Comparison of prognostic genomic predictors in colorectal cancer.

<h4>Background</h4>Although several prognostic genomic predictors have been identified from independent studies, it remains unclear whether these predictors are actually concordant with respect to their predictions for individual patients and which predictor performs best. We compared fi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yun-Yong Park, Sung Sook Lee, Jae Yun Lim, Sang Cheol Kim, Sang Bae Kim, Bo Hwa Sohn, In-Sun Chu, Sang Cheul Oh, Eun Sung Park, Woojin Jeong, Sung Soo Kim, Scott Kopetz, Ju-Seog Lee
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/c40504f2b47848449d4f2efcb243ecfc
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:c40504f2b47848449d4f2efcb243ecfc
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:c40504f2b47848449d4f2efcb243ecfc2021-11-18T07:48:29ZComparison of prognostic genomic predictors in colorectal cancer.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0060778https://doaj.org/article/c40504f2b47848449d4f2efcb243ecfc2013-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/23626670/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background</h4>Although several prognostic genomic predictors have been identified from independent studies, it remains unclear whether these predictors are actually concordant with respect to their predictions for individual patients and which predictor performs best. We compared five prognostic genomic predictors, the V7RHS, the ColoGuideEx, the Meta163, the OncoDX, and the MDA114, in terms of predicting disease-free survival in two independent cohorts of patients with colorectal cancer.<h4>Study design</h4>Using original classification algorithms, we tested the predictions of five genomic predictors for disease-free survival in two cohorts of patients with colorectal cancer (n = 229 and n = 168) and evaluated concordance of predictors in predicting outcomes for individual patients.<h4>Results</h4>We found that only two predictors, OncoDX and MDA114, demonstrated robust performance in identifying patients with poor prognosis in 2 independent cohorts. These two predictors also had modest but significant concordance of predicted outcome (r>0.3, P<0.001 in both cohorts).<h4>Conclusions</h4>Further validation of developed genomic predictors is necessary. Despite the limited number of genes shared by OncoDX and MDA114, individual-patient outcomes predicted by these two predictors were significantly concordant.Yun-Yong ParkSung Sook LeeJae Yun LimSang Cheol KimSang Bae KimBo Hwa SohnIn-Sun ChuSang Cheul OhEun Sung ParkWoojin JeongSung Soo KimScott KopetzJu-Seog LeePublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 8, Iss 4, p e60778 (2013)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Yun-Yong Park
Sung Sook Lee
Jae Yun Lim
Sang Cheol Kim
Sang Bae Kim
Bo Hwa Sohn
In-Sun Chu
Sang Cheul Oh
Eun Sung Park
Woojin Jeong
Sung Soo Kim
Scott Kopetz
Ju-Seog Lee
Comparison of prognostic genomic predictors in colorectal cancer.
description <h4>Background</h4>Although several prognostic genomic predictors have been identified from independent studies, it remains unclear whether these predictors are actually concordant with respect to their predictions for individual patients and which predictor performs best. We compared five prognostic genomic predictors, the V7RHS, the ColoGuideEx, the Meta163, the OncoDX, and the MDA114, in terms of predicting disease-free survival in two independent cohorts of patients with colorectal cancer.<h4>Study design</h4>Using original classification algorithms, we tested the predictions of five genomic predictors for disease-free survival in two cohorts of patients with colorectal cancer (n = 229 and n = 168) and evaluated concordance of predictors in predicting outcomes for individual patients.<h4>Results</h4>We found that only two predictors, OncoDX and MDA114, demonstrated robust performance in identifying patients with poor prognosis in 2 independent cohorts. These two predictors also had modest but significant concordance of predicted outcome (r>0.3, P<0.001 in both cohorts).<h4>Conclusions</h4>Further validation of developed genomic predictors is necessary. Despite the limited number of genes shared by OncoDX and MDA114, individual-patient outcomes predicted by these two predictors were significantly concordant.
format article
author Yun-Yong Park
Sung Sook Lee
Jae Yun Lim
Sang Cheol Kim
Sang Bae Kim
Bo Hwa Sohn
In-Sun Chu
Sang Cheul Oh
Eun Sung Park
Woojin Jeong
Sung Soo Kim
Scott Kopetz
Ju-Seog Lee
author_facet Yun-Yong Park
Sung Sook Lee
Jae Yun Lim
Sang Cheol Kim
Sang Bae Kim
Bo Hwa Sohn
In-Sun Chu
Sang Cheul Oh
Eun Sung Park
Woojin Jeong
Sung Soo Kim
Scott Kopetz
Ju-Seog Lee
author_sort Yun-Yong Park
title Comparison of prognostic genomic predictors in colorectal cancer.
title_short Comparison of prognostic genomic predictors in colorectal cancer.
title_full Comparison of prognostic genomic predictors in colorectal cancer.
title_fullStr Comparison of prognostic genomic predictors in colorectal cancer.
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of prognostic genomic predictors in colorectal cancer.
title_sort comparison of prognostic genomic predictors in colorectal cancer.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2013
url https://doaj.org/article/c40504f2b47848449d4f2efcb243ecfc
work_keys_str_mv AT yunyongpark comparisonofprognosticgenomicpredictorsincolorectalcancer
AT sungsooklee comparisonofprognosticgenomicpredictorsincolorectalcancer
AT jaeyunlim comparisonofprognosticgenomicpredictorsincolorectalcancer
AT sangcheolkim comparisonofprognosticgenomicpredictorsincolorectalcancer
AT sangbaekim comparisonofprognosticgenomicpredictorsincolorectalcancer
AT bohwasohn comparisonofprognosticgenomicpredictorsincolorectalcancer
AT insunchu comparisonofprognosticgenomicpredictorsincolorectalcancer
AT sangcheuloh comparisonofprognosticgenomicpredictorsincolorectalcancer
AT eunsungpark comparisonofprognosticgenomicpredictorsincolorectalcancer
AT woojinjeong comparisonofprognosticgenomicpredictorsincolorectalcancer
AT sungsookim comparisonofprognosticgenomicpredictorsincolorectalcancer
AT scottkopetz comparisonofprognosticgenomicpredictorsincolorectalcancer
AT juseoglee comparisonofprognosticgenomicpredictorsincolorectalcancer
_version_ 1718422935533780992