Comparison of classical nucleation theory and modern theory of phase transition in the case of electrochemical nucleation
Electrodeposition of nanostructures has been considered in terms of the classical Gibbs and the Cahn–Hilliard–Hillert theories. Agreement between the Cahn–Hilliard–Hillert and Gibbs theories has been obtained. Therefore, there is no contradiction between the Cahn–Hilliard– Hillert and Gibbs theories...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | Baranov, Serghei |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
D.Ghitu Institute of Electronic Engineering and Nanotechnologies
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/c2be98954c9f4d28a8943ce167eb730c |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
A new theory of electrochemical nucleation
por: Baranov, Serghei
Publicado: (2014) -
Theory of nucleation
por: Baranov, Serghei
Publicado: (2006) -
Investigation of orientation magnetic phase transition for use in ultrafast optomagnetic bistable effects
por: Baranov, Serghei, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Computational study of non-stationary cluster size distribution and rate of nucleation in case of pre-existing clusters
por: Gamurari, Visarion, et al.
Publicado: (2006) -
On some achievements of Moldovan physics and priorities in the formation of modern directions of the condensed matter theory
por: Palistrant, Maria, et al.
Publicado: (2018)