Fighting Hate Speech through EU Law

<p>This article explores the rise of the European ‘First Amendment’ beyond national and Strasbourg law, offering a fresh look into the previously under-theorised issue of hate speech in EU law. Building its argument on (1) the scrutiny of fundamental rights protection, (2) the distinct...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Uladzislau Belavusau
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Amsterdam Law Forum 2012
Materias:	EU law non-discrimination hate speech fundamental rights protection freedom of expression race theory ECJ European integration Law K
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/c2cc73fdf8474a279eb6685ace581710
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:c2cc73fdf8474a279eb6685ace581710
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:c2cc73fdf8474a279eb6685ace5817102021-12-02T01:18:56ZFighting Hate Speech through EU Law1876-8156https://doaj.org/article/c2cc73fdf8474a279eb6685ace5817102012-02-01T00:00:00Zhttp://ojs.ubvu.vu.nl/alf/article/view/253https://doaj.org/toc/1876-8156<p>This article explores the rise of the European ‘First Amendment’ beyond national and Strasbourg law, offering a fresh look into the previously under-theorised issue of hate speech in EU law. Building its argument on (1) the scrutiny of fundamental rights protection, (2) the distinction between commercial and non-commercial speech, and, finally, (3) the looking glass of <em>critical race theory</em>, the paper demonstrates how the judgment of the ECJ in the <em>Feryn</em> case implicitly<em> </em>consolidated legal narratives on hate speech in Europe. In this way, the paper reconstructs the dominant European theory of freedom of expression via rhetorical and victim-centered constitutional analysis, bearing important ethical implications for European integration.</p><p> </p>Uladzislau BelavusauAmsterdam Law ForumarticleEU lawnon-discriminationhate speechfundamental rights protectionfreedom of expressionrace theoryECJEuropean integrationLawKENAmsterdam Law Forum, Vol 4, Iss 1, Pp 20-35 (2012)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	EU law non-discrimination hate speech fundamental rights protection freedom of expression race theory ECJ European integration Law K
spellingShingle	EU law non-discrimination hate speech fundamental rights protection freedom of expression race theory ECJ European integration Law K Uladzislau Belavusau Fighting Hate Speech through EU Law
description	<p>This article explores the rise of the European ‘First Amendment’ beyond national and Strasbourg law, offering a fresh look into the previously under-theorised issue of hate speech in EU law. Building its argument on (1) the scrutiny of fundamental rights protection, (2) the distinction between commercial and non-commercial speech, and, finally, (3) the looking glass of <em>critical race theory</em>, the paper demonstrates how the judgment of the ECJ in the <em>Feryn</em> case implicitly<em> </em>consolidated legal narratives on hate speech in Europe. In this way, the paper reconstructs the dominant European theory of freedom of expression via rhetorical and victim-centered constitutional analysis, bearing important ethical implications for European integration.</p><p> </p>
format	article
author	Uladzislau Belavusau
author_facet	Uladzislau Belavusau
author_sort	Uladzislau Belavusau
title	Fighting Hate Speech through EU Law
title_short	Fighting Hate Speech through EU Law
title_full	Fighting Hate Speech through EU Law
title_fullStr	Fighting Hate Speech through EU Law
title_full_unstemmed	Fighting Hate Speech through EU Law
title_sort	fighting hate speech through eu law
publisher	Amsterdam Law Forum
publishDate	2012
url	https://doaj.org/article/c2cc73fdf8474a279eb6685ace581710
work_keys_str_mv	AT uladzislaubelavusau fightinghatespeechthrougheulaw
_version_	1718403161008373760

Fighting Hate Speech through EU Law

Ejemplares similares