Deliberation level of constitutional debates in Georgian Parliament
In the given paper a discourse quality index (DQI) tool, rooted to criteria elaborated by Jurgen Habermas’s in his discourse ethics, will be modified and used to assess the deliberation level of the 1995 Georgian Parliament. The methodology will accurately represent important principles of deliberat...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Napetvaridze Vladimeri, Tskhovrebadze Tina, Niparishvili Tamila, Niparishvili Kristina |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | CS EN SK |
Publicado: |
Sciendo
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/c2d2d10754f64a86b27af9b0c615f7a0 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Disrespect in Online Deliberation: Inducing Factors and Democratic Potentials
por: SARMENTO,RAYZA, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
THE CHILEAN PARLIAMENTARY PRESIDENCY UNDER THE POLITICAL CONSTITUTION OF 1925: A REGULATORY AND INSTITUTIONAL STUDY
por: Obando Camino,Iván
Publicado: (2016) -
The “Debate” about Poland
por: Jessica Sofizade
Publicado: (2019) - Contemporary argumentation and debate the journal of the Cross Examination Debate Association.
-
Humor as a branding strategy in political discourse: A case study from Romania
por: Săftoiu,Răzvan, et al.
Publicado: (2014)