The effect of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion compared with sham operation: study protocol of a prospective double-blinded multicenter randomized controlled trial
Background and purpose — The sacroiliac joint is increasingly recognized as a cause of pain in 15–30% of patients with low back pain. Nonoperative management is not always successful and surgical treatment with fusion of the joint is increasingly recommended. According to the literature, minimally i...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Engelke Marie Randers, Paul Gerdhem, Jon Dahl, Britt Stuge, Thomas Johan Kibsgård |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/c2d88683133c4ad29a90b49aaa2498f7 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Comparative effectiveness of open versus minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion
por: Ledonio CGT, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Minimally invasive arthrodesis for chronic sacroiliac joint dysfunction using the SImmetry SI Joint Fusion system
por: Miller LE, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
One-year outcomes after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion with a series of triangular implants: a multicenter, patient-level analysis
por: Sachs D, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Safety and 6-month effectiveness of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: a prospective study
por: Duhon BS, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Four-year outcomes after minimally invasive transiliac sacroiliac joint fusion with triangular titanium implants
por: Darr E, et al.
Publicado: (2018)