Recurrent intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct due to intraductal dissemination: a case report and literature review

Abstract Background Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct (IPNB) is a subtype of biliary tumor. The 5-year survival rate of patients with IPNB who underwent curative resection is 81%. However, IPNB is known to often recur in other parts of the bile duct. Nevertheless, its mechanism remains...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yuki Nakayama, Takahiro Tomino, Mizuki Ninomiya, Ryosuke Minagawa, Yumi Oshiro, Takuma Izumi, Daisuke Taniguchi, Kosuke Hirose, Yuichiro Kajiwara, Kazuhito Minami, Takashi Nishizaki
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: SpringerOpen 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/c2188df211ba4b76963d02b35dd14ca7
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:c2188df211ba4b76963d02b35dd14ca7
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:c2188df211ba4b76963d02b35dd14ca72021-11-08T11:03:40ZRecurrent intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct due to intraductal dissemination: a case report and literature review10.1186/s40792-021-01318-02198-7793https://doaj.org/article/c2188df211ba4b76963d02b35dd14ca72021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40792-021-01318-0https://doaj.org/toc/2198-7793Abstract Background Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct (IPNB) is a subtype of biliary tumor. The 5-year survival rate of patients with IPNB who underwent curative resection is 81%. However, IPNB is known to often recur in other parts of the bile duct. Nevertheless, its mechanism remains poorly understood. Herein, we report the case of a patient with recurrent IPNB, which was considered to be attributed to intraductal dissemination in the common bile duct at 12 months after curative resection. We also made a review of the existing literature. Case presentation A 69-year-old man was referred to our hospital for the evaluation and dilation of an intrahepatic bile duct (IHBD) mass. Computed tomography (CT) findings confirmed a mass in the left hepatic duct. Left trisectionectomy, extrahepatic bile duct resection with biliary reconstruction, and regional lymph node dissection were performed. Intraoperative examination of the resection margin at the common bile duct and posterior segmental branch of the hepatic duct was negative for the presence of malignant cells. Histologically, the tumor showed intraductal papillary growth of the mucinous epithelium and was diagnosed as non-invasive IPNB. It had a papillary structure with atypical epithelial cells lined up along the neoplastic fibrovascular stalks. Immunohistochemically, this was as a gastric-type lesion. At 12 postoperative months, CT revealed a 1.5-cm mass in the lower remnant common bile duct. We performed subtotal stomach-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. The tumor exhibited papillary growth and was microscopically and immunohistochemically similar to the first tumor. At approximately 16 months after the patient’s second discharge, CT showed an abdominal mass at the superior mesenteric plexus, which was diagnosed as recurrent IPNB. Chemotherapy is ongoing, and the patient is still alive. In this case, as described in many previous reports, IPNB recurred below the primary lesion in the bile duct. Conclusion Based on our review of previous reports on IPNB recurrence, intraductal dissemination was considered one of the mechanisms underlying recurrence after multicentric development. Considering the high frequency and oncological conversion of recurrence in IPNB, regular follow-up examination is essential to achieve better prognosis in patients with recurrent IPNB.Yuki NakayamaTakahiro TominoMizuki NinomiyaRyosuke MinagawaYumi OshiroTakuma IzumiDaisuke TaniguchiKosuke HiroseYuichiro KajiwaraKazuhito MinamiTakashi NishizakiSpringerOpenarticleIntraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile ductBiliary tumorRecurrenceSurgeryRD1-811ENSurgical Case Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct
Biliary tumor
Recurrence
Surgery
RD1-811
spellingShingle Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct
Biliary tumor
Recurrence
Surgery
RD1-811
Yuki Nakayama
Takahiro Tomino
Mizuki Ninomiya
Ryosuke Minagawa
Yumi Oshiro
Takuma Izumi
Daisuke Taniguchi
Kosuke Hirose
Yuichiro Kajiwara
Kazuhito Minami
Takashi Nishizaki
Recurrent intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct due to intraductal dissemination: a case report and literature review
description Abstract Background Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct (IPNB) is a subtype of biliary tumor. The 5-year survival rate of patients with IPNB who underwent curative resection is 81%. However, IPNB is known to often recur in other parts of the bile duct. Nevertheless, its mechanism remains poorly understood. Herein, we report the case of a patient with recurrent IPNB, which was considered to be attributed to intraductal dissemination in the common bile duct at 12 months after curative resection. We also made a review of the existing literature. Case presentation A 69-year-old man was referred to our hospital for the evaluation and dilation of an intrahepatic bile duct (IHBD) mass. Computed tomography (CT) findings confirmed a mass in the left hepatic duct. Left trisectionectomy, extrahepatic bile duct resection with biliary reconstruction, and regional lymph node dissection were performed. Intraoperative examination of the resection margin at the common bile duct and posterior segmental branch of the hepatic duct was negative for the presence of malignant cells. Histologically, the tumor showed intraductal papillary growth of the mucinous epithelium and was diagnosed as non-invasive IPNB. It had a papillary structure with atypical epithelial cells lined up along the neoplastic fibrovascular stalks. Immunohistochemically, this was as a gastric-type lesion. At 12 postoperative months, CT revealed a 1.5-cm mass in the lower remnant common bile duct. We performed subtotal stomach-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. The tumor exhibited papillary growth and was microscopically and immunohistochemically similar to the first tumor. At approximately 16 months after the patient’s second discharge, CT showed an abdominal mass at the superior mesenteric plexus, which was diagnosed as recurrent IPNB. Chemotherapy is ongoing, and the patient is still alive. In this case, as described in many previous reports, IPNB recurred below the primary lesion in the bile duct. Conclusion Based on our review of previous reports on IPNB recurrence, intraductal dissemination was considered one of the mechanisms underlying recurrence after multicentric development. Considering the high frequency and oncological conversion of recurrence in IPNB, regular follow-up examination is essential to achieve better prognosis in patients with recurrent IPNB.
format article
author Yuki Nakayama
Takahiro Tomino
Mizuki Ninomiya
Ryosuke Minagawa
Yumi Oshiro
Takuma Izumi
Daisuke Taniguchi
Kosuke Hirose
Yuichiro Kajiwara
Kazuhito Minami
Takashi Nishizaki
author_facet Yuki Nakayama
Takahiro Tomino
Mizuki Ninomiya
Ryosuke Minagawa
Yumi Oshiro
Takuma Izumi
Daisuke Taniguchi
Kosuke Hirose
Yuichiro Kajiwara
Kazuhito Minami
Takashi Nishizaki
author_sort Yuki Nakayama
title Recurrent intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct due to intraductal dissemination: a case report and literature review
title_short Recurrent intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct due to intraductal dissemination: a case report and literature review
title_full Recurrent intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct due to intraductal dissemination: a case report and literature review
title_fullStr Recurrent intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct due to intraductal dissemination: a case report and literature review
title_full_unstemmed Recurrent intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct due to intraductal dissemination: a case report and literature review
title_sort recurrent intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct due to intraductal dissemination: a case report and literature review
publisher SpringerOpen
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/c2188df211ba4b76963d02b35dd14ca7
work_keys_str_mv AT yukinakayama recurrentintraductalpapillaryneoplasmofthebileductduetointraductaldisseminationacasereportandliteraturereview
AT takahirotomino recurrentintraductalpapillaryneoplasmofthebileductduetointraductaldisseminationacasereportandliteraturereview
AT mizukininomiya recurrentintraductalpapillaryneoplasmofthebileductduetointraductaldisseminationacasereportandliteraturereview
AT ryosukeminagawa recurrentintraductalpapillaryneoplasmofthebileductduetointraductaldisseminationacasereportandliteraturereview
AT yumioshiro recurrentintraductalpapillaryneoplasmofthebileductduetointraductaldisseminationacasereportandliteraturereview
AT takumaizumi recurrentintraductalpapillaryneoplasmofthebileductduetointraductaldisseminationacasereportandliteraturereview
AT daisuketaniguchi recurrentintraductalpapillaryneoplasmofthebileductduetointraductaldisseminationacasereportandliteraturereview
AT kosukehirose recurrentintraductalpapillaryneoplasmofthebileductduetointraductaldisseminationacasereportandliteraturereview
AT yuichirokajiwara recurrentintraductalpapillaryneoplasmofthebileductduetointraductaldisseminationacasereportandliteraturereview
AT kazuhitominami recurrentintraductalpapillaryneoplasmofthebileductduetointraductaldisseminationacasereportandliteraturereview
AT takashinishizaki recurrentintraductalpapillaryneoplasmofthebileductduetointraductaldisseminationacasereportandliteraturereview
_version_ 1718442466746564608