Domination of Women? Gender Representation in the Corpus of Late Neolithic Anthropomorphic Figurines

Since the inception of the discipline of archaeology, figurines have been considered as the basis for research into the praehistoric social order and religious ideas. In spite of the numerous critiques, the idea that they are the reflection of adoration of Mother Goddess and fertility cults, has per...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Jasna Vuković
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
FR
SR
Publicado: University of Belgrade 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/c208fb8013e446489953033b626ac9c2
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:c208fb8013e446489953033b626ac9c2
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:c208fb8013e446489953033b626ac9c22021-11-17T19:15:45ZDomination of Women? Gender Representation in the Corpus of Late Neolithic Anthropomorphic Figurines10.21301/eap.v16i3.60353-15892334-8801https://doaj.org/article/c208fb8013e446489953033b626ac9c22021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.eap-iea.org/index.php/eap/article/view/200https://doaj.org/toc/0353-1589https://doaj.org/toc/2334-8801Since the inception of the discipline of archaeology, figurines have been considered as the basis for research into the praehistoric social order and religious ideas. In spite of the numerous critiques, the idea that they are the reflection of adoration of Mother Goddess and fertility cults, has persevered even to the present day, mainly thanks to the work of Maria Gimbutas. Her simplified approach to praehistory, apart from giving rise to pseudo-archaeological narratives, has induced severe criticism and polemics inside archaeology. The concept of the Goddess has migrated during the recent period from the academic writing to the realm of pseudo-science, daily politics and activism. In our country, the ideas of the Golden Past, considered to be the origin of the European civilization, are particularly present in the „grey zone“: the public sphere, facilitated through media. All these narratives are based upon the preconception that in the Neolithic collections the representations of women dominate. The results of the preliminary analyses of gender representation in Neolithic assemblages have proven that the claims of women’s dominance are ill-founded, and emphasized once more the significant presence, or even dominance of asexual figurines. On the other hand, the criteria for identification have shown to be unreliable, raising the question of usefulness of such attempts, as well as a number of new questions. Primarily, the role and meaning of the presence/absence of secondary sex attributes, their correlation to age, as well as possible regional differences in meaning and function of figurines are discussed. Jasna VukovićUniversity of Belgradearticleanthropomorphic figurinesLate Neolithicrepresentation of gender/sexMother Goddessfertility cultAnthropologyGN1-890ENFRSREtnoantropološki Problemi, Vol 16, Iss 3 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
FR
SR
topic anthropomorphic figurines
Late Neolithic
representation of gender/sex
Mother Goddess
fertility cult
Anthropology
GN1-890
spellingShingle anthropomorphic figurines
Late Neolithic
representation of gender/sex
Mother Goddess
fertility cult
Anthropology
GN1-890
Jasna Vuković
Domination of Women? Gender Representation in the Corpus of Late Neolithic Anthropomorphic Figurines
description Since the inception of the discipline of archaeology, figurines have been considered as the basis for research into the praehistoric social order and religious ideas. In spite of the numerous critiques, the idea that they are the reflection of adoration of Mother Goddess and fertility cults, has persevered even to the present day, mainly thanks to the work of Maria Gimbutas. Her simplified approach to praehistory, apart from giving rise to pseudo-archaeological narratives, has induced severe criticism and polemics inside archaeology. The concept of the Goddess has migrated during the recent period from the academic writing to the realm of pseudo-science, daily politics and activism. In our country, the ideas of the Golden Past, considered to be the origin of the European civilization, are particularly present in the „grey zone“: the public sphere, facilitated through media. All these narratives are based upon the preconception that in the Neolithic collections the representations of women dominate. The results of the preliminary analyses of gender representation in Neolithic assemblages have proven that the claims of women’s dominance are ill-founded, and emphasized once more the significant presence, or even dominance of asexual figurines. On the other hand, the criteria for identification have shown to be unreliable, raising the question of usefulness of such attempts, as well as a number of new questions. Primarily, the role and meaning of the presence/absence of secondary sex attributes, their correlation to age, as well as possible regional differences in meaning and function of figurines are discussed.
format article
author Jasna Vuković
author_facet Jasna Vuković
author_sort Jasna Vuković
title Domination of Women? Gender Representation in the Corpus of Late Neolithic Anthropomorphic Figurines
title_short Domination of Women? Gender Representation in the Corpus of Late Neolithic Anthropomorphic Figurines
title_full Domination of Women? Gender Representation in the Corpus of Late Neolithic Anthropomorphic Figurines
title_fullStr Domination of Women? Gender Representation in the Corpus of Late Neolithic Anthropomorphic Figurines
title_full_unstemmed Domination of Women? Gender Representation in the Corpus of Late Neolithic Anthropomorphic Figurines
title_sort domination of women? gender representation in the corpus of late neolithic anthropomorphic figurines
publisher University of Belgrade
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/c208fb8013e446489953033b626ac9c2
work_keys_str_mv AT jasnavukovic dominationofwomengenderrepresentationinthecorpusoflateneolithicanthropomorphicfigurines
_version_ 1718425380823498752