Investigating Algorithmic Misconceptions in a Media Context: Source of a New Digital Divide?

Algorithms are widely used in our data-driven media landscape. Many misconceptions have arisen about how these algorithms work and what they can do. In this study, we conducted a large representative survey (N = 2,106) in the Netherlands to explore algorithmic misconceptions. Results showed that a s...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brahim Zarouali, Natali Helberger, Claes H. de Vreese
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Cogitatio 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/c3289630fea746b4b735f4d0af143d88
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:c3289630fea746b4b735f4d0af143d88
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:c3289630fea746b4b735f4d0af143d882021-11-18T11:14:12ZInvestigating Algorithmic Misconceptions in a Media Context: Source of a New Digital Divide?2183-243910.17645/mac.v9i4.4090https://doaj.org/article/c3289630fea746b4b735f4d0af143d882021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/4090https://doaj.org/toc/2183-2439Algorithms are widely used in our data-driven media landscape. Many misconceptions have arisen about how these algorithms work and what they can do. In this study, we conducted a large representative survey (N = 2,106) in the Netherlands to explore algorithmic misconceptions. Results showed that a significant part of the general population holds (multiple) misconceptions about algorithms in the media. We found that erroneous beliefs about algorithms are more common among (1) older people (vs. younger people), (2) lower-educated people (vs. higher-educated), and (3) women (vs. men). In addition, it was found that people who had no specific sources to inform themselves about algorithms, and those relying on their friends/family for information, were more likely to have algorithmic misconceptions. Conversely, media channels, school, and having one’s own (online) experiences were found to be sources associated with having fewer algorithmic misconceptions. Theoretical implications are formulated in the context of algorithmic awareness and the digital divide. Finally, societal implications are discussed, such as the need for algorithmic literacy initiatives.Brahim ZaroualiNatali HelbergerClaes H. de VreeseCogitatioarticlealgorithmsalgorithmic awarenessdigital dividemisconceptionstechnologyCommunication. Mass mediaP87-96ENMedia and Communication, Vol 9, Iss 4, Pp 134-144 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic algorithms
algorithmic awareness
digital divide
misconceptions
technology
Communication. Mass media
P87-96
spellingShingle algorithms
algorithmic awareness
digital divide
misconceptions
technology
Communication. Mass media
P87-96
Brahim Zarouali
Natali Helberger
Claes H. de Vreese
Investigating Algorithmic Misconceptions in a Media Context: Source of a New Digital Divide?
description Algorithms are widely used in our data-driven media landscape. Many misconceptions have arisen about how these algorithms work and what they can do. In this study, we conducted a large representative survey (N = 2,106) in the Netherlands to explore algorithmic misconceptions. Results showed that a significant part of the general population holds (multiple) misconceptions about algorithms in the media. We found that erroneous beliefs about algorithms are more common among (1) older people (vs. younger people), (2) lower-educated people (vs. higher-educated), and (3) women (vs. men). In addition, it was found that people who had no specific sources to inform themselves about algorithms, and those relying on their friends/family for information, were more likely to have algorithmic misconceptions. Conversely, media channels, school, and having one’s own (online) experiences were found to be sources associated with having fewer algorithmic misconceptions. Theoretical implications are formulated in the context of algorithmic awareness and the digital divide. Finally, societal implications are discussed, such as the need for algorithmic literacy initiatives.
format article
author Brahim Zarouali
Natali Helberger
Claes H. de Vreese
author_facet Brahim Zarouali
Natali Helberger
Claes H. de Vreese
author_sort Brahim Zarouali
title Investigating Algorithmic Misconceptions in a Media Context: Source of a New Digital Divide?
title_short Investigating Algorithmic Misconceptions in a Media Context: Source of a New Digital Divide?
title_full Investigating Algorithmic Misconceptions in a Media Context: Source of a New Digital Divide?
title_fullStr Investigating Algorithmic Misconceptions in a Media Context: Source of a New Digital Divide?
title_full_unstemmed Investigating Algorithmic Misconceptions in a Media Context: Source of a New Digital Divide?
title_sort investigating algorithmic misconceptions in a media context: source of a new digital divide?
publisher Cogitatio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/c3289630fea746b4b735f4d0af143d88
work_keys_str_mv AT brahimzarouali investigatingalgorithmicmisconceptionsinamediacontextsourceofanewdigitaldivide
AT natalihelberger investigatingalgorithmicmisconceptionsinamediacontextsourceofanewdigitaldivide
AT claeshdevreese investigatingalgorithmicmisconceptionsinamediacontextsourceofanewdigitaldivide
_version_ 1718420869368250368