 6) poses the problem of word formation properties of verbs that refer to one-time acts. In those verbs in which the prefix only has an inchoative or final value in reference to the base (pomyśleć ‘to think’, zrobić ‘to do’), a blocking of the formation of iterativa can be observed. It might be even said that if such a verb is formed, it is an indication that the prefix introduced not only the value of perfectiveness, but perhaps another meaning as well. The peculiarity of semelfactivity has further consequences for the derivational system. It turns out that verbs which refer to actions that happen only once are incapable of creating substantive derivatives apart from names of actions, e.g. kopnięcie ‘a kick’, przewrócenie się ‘falling over’, zmartwienie się ‘becoming worried’. The problem is illustrated on the basis of examples furnished by dictionaries of word formation nests edited and developed by Mirosław Skarżyński.
format	article
author	Krystyna Kleszczowa
author_facet	Krystyna Kleszczowa
author_sort	Krystyna Kleszczowa
title	Kategoria jednokrotności w polskich czasownikach
title_short	Kategoria jednokrotności w polskich czasownikach
title_full	Kategoria jednokrotności w polskich czasownikach
title_fullStr	Kategoria jednokrotności w polskich czasownikach
title_full_unstemmed	Kategoria jednokrotności w polskich czasownikach
title_sort	kategoria jednokrotności w polskich czasownikach
publisher	Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing
publishDate	2020
url	https://doaj.org/article/c1e7989e1b9145d8826a87131e5ba1c5
work_keys_str_mv	AT krystynakleszczowa kategoriajednokrotnosciwpolskichczasownikach
_version_	1718408890787299328

Kategoria jednokrotności w polskich czasownikach

Ejemplares similares