Outcomes and complications of the reamer irrigator aspirator versus traditional iliac crest bone graft harvesting: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract Background The reamer irrigator aspirator (RIA) is a relatively recent device that is placed in the medullary canal of long bones to harvest a large volume of bone marrow, which is collected in a filtered canister. This study compares outcomes and complications of the RIA versus a tradition...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
SpringerOpen
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/c43f77f7c31d419d9d650cf03c882f8c |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:c43f77f7c31d419d9d650cf03c882f8c |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:c43f77f7c31d419d9d650cf03c882f8c2021-12-05T12:21:32ZOutcomes and complications of the reamer irrigator aspirator versus traditional iliac crest bone graft harvesting: a systematic review and meta-analysis10.1186/s10195-021-00612-91590-99211590-9999https://doaj.org/article/c43f77f7c31d419d9d650cf03c882f8c2021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-021-00612-9https://doaj.org/toc/1590-9921https://doaj.org/toc/1590-9999Abstract Background The reamer irrigator aspirator (RIA) is a relatively recent device that is placed in the medullary canal of long bones to harvest a large volume of bone marrow, which is collected in a filtered canister. This study compares outcomes and complications of the RIA versus a traditional iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) for the treatment of bone defects. Methods This meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The Embase, Google Scholar, PubMed, and Scopus databases were accessed in June 2021. All clinical trials comparing the RIA and ICBG with a minimum of 6 months follow-up were included. Results Data from 4819 patients were collected. The RIA group demonstrated lower site pain (P < 0.0001), fewer infections (P = 0.001), and a lower rate of adverse events (P < 0.0001). The ICBG group demonstrated a greater rate of bone union (P < 0.0001). There was no difference between groups in VAS (P = 0.09) and mean time to union (P = 0.06). Conclusion The current evidence supports the use of the RIA, given its low morbidity and short learning curve.Francesco OlivaFilippo MiglioriniFrancesco CuozzoErnesto TorsielloFrank HildebrandNicola MaffulliSpringerOpenarticleReamerIrrigatorAspiratorRIAIliacCrestOrthopedic surgeryRD701-811ENJournal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Vol 22, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Reamer Irrigator Aspirator RIA Iliac Crest Orthopedic surgery RD701-811 |
spellingShingle |
Reamer Irrigator Aspirator RIA Iliac Crest Orthopedic surgery RD701-811 Francesco Oliva Filippo Migliorini Francesco Cuozzo Ernesto Torsiello Frank Hildebrand Nicola Maffulli Outcomes and complications of the reamer irrigator aspirator versus traditional iliac crest bone graft harvesting: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
description |
Abstract Background The reamer irrigator aspirator (RIA) is a relatively recent device that is placed in the medullary canal of long bones to harvest a large volume of bone marrow, which is collected in a filtered canister. This study compares outcomes and complications of the RIA versus a traditional iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) for the treatment of bone defects. Methods This meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The Embase, Google Scholar, PubMed, and Scopus databases were accessed in June 2021. All clinical trials comparing the RIA and ICBG with a minimum of 6 months follow-up were included. Results Data from 4819 patients were collected. The RIA group demonstrated lower site pain (P < 0.0001), fewer infections (P = 0.001), and a lower rate of adverse events (P < 0.0001). The ICBG group demonstrated a greater rate of bone union (P < 0.0001). There was no difference between groups in VAS (P = 0.09) and mean time to union (P = 0.06). Conclusion The current evidence supports the use of the RIA, given its low morbidity and short learning curve. |
format |
article |
author |
Francesco Oliva Filippo Migliorini Francesco Cuozzo Ernesto Torsiello Frank Hildebrand Nicola Maffulli |
author_facet |
Francesco Oliva Filippo Migliorini Francesco Cuozzo Ernesto Torsiello Frank Hildebrand Nicola Maffulli |
author_sort |
Francesco Oliva |
title |
Outcomes and complications of the reamer irrigator aspirator versus traditional iliac crest bone graft harvesting: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short |
Outcomes and complications of the reamer irrigator aspirator versus traditional iliac crest bone graft harvesting: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full |
Outcomes and complications of the reamer irrigator aspirator versus traditional iliac crest bone graft harvesting: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
Outcomes and complications of the reamer irrigator aspirator versus traditional iliac crest bone graft harvesting: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Outcomes and complications of the reamer irrigator aspirator versus traditional iliac crest bone graft harvesting: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort |
outcomes and complications of the reamer irrigator aspirator versus traditional iliac crest bone graft harvesting: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
publisher |
SpringerOpen |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/c43f77f7c31d419d9d650cf03c882f8c |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT francescooliva outcomesandcomplicationsofthereamerirrigatoraspiratorversustraditionaliliaccrestbonegraftharvestingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT filippomigliorini outcomesandcomplicationsofthereamerirrigatoraspiratorversustraditionaliliaccrestbonegraftharvestingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT francescocuozzo outcomesandcomplicationsofthereamerirrigatoraspiratorversustraditionaliliaccrestbonegraftharvestingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ernestotorsiello outcomesandcomplicationsofthereamerirrigatoraspiratorversustraditionaliliaccrestbonegraftharvestingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT frankhildebrand outcomesandcomplicationsofthereamerirrigatoraspiratorversustraditionaliliaccrestbonegraftharvestingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT nicolamaffulli outcomesandcomplicationsofthereamerirrigatoraspiratorversustraditionaliliaccrestbonegraftharvestingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |
_version_ |
1718372040674639872 |