Comparison of classical nucleation theory and modern theory of phase transition in the case of electrochemical nucleation

Electrodeposition of nanostructures has been considered in terms of the classical Gibbs and the Cahn–Hilliard–Hillert theories. Agreement between the Cahn–Hilliard–Hillert and Gibbs theories has been obtained. Therefore, there is no contradiction between the Cahn–Hilliard– Hillert and Gibbs theories...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Baranov, Serghei
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	D.Ghitu Institute of Electronic Engineering and Nanotechnologies 2016
Materias:	Physics QC1-999 Electronics TK7800-8360
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/c2be98954c9f4d28a8943ce167eb730c
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:c2be98954c9f4d28a8943ce167eb730c
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:c2be98954c9f4d28a8943ce167eb730c2021-11-21T11:57:31ZComparison of classical nucleation theory and modern theory of phase transition in the case of electrochemical nucleation544.22537-63651810-648Xhttps://doaj.org/article/c2be98954c9f4d28a8943ce167eb730c2016-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://mjps.nanotech.md/archive/2016/article/50390https://doaj.org/toc/1810-648Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2537-6365Electrodeposition of nanostructures has been considered in terms of the classical Gibbs and the Cahn–Hilliard–Hillert theories. Agreement between the Cahn–Hilliard–Hillert and Gibbs theories has been obtained. Therefore, there is no contradiction between the Cahn–Hilliard– Hillert and Gibbs theories. Baranov, SergheiD.Ghitu Institute of Electronic Engineering and NanotechnologiesarticlePhysicsQC1-999ElectronicsTK7800-8360ENMoldavian Journal of the Physical Sciences, Vol 15, Iss 3-4, Pp 225-230 (2016)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Physics QC1-999 Electronics TK7800-8360
spellingShingle	Physics QC1-999 Electronics TK7800-8360 Baranov, Serghei Comparison of classical nucleation theory and modern theory of phase transition in the case of electrochemical nucleation
description	Electrodeposition of nanostructures has been considered in terms of the classical Gibbs and the Cahn–Hilliard–Hillert theories. Agreement between the Cahn–Hilliard–Hillert and Gibbs theories has been obtained. Therefore, there is no contradiction between the Cahn–Hilliard– Hillert and Gibbs theories.
format	article
author	Baranov, Serghei
author_facet	Baranov, Serghei
author_sort	Baranov, Serghei
title	Comparison of classical nucleation theory and modern theory of phase transition in the case of electrochemical nucleation
title_short	Comparison of classical nucleation theory and modern theory of phase transition in the case of electrochemical nucleation
title_full	Comparison of classical nucleation theory and modern theory of phase transition in the case of electrochemical nucleation
title_fullStr	Comparison of classical nucleation theory and modern theory of phase transition in the case of electrochemical nucleation
title_full_unstemmed	Comparison of classical nucleation theory and modern theory of phase transition in the case of electrochemical nucleation
title_sort	comparison of classical nucleation theory and modern theory of phase transition in the case of electrochemical nucleation
publisher	D.Ghitu Institute of Electronic Engineering and Nanotechnologies
publishDate	2016
url	https://doaj.org/article/c2be98954c9f4d28a8943ce167eb730c
work_keys_str_mv	AT baranovserghei comparisonofclassicalnucleationtheoryandmoderntheoryofphasetransitioninthecaseofelectrochemicalnucleation
_version_	1718419388759015424

Comparison of classical nucleation theory and modern theory of phase transition in the case of electrochemical nucleation

Ejemplares similares