Home-based (virtual) rehabilitation improves motor and cognitive function for stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial of the Elements (EDNA-22) system

Abstract Background Home-based rehabilitation of arm function is a significant gap in service provision for adult stroke. The EDNA-22 tablet is a portable virtual rehabilitation-based system that provides a viable option for home-based rehabilitation using a suite of tailored movement tasks, and per...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peter H. Wilson, Jeffrey M. Rogers, Karin Vogel, Bert Steenbergen, Thomas B. McGuckian, Jonathan Duckworth
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: BMC 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/c216fa9caf434dc6b9d74051e32d286e
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:c216fa9caf434dc6b9d74051e32d286e
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:c216fa9caf434dc6b9d74051e32d286e2021-11-28T12:38:39ZHome-based (virtual) rehabilitation improves motor and cognitive function for stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial of the Elements (EDNA-22) system10.1186/s12984-021-00956-71743-0003https://doaj.org/article/c216fa9caf434dc6b9d74051e32d286e2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00956-7https://doaj.org/toc/1743-0003Abstract Background Home-based rehabilitation of arm function is a significant gap in service provision for adult stroke. The EDNA-22 tablet is a portable virtual rehabilitation-based system that provides a viable option for home-based rehabilitation using a suite of tailored movement tasks, and performance monitoring via cloud computing data storage. The study reported here aimed to compare use of the EDNA system with an active control (Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program—GRASP training) group using a parallel RCT design. Methods Of 19 originally randomized, 17 acute-care patients with upper-extremity dysfunction following unilateral stroke completed training in either the treatment (n = 10) or active control groups (n = 7), each receiving 8-weeks of in-home training involving 30-min sessions scheduled 3–4 times weekly. Performance was assessed across motor, cognitive and functional behaviour in the home. Primary motor measures, collected by a blinded assessor, were the Box and Blocks Task (BBT) and 9-Hole Pegboard Test (9HPT), and for cognition the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Functional behaviour was assessed using the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) and Neurobehavioural Functioning Inventory (NFI). Results One participant from each group withdrew for personal reasons. No adverse events were reported. Results showed a significant and large improvement in performance on the BBT for the more-affected hand in the EDNA training group, only (g = 0.90). There was a mild-to-moderate effect of training on the 9HPT for EDNA (g = 0.55) and control (g = 0.42) groups, again for the more affected hand. In relation to cognition, performance on the MoCA improved for the EDNA group (g = 0.70). Finally, the EDNA group showed moderate (but non-significant) improvement in functional behaviour on the SIS (g = 0.57) and NFI (g = 0.49). Conclusion A short course of home-based training using the EDNA-22 system can yield significant gains in motor and cognitive performance, over and above an active control training that also targets upper-limb function. Intriguingly, these changes in performance were corroborated only tentatively in the reports of caregivers. We suggest that future research consider how the implementation of home-based rehabilitation technology can be optimized. We contend that self-administered digitally-enhanced training needs to become part of the health literacy of all stakeholders who are impacted by stroke and other acquired brain injuries. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) Number: ACTRN12619001557123. Registered 12 November 2019, http://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=378298&isReview=truePeter H. WilsonJeffrey M. RogersKarin VogelBert SteenbergenThomas B. McGuckianJonathan DuckworthBMCarticleCognitionMotor activityRehabilitationStrokeUpper extremityVirtual rehabilitationNeurosciences. Biological psychiatry. NeuropsychiatryRC321-571ENJournal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, Vol 18, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Cognition
Motor activity
Rehabilitation
Stroke
Upper extremity
Virtual rehabilitation
Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
RC321-571
spellingShingle Cognition
Motor activity
Rehabilitation
Stroke
Upper extremity
Virtual rehabilitation
Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
RC321-571
Peter H. Wilson
Jeffrey M. Rogers
Karin Vogel
Bert Steenbergen
Thomas B. McGuckian
Jonathan Duckworth
Home-based (virtual) rehabilitation improves motor and cognitive function for stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial of the Elements (EDNA-22) system
description Abstract Background Home-based rehabilitation of arm function is a significant gap in service provision for adult stroke. The EDNA-22 tablet is a portable virtual rehabilitation-based system that provides a viable option for home-based rehabilitation using a suite of tailored movement tasks, and performance monitoring via cloud computing data storage. The study reported here aimed to compare use of the EDNA system with an active control (Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program—GRASP training) group using a parallel RCT design. Methods Of 19 originally randomized, 17 acute-care patients with upper-extremity dysfunction following unilateral stroke completed training in either the treatment (n = 10) or active control groups (n = 7), each receiving 8-weeks of in-home training involving 30-min sessions scheduled 3–4 times weekly. Performance was assessed across motor, cognitive and functional behaviour in the home. Primary motor measures, collected by a blinded assessor, were the Box and Blocks Task (BBT) and 9-Hole Pegboard Test (9HPT), and for cognition the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Functional behaviour was assessed using the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) and Neurobehavioural Functioning Inventory (NFI). Results One participant from each group withdrew for personal reasons. No adverse events were reported. Results showed a significant and large improvement in performance on the BBT for the more-affected hand in the EDNA training group, only (g = 0.90). There was a mild-to-moderate effect of training on the 9HPT for EDNA (g = 0.55) and control (g = 0.42) groups, again for the more affected hand. In relation to cognition, performance on the MoCA improved for the EDNA group (g = 0.70). Finally, the EDNA group showed moderate (but non-significant) improvement in functional behaviour on the SIS (g = 0.57) and NFI (g = 0.49). Conclusion A short course of home-based training using the EDNA-22 system can yield significant gains in motor and cognitive performance, over and above an active control training that also targets upper-limb function. Intriguingly, these changes in performance were corroborated only tentatively in the reports of caregivers. We suggest that future research consider how the implementation of home-based rehabilitation technology can be optimized. We contend that self-administered digitally-enhanced training needs to become part of the health literacy of all stakeholders who are impacted by stroke and other acquired brain injuries. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) Number: ACTRN12619001557123. Registered 12 November 2019, http://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=378298&isReview=true
format article
author Peter H. Wilson
Jeffrey M. Rogers
Karin Vogel
Bert Steenbergen
Thomas B. McGuckian
Jonathan Duckworth
author_facet Peter H. Wilson
Jeffrey M. Rogers
Karin Vogel
Bert Steenbergen
Thomas B. McGuckian
Jonathan Duckworth
author_sort Peter H. Wilson
title Home-based (virtual) rehabilitation improves motor and cognitive function for stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial of the Elements (EDNA-22) system
title_short Home-based (virtual) rehabilitation improves motor and cognitive function for stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial of the Elements (EDNA-22) system
title_full Home-based (virtual) rehabilitation improves motor and cognitive function for stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial of the Elements (EDNA-22) system
title_fullStr Home-based (virtual) rehabilitation improves motor and cognitive function for stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial of the Elements (EDNA-22) system
title_full_unstemmed Home-based (virtual) rehabilitation improves motor and cognitive function for stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial of the Elements (EDNA-22) system
title_sort home-based (virtual) rehabilitation improves motor and cognitive function for stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial of the elements (edna-22) system
publisher BMC
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/c216fa9caf434dc6b9d74051e32d286e
work_keys_str_mv AT peterhwilson homebasedvirtualrehabilitationimprovesmotorandcognitivefunctionforstrokepatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheelementsedna22system
AT jeffreymrogers homebasedvirtualrehabilitationimprovesmotorandcognitivefunctionforstrokepatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheelementsedna22system
AT karinvogel homebasedvirtualrehabilitationimprovesmotorandcognitivefunctionforstrokepatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheelementsedna22system
AT bertsteenbergen homebasedvirtualrehabilitationimprovesmotorandcognitivefunctionforstrokepatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheelementsedna22system
AT thomasbmcguckian homebasedvirtualrehabilitationimprovesmotorandcognitivefunctionforstrokepatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheelementsedna22system
AT jonathanduckworth homebasedvirtualrehabilitationimprovesmotorandcognitivefunctionforstrokepatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheelementsedna22system
_version_ 1718407856218177536