A Superação do Desenvolvimento pelo Dinamismo do Envolvimento Rural

Discussions about countryside, urban-industrial or national State development, contains an ideological function incorporated tacitly aimed at sustaining the hegemonic domination of the central countries and the diffusion of their lifestyle to peripheral countries. The process of agricultural moderni...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Claudio Eduardo Silva Nadaleto
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	PT
Publicado:	Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul 2013
Materias:	agricultural development rurality rural involvement Economic growth, development, planning HD72-88
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/c2cd628636c74d1b9920b3eab857288a
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:c2cd628636c74d1b9920b3eab857288a
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:c2cd628636c74d1b9920b3eab857288a2021-11-11T15:16:05ZA Superação do Desenvolvimento pelo Dinamismo do Envolvimento Rural1678-48552237-6453https://doaj.org/article/c2cd628636c74d1b9920b3eab857288a2013-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=75229296004https://doaj.org/toc/1678-4855https://doaj.org/toc/2237-6453Discussions about countryside, urban-industrial or national State development, contains an ideological function incorporated tacitly aimed at sustaining the hegemonic domination of the central countries and the diffusion of their lifestyle to peripheral countries. The process of agricultural modernization, built in Brazil since the decade of 1960, resulted in the partial disarticulation of the household ways to do agriculture and all of their sociability, moral economy, cultural tradition and relationship with nature. Therefore, it was partially successful in (un)involve the countryside, disaggregating part of the peasant and household ways of life in exchange for the production of fewer goods made by business farmers. Researchers, who have followed this process and interpreted it, gave it the name of agricultural development. But after they find in 90 years that this model didn ́t brought advances and did regression to the countryside and the cities, they began to theorize from new approaches and on other actors, thus forming what is called rural development. However, even with the fresh look for recognition of the role of household and peasant forms to make agriculture and by the appreciation of the rural diversity, the myth of development still permeates the debates. In this sense, this paper seeks to show that it is more appropriate to analyze the new rurality with the concept “rural involvement” instead of maintaining the inappropriate term “development”.Claudio Eduardo Silva NadaletoUniversidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sularticleagricultural developmentruralityrural involvementEconomic growth, development, planningHD72-88PTDesenvolvimento em Questão, Vol 11, Iss 24, Pp 74-109 (2013)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	PT
topic	agricultural development rurality rural involvement Economic growth, development, planning HD72-88
spellingShingle	agricultural development rurality rural involvement Economic growth, development, planning HD72-88 Claudio Eduardo Silva Nadaleto A Superação do Desenvolvimento pelo Dinamismo do Envolvimento Rural
description	Discussions about countryside, urban-industrial or national State development, contains an ideological function incorporated tacitly aimed at sustaining the hegemonic domination of the central countries and the diffusion of their lifestyle to peripheral countries. The process of agricultural modernization, built in Brazil since the decade of 1960, resulted in the partial disarticulation of the household ways to do agriculture and all of their sociability, moral economy, cultural tradition and relationship with nature. Therefore, it was partially successful in (un)involve the countryside, disaggregating part of the peasant and household ways of life in exchange for the production of fewer goods made by business farmers. Researchers, who have followed this process and interpreted it, gave it the name of agricultural development. But after they find in 90 years that this model didn ́t brought advances and did regression to the countryside and the cities, they began to theorize from new approaches and on other actors, thus forming what is called rural development. However, even with the fresh look for recognition of the role of household and peasant forms to make agriculture and by the appreciation of the rural diversity, the myth of development still permeates the debates. In this sense, this paper seeks to show that it is more appropriate to analyze the new rurality with the concept “rural involvement” instead of maintaining the inappropriate term “development”.
format	article
author	Claudio Eduardo Silva Nadaleto
author_facet	Claudio Eduardo Silva Nadaleto
author_sort	Claudio Eduardo Silva Nadaleto
title	A Superação do Desenvolvimento pelo Dinamismo do Envolvimento Rural
title_short	A Superação do Desenvolvimento pelo Dinamismo do Envolvimento Rural
title_full	A Superação do Desenvolvimento pelo Dinamismo do Envolvimento Rural
title_fullStr	A Superação do Desenvolvimento pelo Dinamismo do Envolvimento Rural
title_full_unstemmed	A Superação do Desenvolvimento pelo Dinamismo do Envolvimento Rural
title_sort	superação do desenvolvimento pelo dinamismo do envolvimento rural
publisher	Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul
publishDate	2013
url	https://doaj.org/article/c2cd628636c74d1b9920b3eab857288a
work_keys_str_mv	AT claudioeduardosilvanadaleto asuperacaododesenvolvimentopelodinamismodoenvolvimentorural AT claudioeduardosilvanadaleto superacaododesenvolvimentopelodinamismodoenvolvimentorural
_version_	1718435930971308032

A Superação do Desenvolvimento pelo Dinamismo do Envolvimento Rural

Ejemplares similares