Deliberation level of constitutional debates in Georgian Parliament
In the given paper a discourse quality index (DQI) tool, rooted to criteria elaborated by Jurgen Habermas’s in his discourse ethics, will be modified and used to assess the deliberation level of the 1995 Georgian Parliament. The methodology will accurately represent important principles of deliberat...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Napetvaridze Vladimeri, Tskhovrebadze Tina, Niparishvili Tamila, Niparishvili Kristina |
---|---|
Format: | article |
Language: | CS EN SK |
Published: |
Sciendo
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doaj.org/article/c2d2d10754f64a86b27af9b0c615f7a0 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Disrespect in Online Deliberation: Inducing Factors and Democratic Potentials
by: SARMENTO,RAYZA, et al.
Published: (2016) -
THE CHILEAN PARLIAMENTARY PRESIDENCY UNDER THE POLITICAL CONSTITUTION OF 1925: A REGULATORY AND INSTITUTIONAL STUDY
by: Obando Camino,Iván
Published: (2016) -
The “Debate” about Poland
by: Jessica Sofizade
Published: (2019) - Contemporary argumentation and debate the journal of the Cross Examination Debate Association.
-
Humor as a branding strategy in political discourse: A case study from Romania
by: Săftoiu,Răzvan, et al.
Published: (2014)