REASONS OF CONFLICTS IN TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL: A CROSS SECTIONAL STUDY

Objective: To assess the reasons of conflicts in tertiary care hospital Rawalpindi. Study Design: Cross sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Tertiary care hospital Rawalpindi, from Aug 2008 to Jul 2009. Methodology: Hospital staff comprising of health administrators, clinicians, nu...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tahir Sardar, Muhammad Alamgir Khan, Muhammad Naveed Akhtar, Arshad Gul
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Army Medical College Rawalpindi 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/c2fa0d722c9f49d9bef280238d71533a
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:c2fa0d722c9f49d9bef280238d71533a
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:c2fa0d722c9f49d9bef280238d71533a2021-12-02T18:44:47ZREASONS OF CONFLICTS IN TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL: A CROSS SECTIONAL STUDY0030-96482411-884210.51253/pafmj.v71i2.6654https://doaj.org/article/c2fa0d722c9f49d9bef280238d71533a2021-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://pafmj.org/index.php/PAFMJ/article/view/6654https://doaj.org/toc/0030-9648https://doaj.org/toc/2411-8842Objective: To assess the reasons of conflicts in tertiary care hospital Rawalpindi. Study Design: Cross sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Tertiary care hospital Rawalpindi, from Aug 2008 to Jul 2009. Methodology: Hospital staff comprising of health administrators, clinicians, nurses and paramedics working in tertiary care hospital Rawalpindi were included in the study. Results: These questions were asked to assess the general understanding of the respondents regarding the subject of conflicts to deduct their possible response in conflict situations. As per "Traditional" view conflict was considered as dysfunctional, destructive and irrational. The "Human relations view" describes conflict as natural, suggests tolerating it whereas the latest “inter-actionist view” defines conflict as a means for keeping us viable and creative, and suggests encouraging it. Average 44% of the respondents, mainly administrators and clinicians have fair idea regarding current concept of conflict. Conclusion: Clinical and administrative staffs of hospitals are like parts of a train track. The irrational relationship between them will result in distortion and lower quality of services. Therefore, effective strategies to decrease staffs‟ experience of conflict need to be developed. This might create a healthier and more productive work environment which positively affects the care quality.Tahir SardarMuhammad Alamgir KhanMuhammad Naveed AkhtarArshad GulArmy Medical College Rawalpindiarticleadministrative staffclinical staffconflict causesconflict managementtertiary care hospitalMedicineRMedicine (General)R5-920ENPakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal, Vol 71, Iss 2, Pp 382-86 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic administrative staff
clinical staff
conflict causes
conflict management
tertiary care hospital
Medicine
R
Medicine (General)
R5-920
spellingShingle administrative staff
clinical staff
conflict causes
conflict management
tertiary care hospital
Medicine
R
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Tahir Sardar
Muhammad Alamgir Khan
Muhammad Naveed Akhtar
Arshad Gul
REASONS OF CONFLICTS IN TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL: A CROSS SECTIONAL STUDY
description Objective: To assess the reasons of conflicts in tertiary care hospital Rawalpindi. Study Design: Cross sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Tertiary care hospital Rawalpindi, from Aug 2008 to Jul 2009. Methodology: Hospital staff comprising of health administrators, clinicians, nurses and paramedics working in tertiary care hospital Rawalpindi were included in the study. Results: These questions were asked to assess the general understanding of the respondents regarding the subject of conflicts to deduct their possible response in conflict situations. As per "Traditional" view conflict was considered as dysfunctional, destructive and irrational. The "Human relations view" describes conflict as natural, suggests tolerating it whereas the latest “inter-actionist view” defines conflict as a means for keeping us viable and creative, and suggests encouraging it. Average 44% of the respondents, mainly administrators and clinicians have fair idea regarding current concept of conflict. Conclusion: Clinical and administrative staffs of hospitals are like parts of a train track. The irrational relationship between them will result in distortion and lower quality of services. Therefore, effective strategies to decrease staffs‟ experience of conflict need to be developed. This might create a healthier and more productive work environment which positively affects the care quality.
format article
author Tahir Sardar
Muhammad Alamgir Khan
Muhammad Naveed Akhtar
Arshad Gul
author_facet Tahir Sardar
Muhammad Alamgir Khan
Muhammad Naveed Akhtar
Arshad Gul
author_sort Tahir Sardar
title REASONS OF CONFLICTS IN TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL: A CROSS SECTIONAL STUDY
title_short REASONS OF CONFLICTS IN TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL: A CROSS SECTIONAL STUDY
title_full REASONS OF CONFLICTS IN TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL: A CROSS SECTIONAL STUDY
title_fullStr REASONS OF CONFLICTS IN TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL: A CROSS SECTIONAL STUDY
title_full_unstemmed REASONS OF CONFLICTS IN TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL: A CROSS SECTIONAL STUDY
title_sort reasons of conflicts in tertiary care hospital: a cross sectional study
publisher Army Medical College Rawalpindi
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/c2fa0d722c9f49d9bef280238d71533a
work_keys_str_mv AT tahirsardar reasonsofconflictsintertiarycarehospitalacrosssectionalstudy
AT muhammadalamgirkhan reasonsofconflictsintertiarycarehospitalacrosssectionalstudy
AT muhammadnaveedakhtar reasonsofconflictsintertiarycarehospitalacrosssectionalstudy
AT arshadgul reasonsofconflictsintertiarycarehospitalacrosssectionalstudy
_version_ 1718377704376500224