Deliberation level of constitutional debates in Georgian Parliament
In the given paper a discourse quality index (DQI) tool, rooted to criteria elaborated by Jurgen Habermas’s in his discourse ethics, will be modified and used to assess the deliberation level of the 1995 Georgian Parliament. The methodology will accurately represent important principles of deliberat...
Enregistré dans:
Auteurs principaux: | Napetvaridze Vladimeri, Tskhovrebadze Tina, Niparishvili Tamila, Niparishvili Kristina |
---|---|
Format: | article |
Langue: | CS EN SK |
Publié: |
Sciendo
2020
|
Sujets: | |
Accès en ligne: | https://doaj.org/article/c2d2d10754f64a86b27af9b0c615f7a0 |
Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
Documents similaires
-
Disrespect in Online Deliberation: Inducing Factors and Democratic Potentials
par: SARMENTO,RAYZA, et autres
Publié: (2016) -
THE CHILEAN PARLIAMENTARY PRESIDENCY UNDER THE POLITICAL CONSTITUTION OF 1925: A REGULATORY AND INSTITUTIONAL STUDY
par: Obando Camino,Iván
Publié: (2016) -
The “Debate” about Poland
par: Jessica Sofizade
Publié: (2019) - Contemporary argumentation and debate the journal of the Cross Examination Debate Association.
-
Humor as a branding strategy in political discourse: A case study from Romania
par: Săftoiu,Răzvan, et autres
Publié: (2014)