Deliberation level of constitutional debates in Georgian Parliament

In the given paper a discourse quality index (DQI) tool, rooted to criteria elaborated by Jurgen Habermas’s in his discourse ethics, will be modified and used to assess the deliberation level of the 1995 Georgian Parliament. The methodology will accurately represent important principles of deliberat...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Napetvaridze Vladimeri, Tskhovrebadze Tina, Niparishvili Tamila, Niparishvili Kristina
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	CS EN SK
Publicado:	Sciendo 2020
Materias:	deliberation discourse measurement parliamentary debate georgia constitution Political science J
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/c2d2d10754f64a86b27af9b0c615f7a0
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:c2d2d10754f64a86b27af9b0c615f7a0
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:c2d2d10754f64a86b27af9b0c615f7a02021-12-02T15:27:56ZDeliberation level of constitutional debates in Georgian Parliament1801-342210.2478/pce-2020-0014https://doaj.org/article/c2d2d10754f64a86b27af9b0c615f7a02020-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.2478/pce-2020-0014https://doaj.org/toc/1801-3422In the given paper a discourse quality index (DQI) tool, rooted to criteria elaborated by Jurgen Habermas’s in his discourse ethics, will be modified and used to assess the deliberation level of the 1995 Georgian Parliament. The methodology will accurately represent important principles of deliberation. Due to its focus on observable behavior and its detailed coding instructions, a discourse quality index can be a reliable measurement of the quality of political debates. The DQI for a parliamentary debate in the example of the 1995 parliament of Georgia will be illustrated in the given article. The parliamentarian debates concerning the adoption of the 1995 constitution of Georgia, according to its importance, will be taken as the specific case to be analysed. In the framework of the research, scholars will study and analyse over 200 pages of stenographic recordings of the parliamentary debates connected to the mentioned topic. The DQI score will be evaluated based on the analyses of the stenographic records.Napetvaridze VladimeriTskhovrebadze TinaNiparishvili TamilaNiparishvili KristinaSciendoarticledeliberationdiscoursemeasurementparliamentary debategeorgiaconstitutionPolitical scienceJCSENSKPolitics in Central Europe, Vol 16, Iss 1, Pp 309-325 (2020)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	CS EN SK
topic	deliberation discourse measurement parliamentary debate georgia constitution Political science J
spellingShingle	deliberation discourse measurement parliamentary debate georgia constitution Political science J Napetvaridze Vladimeri Tskhovrebadze Tina Niparishvili Tamila Niparishvili Kristina Deliberation level of constitutional debates in Georgian Parliament
description	In the given paper a discourse quality index (DQI) tool, rooted to criteria elaborated by Jurgen Habermas’s in his discourse ethics, will be modified and used to assess the deliberation level of the 1995 Georgian Parliament. The methodology will accurately represent important principles of deliberation. Due to its focus on observable behavior and its detailed coding instructions, a discourse quality index can be a reliable measurement of the quality of political debates. The DQI for a parliamentary debate in the example of the 1995 parliament of Georgia will be illustrated in the given article. The parliamentarian debates concerning the adoption of the 1995 constitution of Georgia, according to its importance, will be taken as the specific case to be analysed. In the framework of the research, scholars will study and analyse over 200 pages of stenographic recordings of the parliamentary debates connected to the mentioned topic. The DQI score will be evaluated based on the analyses of the stenographic records.
format	article
author	Napetvaridze Vladimeri Tskhovrebadze Tina Niparishvili Tamila Niparishvili Kristina
author_facet	Napetvaridze Vladimeri Tskhovrebadze Tina Niparishvili Tamila Niparishvili Kristina
author_sort	Napetvaridze Vladimeri
title	Deliberation level of constitutional debates in Georgian Parliament
title_short	Deliberation level of constitutional debates in Georgian Parliament
title_full	Deliberation level of constitutional debates in Georgian Parliament
title_fullStr	Deliberation level of constitutional debates in Georgian Parliament
title_full_unstemmed	Deliberation level of constitutional debates in Georgian Parliament
title_sort	deliberation level of constitutional debates in georgian parliament
publisher	Sciendo
publishDate	2020
url	https://doaj.org/article/c2d2d10754f64a86b27af9b0c615f7a0
work_keys_str_mv	AT napetvaridzevladimeri deliberationlevelofconstitutionaldebatesingeorgianparliament AT tskhovrebadzetina deliberationlevelofconstitutionaldebatesingeorgianparliament AT niparishvilitamila deliberationlevelofconstitutionaldebatesingeorgianparliament AT niparishvilikristina deliberationlevelofconstitutionaldebatesingeorgianparliament
_version_	1718387227104378880

Deliberation level of constitutional debates in Georgian Parliament

Ejemplares similares