Correlates of research effort in carnivores: body size, range size and diet matter.

Given the budgetary restrictions on scientific research and the increasing need to better inform conservation actions, it is important to identify the patterns and causes of biases in research effort. We combine bibliometric information from a literature review of almost 16,500 peer-reviewed publica...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zoe M Brooke, Jon Bielby, Kate Nambiar, Chris Carbone
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/c357edd2fd5548659187c41dd4bd306a
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:c357edd2fd5548659187c41dd4bd306a
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:c357edd2fd5548659187c41dd4bd306a2021-11-18T08:25:17ZCorrelates of research effort in carnivores: body size, range size and diet matter.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0093195https://doaj.org/article/c357edd2fd5548659187c41dd4bd306a2014-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24695422/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Given the budgetary restrictions on scientific research and the increasing need to better inform conservation actions, it is important to identify the patterns and causes of biases in research effort. We combine bibliometric information from a literature review of almost 16,500 peer-reviewed publications on a well-known group of 286 species, the Order Carnivora, with global datasets on species' life history and ecological traits to explore patterns in research effort. Our study explores how species' characteristics influenced the degree to which they were studied (measured as the number of publications). We identified a wide variation in intensity of research effort at both Family and Species levels, with some of the least studied being those which may need protection in future. Our findings hint at the complex role of human perspectives in setting research agendas. We found that better-studied species tended to be large-bodied and have a large geographic range whilst omnivory had a negative relationship with research effort. IUCN threat status did not exhibit a strong relationship with research effort which suggests that the conservation needs of individual species are not major drivers of research interest. This work is the first to use a combination of bibliometric analysis and biological data to quantify and interpret gaps in research knowledge across an entire Order. Our results could be combined with other resources, such as Biodiversity Action Plans, to prioritise and co-ordinate future research effort, whilst our methods can be applied across many scientific disciplines to describe knowledge gaps.Zoe M BrookeJon BielbyKate NambiarChris CarbonePublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 9, Iss 4, p e93195 (2014)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Zoe M Brooke
Jon Bielby
Kate Nambiar
Chris Carbone
Correlates of research effort in carnivores: body size, range size and diet matter.
description Given the budgetary restrictions on scientific research and the increasing need to better inform conservation actions, it is important to identify the patterns and causes of biases in research effort. We combine bibliometric information from a literature review of almost 16,500 peer-reviewed publications on a well-known group of 286 species, the Order Carnivora, with global datasets on species' life history and ecological traits to explore patterns in research effort. Our study explores how species' characteristics influenced the degree to which they were studied (measured as the number of publications). We identified a wide variation in intensity of research effort at both Family and Species levels, with some of the least studied being those which may need protection in future. Our findings hint at the complex role of human perspectives in setting research agendas. We found that better-studied species tended to be large-bodied and have a large geographic range whilst omnivory had a negative relationship with research effort. IUCN threat status did not exhibit a strong relationship with research effort which suggests that the conservation needs of individual species are not major drivers of research interest. This work is the first to use a combination of bibliometric analysis and biological data to quantify and interpret gaps in research knowledge across an entire Order. Our results could be combined with other resources, such as Biodiversity Action Plans, to prioritise and co-ordinate future research effort, whilst our methods can be applied across many scientific disciplines to describe knowledge gaps.
format article
author Zoe M Brooke
Jon Bielby
Kate Nambiar
Chris Carbone
author_facet Zoe M Brooke
Jon Bielby
Kate Nambiar
Chris Carbone
author_sort Zoe M Brooke
title Correlates of research effort in carnivores: body size, range size and diet matter.
title_short Correlates of research effort in carnivores: body size, range size and diet matter.
title_full Correlates of research effort in carnivores: body size, range size and diet matter.
title_fullStr Correlates of research effort in carnivores: body size, range size and diet matter.
title_full_unstemmed Correlates of research effort in carnivores: body size, range size and diet matter.
title_sort correlates of research effort in carnivores: body size, range size and diet matter.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2014
url https://doaj.org/article/c357edd2fd5548659187c41dd4bd306a
work_keys_str_mv AT zoembrooke correlatesofresearcheffortincarnivoresbodysizerangesizeanddietmatter
AT jonbielby correlatesofresearcheffortincarnivoresbodysizerangesizeanddietmatter
AT katenambiar correlatesofresearcheffortincarnivoresbodysizerangesizeanddietmatter
AT chriscarbone correlatesofresearcheffortincarnivoresbodysizerangesizeanddietmatter
_version_ 1718421828239622144