Portable, open-source solutions for estimating wrist position during reaching in people with stroke

Abstract Arm movement kinematics may provide a more sensitive way to assess neurorehabilitation outcomes than existing metrics. However, measuring arm kinematics in people with stroke can be challenging for traditional optical tracking systems due to non-ideal environments, expense, and difficulty p...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jeffrey Z. Nie, James W. Nie, Na-Teng Hung, R. James Cotton, Marc W. Slutzky
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/c3e25c8b0f6345409157174ed243b587
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:c3e25c8b0f6345409157174ed243b587
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:c3e25c8b0f6345409157174ed243b5872021-11-21T12:20:43ZPortable, open-source solutions for estimating wrist position during reaching in people with stroke10.1038/s41598-021-01805-22045-2322https://doaj.org/article/c3e25c8b0f6345409157174ed243b5872021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01805-2https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Arm movement kinematics may provide a more sensitive way to assess neurorehabilitation outcomes than existing metrics. However, measuring arm kinematics in people with stroke can be challenging for traditional optical tracking systems due to non-ideal environments, expense, and difficulty performing required calibration. Here, we present two open-source methods, one using inertial measurement units (IMUs) and another using virtual reality (Vive) sensors, for accurate measurements of wrist position with respect to the shoulder during reaching movements in people with stroke. We assessed the accuracy of each method during a 3D reaching task. We also demonstrated each method’s ability to track two metrics derived from kinematics-sweep area and smoothness-in people with chronic stroke. We computed correlation coefficients between the kinematics estimated by each method when appropriate. Compared to a traditional optical tracking system, both methods accurately tracked the wrist during reaching, with mean signed errors of 0.09 ± 1.81 cm and 0.48 ± 1.58 cm for the IMUs and Vive, respectively. Furthermore, both methods’ estimated kinematics were highly correlated with each other (p < 0.01). By using relatively inexpensive wearable sensors, these methods may be useful for developing kinematic metrics to evaluate stroke rehabilitation outcomes in both laboratory and clinical environments.Jeffrey Z. NieJames W. NieNa-Teng HungR. James CottonMarc W. SlutzkyNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Jeffrey Z. Nie
James W. Nie
Na-Teng Hung
R. James Cotton
Marc W. Slutzky
Portable, open-source solutions for estimating wrist position during reaching in people with stroke
description Abstract Arm movement kinematics may provide a more sensitive way to assess neurorehabilitation outcomes than existing metrics. However, measuring arm kinematics in people with stroke can be challenging for traditional optical tracking systems due to non-ideal environments, expense, and difficulty performing required calibration. Here, we present two open-source methods, one using inertial measurement units (IMUs) and another using virtual reality (Vive) sensors, for accurate measurements of wrist position with respect to the shoulder during reaching movements in people with stroke. We assessed the accuracy of each method during a 3D reaching task. We also demonstrated each method’s ability to track two metrics derived from kinematics-sweep area and smoothness-in people with chronic stroke. We computed correlation coefficients between the kinematics estimated by each method when appropriate. Compared to a traditional optical tracking system, both methods accurately tracked the wrist during reaching, with mean signed errors of 0.09 ± 1.81 cm and 0.48 ± 1.58 cm for the IMUs and Vive, respectively. Furthermore, both methods’ estimated kinematics were highly correlated with each other (p < 0.01). By using relatively inexpensive wearable sensors, these methods may be useful for developing kinematic metrics to evaluate stroke rehabilitation outcomes in both laboratory and clinical environments.
format article
author Jeffrey Z. Nie
James W. Nie
Na-Teng Hung
R. James Cotton
Marc W. Slutzky
author_facet Jeffrey Z. Nie
James W. Nie
Na-Teng Hung
R. James Cotton
Marc W. Slutzky
author_sort Jeffrey Z. Nie
title Portable, open-source solutions for estimating wrist position during reaching in people with stroke
title_short Portable, open-source solutions for estimating wrist position during reaching in people with stroke
title_full Portable, open-source solutions for estimating wrist position during reaching in people with stroke
title_fullStr Portable, open-source solutions for estimating wrist position during reaching in people with stroke
title_full_unstemmed Portable, open-source solutions for estimating wrist position during reaching in people with stroke
title_sort portable, open-source solutions for estimating wrist position during reaching in people with stroke
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/c3e25c8b0f6345409157174ed243b587
work_keys_str_mv AT jeffreyznie portableopensourcesolutionsforestimatingwristpositionduringreachinginpeoplewithstroke
AT jameswnie portableopensourcesolutionsforestimatingwristpositionduringreachinginpeoplewithstroke
AT natenghung portableopensourcesolutionsforestimatingwristpositionduringreachinginpeoplewithstroke
AT rjamescotton portableopensourcesolutionsforestimatingwristpositionduringreachinginpeoplewithstroke
AT marcwslutzky portableopensourcesolutionsforestimatingwristpositionduringreachinginpeoplewithstroke
_version_ 1718419092462895104