Bias correction demonstration in two of the Indian Himalayan river basins

There is imperative need of robust basin-scale data for climate impact studies over the topographically varying and landuse heterogenous river basins in the Indian Himalayan Region (IHR). Even finer resolution regional climate models’ (RCMs) information is elusive for these purposes. Based on availa...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: A. P. Dimri
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: IWA Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/c431f5b2e4df453099f5fb1b7aee3c55
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:c431f5b2e4df453099f5fb1b7aee3c55
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:c431f5b2e4df453099f5fb1b7aee3c552021-11-05T18:52:39ZBias correction demonstration in two of the Indian Himalayan river basins2040-22442408-935410.2166/wcc.2020.119https://doaj.org/article/c431f5b2e4df453099f5fb1b7aee3c552021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttp://jwcc.iwaponline.com/content/12/4/1297https://doaj.org/toc/2040-2244https://doaj.org/toc/2408-9354There is imperative need of robust basin-scale data for climate impact studies over the topographically varying and landuse heterogenous river basins in the Indian Himalayan Region (IHR). Even finer resolution regional climate models’ (RCMs) information is elusive for these purposes. Based on available model fields and corresponding in-situ observed fields, bias correction for precipitation over Upper Ganga River Basin (UGRB) and temperature over Satluj River Basin (SRB) is demonstrated. These chosen river basins are in central and western Himalayas, respectively. Model precipitation (temperature) field from RegCM4.7 (REMO) and corresponding observed precipitation (temperature) field from nine (eight) stations of UGRB (SRB) are considered. Empirical quantile mapping (inverse function method) method is used. It is seen that each model has a distinct systematic bias relating to both precipitation and temperature means with respect to their corresponding observed means. Applying bias correction methods to the model fields resulted in reducing these mean biases and other errors. These findings illustrate handling and improving the model fields for hydrology, glaciology studies, etc. HIGHLIGHTS Bias correction using empirical quantile mapping (inverse function method) is employed on both precipitation and temperature model.; Applying bias correction methods to the model fields resulted in reducing the mean biases and other errors.; These findings illustrate handling and improving the model fields for hydrologist, glaciologist, etc.;A. P. DimriIWA Publishingarticlebias correctionhimalayan river basinindian himalayan regionprecipitationtemperatureEnvironmental technology. Sanitary engineeringTD1-1066Environmental sciencesGE1-350ENJournal of Water and Climate Change, Vol 12, Iss 4, Pp 1297-1309 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic bias correction
himalayan river basin
indian himalayan region
precipitation
temperature
Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering
TD1-1066
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
spellingShingle bias correction
himalayan river basin
indian himalayan region
precipitation
temperature
Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering
TD1-1066
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
A. P. Dimri
Bias correction demonstration in two of the Indian Himalayan river basins
description There is imperative need of robust basin-scale data for climate impact studies over the topographically varying and landuse heterogenous river basins in the Indian Himalayan Region (IHR). Even finer resolution regional climate models’ (RCMs) information is elusive for these purposes. Based on available model fields and corresponding in-situ observed fields, bias correction for precipitation over Upper Ganga River Basin (UGRB) and temperature over Satluj River Basin (SRB) is demonstrated. These chosen river basins are in central and western Himalayas, respectively. Model precipitation (temperature) field from RegCM4.7 (REMO) and corresponding observed precipitation (temperature) field from nine (eight) stations of UGRB (SRB) are considered. Empirical quantile mapping (inverse function method) method is used. It is seen that each model has a distinct systematic bias relating to both precipitation and temperature means with respect to their corresponding observed means. Applying bias correction methods to the model fields resulted in reducing these mean biases and other errors. These findings illustrate handling and improving the model fields for hydrology, glaciology studies, etc. HIGHLIGHTS Bias correction using empirical quantile mapping (inverse function method) is employed on both precipitation and temperature model.; Applying bias correction methods to the model fields resulted in reducing the mean biases and other errors.; These findings illustrate handling and improving the model fields for hydrologist, glaciologist, etc.;
format article
author A. P. Dimri
author_facet A. P. Dimri
author_sort A. P. Dimri
title Bias correction demonstration in two of the Indian Himalayan river basins
title_short Bias correction demonstration in two of the Indian Himalayan river basins
title_full Bias correction demonstration in two of the Indian Himalayan river basins
title_fullStr Bias correction demonstration in two of the Indian Himalayan river basins
title_full_unstemmed Bias correction demonstration in two of the Indian Himalayan river basins
title_sort bias correction demonstration in two of the indian himalayan river basins
publisher IWA Publishing
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/c431f5b2e4df453099f5fb1b7aee3c55
work_keys_str_mv AT apdimri biascorrectiondemonstrationintwooftheindianhimalayanriverbasins
_version_ 1718444124388982784