Crisis of Regional Leadership and Stagnation of Mega-projects in Asia-Pacific: Consequences for Russia
Analyses of modern trade and economic relations in Asia-Pacific region. Research of the roles of the United States of America and China under the conditions of protectionism initiated by the D. Tramp’s administration and stagnation of mega-projects. Crisis of leadership and role of USA and China in...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN RU |
| Publicado: |
Ассоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”)
2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/c3681ba52a88491586d01133af48f175 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:doaj.org-article:c3681ba52a88491586d01133af48f175 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:c3681ba52a88491586d01133af48f1752021-11-07T14:45:02ZCrisis of Regional Leadership and Stagnation of Mega-projects in Asia-Pacific: Consequences for Russia2542-02402587-932410.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-1-6-25https://doaj.org/article/c3681ba52a88491586d01133af48f1752019-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ogt-journal.com/jour/article/view/401https://doaj.org/toc/2542-0240https://doaj.org/toc/2587-9324Analyses of modern trade and economic relations in Asia-Pacific region. Research of the roles of the United States of America and China under the conditions of protectionism initiated by the D. Tramp’s administration and stagnation of mega-projects. Crisis of leadership and role of USA and China in regional mega-project (APEC, TPP, RCPEC). Ability of the USA and the PRC to create regional economic priorities, as well as to determine the course of integration processes. Analysis of the main obstacles of realization of American and Chinese leadership potential. Regional integration project initiated by Japan, India and the Republic of Korea and prospects for Indo-Pacific Asia. China-USA competition and main trends of regional integration. Comparative study of opportunitiesand prospects for bilateral and mega-regional economic projects. As an example, observation of South Korean initiative “New Economic Map” is presented and analyzed. Role of “New Economic Forum” initiated by Bloomberg with support of global big business is examined also. Initiative of Indo-Pacific region, Japan-India economic cooperation are examined, as well as Washington policy to counterweight China foreign economic and political expansion. Analyzing of prospects and consequences of competition between USA and the PRC in Pacific regions. Main issues, opportunities and challenges of Russia’s economic expansion in Asia-Pacific region. Close interconnection between policy, security and economiccooperation in the region: influence on Russia’s Pacific priorities and diplomacy. Characteristics of some problems of Russian “East Policy” during last several years. Some arguments are presented in favor of Russia’s strategy of “policy of focused partnerships”. This kind of policy means prevail of business activity in some special projects as well as in some geographic areas. It is also stressed that it is in Russia’s long-run interests to use of all kind of diplomatic measures in order to minimize any attempts to oppose India to China. But try its best to support cooperation between Russia, China and India in Pacific, as well as in Indo-Pacific region.A. N. FedorovskyАссоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”)articleasia-pacificindo-pacific regionregional integrationmega-projectsusachinajapanindiathe republic of korearussiaInternational relationsJZ2-6530ENRUКонтуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право, Vol 12, Iss 1, Pp 6-25 (2019) |
| institution |
DOAJ |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
EN RU |
| topic |
asia-pacific indo-pacific region regional integration mega-projects usa china japan india the republic of korea russia International relations JZ2-6530 |
| spellingShingle |
asia-pacific indo-pacific region regional integration mega-projects usa china japan india the republic of korea russia International relations JZ2-6530 A. N. Fedorovsky Crisis of Regional Leadership and Stagnation of Mega-projects in Asia-Pacific: Consequences for Russia |
| description |
Analyses of modern trade and economic relations in Asia-Pacific region. Research of the roles of the United States of America and China under the conditions of protectionism initiated by the D. Tramp’s administration and stagnation of mega-projects. Crisis of leadership and role of USA and China in regional mega-project (APEC, TPP, RCPEC). Ability of the USA and the PRC to create regional economic priorities, as well as to determine the course of integration processes. Analysis of the main obstacles of realization of American and Chinese leadership potential. Regional integration project initiated by Japan, India and the Republic of Korea and prospects for Indo-Pacific Asia. China-USA competition and main trends of regional integration. Comparative study of opportunitiesand prospects for bilateral and mega-regional economic projects. As an example, observation of South Korean initiative “New Economic Map” is presented and analyzed. Role of “New Economic Forum” initiated by Bloomberg with support of global big business is examined also. Initiative of Indo-Pacific region, Japan-India economic cooperation are examined, as well as Washington policy to counterweight China foreign economic and political expansion. Analyzing of prospects and consequences of competition between USA and the PRC in Pacific regions. Main issues, opportunities and challenges of Russia’s economic expansion in Asia-Pacific region. Close interconnection between policy, security and economiccooperation in the region: influence on Russia’s Pacific priorities and diplomacy. Characteristics of some problems of Russian “East Policy” during last several years. Some arguments are presented in favor of Russia’s strategy of “policy of focused partnerships”. This kind of policy means prevail of business activity in some special projects as well as in some geographic areas. It is also stressed that it is in Russia’s long-run interests to use of all kind of diplomatic measures in order to minimize any attempts to oppose India to China. But try its best to support cooperation between Russia, China and India in Pacific, as well as in Indo-Pacific region. |
| format |
article |
| author |
A. N. Fedorovsky |
| author_facet |
A. N. Fedorovsky |
| author_sort |
A. N. Fedorovsky |
| title |
Crisis of Regional Leadership and Stagnation of Mega-projects in Asia-Pacific: Consequences for Russia |
| title_short |
Crisis of Regional Leadership and Stagnation of Mega-projects in Asia-Pacific: Consequences for Russia |
| title_full |
Crisis of Regional Leadership and Stagnation of Mega-projects in Asia-Pacific: Consequences for Russia |
| title_fullStr |
Crisis of Regional Leadership and Stagnation of Mega-projects in Asia-Pacific: Consequences for Russia |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Crisis of Regional Leadership and Stagnation of Mega-projects in Asia-Pacific: Consequences for Russia |
| title_sort |
crisis of regional leadership and stagnation of mega-projects in asia-pacific: consequences for russia |
| publisher |
Ассоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”) |
| publishDate |
2019 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/c3681ba52a88491586d01133af48f175 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT anfedorovsky crisisofregionalleadershipandstagnationofmegaprojectsinasiapacificconsequencesforrussia |
| _version_ |
1718443380644511744 |