Manual kidney stone size measurements in computed tomography are most accurate using multiplanar image reformatations and bone window settings

Abstract Computed tomography in suspected urolithiasis provides information about the presence, location and size of stones. Particularly stone size is a key parameter in treatment decision; however, data on impact of reformatation and measurement strategies is sparse. This study aimed to investigat...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robert Peter Reimer, Konstantin Klein, Miriam Rinneburger, David Zopfs, Simon Lennartz, Johannes Salem, Axel Heidenreich, David Maintz, Stefan Haneder, Nils Große Hokamp
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/c3780efc8c1546768989e12f16f75c80
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:c3780efc8c1546768989e12f16f75c80
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:c3780efc8c1546768989e12f16f75c802021-12-02T19:06:44ZManual kidney stone size measurements in computed tomography are most accurate using multiplanar image reformatations and bone window settings10.1038/s41598-021-95962-z2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/c3780efc8c1546768989e12f16f75c802021-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95962-zhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Computed tomography in suspected urolithiasis provides information about the presence, location and size of stones. Particularly stone size is a key parameter in treatment decision; however, data on impact of reformatation and measurement strategies is sparse. This study aimed to investigate the influence of different image reformatations, slice thicknesses and window settings on stone size measurements. Reference stone sizes of 47 kidney stones representative for clinically encountered compositions were measured manually using a digital caliper (Man-M). Afterwards stones were placed in a 3D-printed, semi-anthropomorphic phantom, and scanned using a low dose protocol (CTDIvol 2 mGy). Images were reconstructed using hybrid-iterative and model-based iterative reconstruction algorithms (HIR, MBIR) with different slice thicknesses. Two independent readers measured largest stone diameter on axial (2 mm and 5 mm) and multiplanar reformatations (based upon 0.67 mm reconstructions) using different window settings (soft-tissue and bone). Statistics were conducted using ANOVA ± correction for multiple comparisons. Overall stone size in CT was underestimated compared to Man-M (8.8 ± 2.9 vs. 7.7 ± 2.7 mm, p < 0.05), yet closely correlated (r = 0.70). Reconstruction algorithm and slice thickness did not significantly impact measurements (p > 0.05), while image reformatations and window settings did (p < 0.05). CT measurements using multiplanar reformatation with a bone window setting showed closest agreement with Man-M (8.7 ± 3.1 vs. 8.8 ± 2.9 mm, p < 0.05, r = 0.83). Manual CT-based stone size measurements are most accurate using multiplanar image reformatation with a bone window setting, while measurements on axial planes with different slice thicknesses underestimate true stone size. Therefore, this procedure is recommended when impacting treatment decision.Robert Peter ReimerKonstantin KleinMiriam RinneburgerDavid ZopfsSimon LennartzJohannes SalemAxel HeidenreichDavid MaintzStefan HanederNils Große HokampNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Robert Peter Reimer
Konstantin Klein
Miriam Rinneburger
David Zopfs
Simon Lennartz
Johannes Salem
Axel Heidenreich
David Maintz
Stefan Haneder
Nils Große Hokamp
Manual kidney stone size measurements in computed tomography are most accurate using multiplanar image reformatations and bone window settings
description Abstract Computed tomography in suspected urolithiasis provides information about the presence, location and size of stones. Particularly stone size is a key parameter in treatment decision; however, data on impact of reformatation and measurement strategies is sparse. This study aimed to investigate the influence of different image reformatations, slice thicknesses and window settings on stone size measurements. Reference stone sizes of 47 kidney stones representative for clinically encountered compositions were measured manually using a digital caliper (Man-M). Afterwards stones were placed in a 3D-printed, semi-anthropomorphic phantom, and scanned using a low dose protocol (CTDIvol 2 mGy). Images were reconstructed using hybrid-iterative and model-based iterative reconstruction algorithms (HIR, MBIR) with different slice thicknesses. Two independent readers measured largest stone diameter on axial (2 mm and 5 mm) and multiplanar reformatations (based upon 0.67 mm reconstructions) using different window settings (soft-tissue and bone). Statistics were conducted using ANOVA ± correction for multiple comparisons. Overall stone size in CT was underestimated compared to Man-M (8.8 ± 2.9 vs. 7.7 ± 2.7 mm, p < 0.05), yet closely correlated (r = 0.70). Reconstruction algorithm and slice thickness did not significantly impact measurements (p > 0.05), while image reformatations and window settings did (p < 0.05). CT measurements using multiplanar reformatation with a bone window setting showed closest agreement with Man-M (8.7 ± 3.1 vs. 8.8 ± 2.9 mm, p < 0.05, r = 0.83). Manual CT-based stone size measurements are most accurate using multiplanar image reformatation with a bone window setting, while measurements on axial planes with different slice thicknesses underestimate true stone size. Therefore, this procedure is recommended when impacting treatment decision.
format article
author Robert Peter Reimer
Konstantin Klein
Miriam Rinneburger
David Zopfs
Simon Lennartz
Johannes Salem
Axel Heidenreich
David Maintz
Stefan Haneder
Nils Große Hokamp
author_facet Robert Peter Reimer
Konstantin Klein
Miriam Rinneburger
David Zopfs
Simon Lennartz
Johannes Salem
Axel Heidenreich
David Maintz
Stefan Haneder
Nils Große Hokamp
author_sort Robert Peter Reimer
title Manual kidney stone size measurements in computed tomography are most accurate using multiplanar image reformatations and bone window settings
title_short Manual kidney stone size measurements in computed tomography are most accurate using multiplanar image reformatations and bone window settings
title_full Manual kidney stone size measurements in computed tomography are most accurate using multiplanar image reformatations and bone window settings
title_fullStr Manual kidney stone size measurements in computed tomography are most accurate using multiplanar image reformatations and bone window settings
title_full_unstemmed Manual kidney stone size measurements in computed tomography are most accurate using multiplanar image reformatations and bone window settings
title_sort manual kidney stone size measurements in computed tomography are most accurate using multiplanar image reformatations and bone window settings
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/c3780efc8c1546768989e12f16f75c80
work_keys_str_mv AT robertpeterreimer manualkidneystonesizemeasurementsincomputedtomographyaremostaccurateusingmultiplanarimagereformatationsandbonewindowsettings
AT konstantinklein manualkidneystonesizemeasurementsincomputedtomographyaremostaccurateusingmultiplanarimagereformatationsandbonewindowsettings
AT miriamrinneburger manualkidneystonesizemeasurementsincomputedtomographyaremostaccurateusingmultiplanarimagereformatationsandbonewindowsettings
AT davidzopfs manualkidneystonesizemeasurementsincomputedtomographyaremostaccurateusingmultiplanarimagereformatationsandbonewindowsettings
AT simonlennartz manualkidneystonesizemeasurementsincomputedtomographyaremostaccurateusingmultiplanarimagereformatationsandbonewindowsettings
AT johannessalem manualkidneystonesizemeasurementsincomputedtomographyaremostaccurateusingmultiplanarimagereformatationsandbonewindowsettings
AT axelheidenreich manualkidneystonesizemeasurementsincomputedtomographyaremostaccurateusingmultiplanarimagereformatationsandbonewindowsettings
AT davidmaintz manualkidneystonesizemeasurementsincomputedtomographyaremostaccurateusingmultiplanarimagereformatationsandbonewindowsettings
AT stefanhaneder manualkidneystonesizemeasurementsincomputedtomographyaremostaccurateusingmultiplanarimagereformatationsandbonewindowsettings
AT nilsgroßehokamp manualkidneystonesizemeasurementsincomputedtomographyaremostaccurateusingmultiplanarimagereformatationsandbonewindowsettings
_version_ 1718377174495395840