Outcomes and complications of the reamer irrigator aspirator versus traditional iliac crest bone graft harvesting: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background The reamer irrigator aspirator (RIA) is a relatively recent device that is placed in the medullary canal of long bones to harvest a large volume of bone marrow, which is collected in a filtered canister. This study compares outcomes and complications of the RIA versus a tradition...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Francesco Oliva, Filippo Migliorini, Francesco Cuozzo, Ernesto Torsiello, Frank Hildebrand, Nicola Maffulli
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: SpringerOpen 2021
Materias:
RIA
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/c43f77f7c31d419d9d650cf03c882f8c
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:c43f77f7c31d419d9d650cf03c882f8c
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:c43f77f7c31d419d9d650cf03c882f8c2021-12-05T12:21:32ZOutcomes and complications of the reamer irrigator aspirator versus traditional iliac crest bone graft harvesting: a systematic review and meta-analysis10.1186/s10195-021-00612-91590-99211590-9999https://doaj.org/article/c43f77f7c31d419d9d650cf03c882f8c2021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-021-00612-9https://doaj.org/toc/1590-9921https://doaj.org/toc/1590-9999Abstract Background The reamer irrigator aspirator (RIA) is a relatively recent device that is placed in the medullary canal of long bones to harvest a large volume of bone marrow, which is collected in a filtered canister. This study compares outcomes and complications of the RIA versus a traditional iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) for the treatment of bone defects. Methods This meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The Embase, Google Scholar, PubMed, and Scopus databases were accessed in June 2021. All clinical trials comparing the RIA and ICBG with a minimum of 6 months follow-up were included. Results Data from 4819 patients were collected. The RIA group demonstrated lower site pain (P < 0.0001), fewer infections (P = 0.001), and a lower rate of adverse events (P < 0.0001). The ICBG group demonstrated a greater rate of bone union (P < 0.0001). There was no difference between groups in VAS (P = 0.09) and mean time to union (P = 0.06). Conclusion The current evidence supports the use of the RIA, given its low morbidity and short learning curve.Francesco OlivaFilippo MiglioriniFrancesco CuozzoErnesto TorsielloFrank HildebrandNicola MaffulliSpringerOpenarticleReamerIrrigatorAspiratorRIAIliacCrestOrthopedic surgeryRD701-811ENJournal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Vol 22, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Reamer
Irrigator
Aspirator
RIA
Iliac
Crest
Orthopedic surgery
RD701-811
spellingShingle Reamer
Irrigator
Aspirator
RIA
Iliac
Crest
Orthopedic surgery
RD701-811
Francesco Oliva
Filippo Migliorini
Francesco Cuozzo
Ernesto Torsiello
Frank Hildebrand
Nicola Maffulli
Outcomes and complications of the reamer irrigator aspirator versus traditional iliac crest bone graft harvesting: a systematic review and meta-analysis
description Abstract Background The reamer irrigator aspirator (RIA) is a relatively recent device that is placed in the medullary canal of long bones to harvest a large volume of bone marrow, which is collected in a filtered canister. This study compares outcomes and complications of the RIA versus a traditional iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) for the treatment of bone defects. Methods This meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The Embase, Google Scholar, PubMed, and Scopus databases were accessed in June 2021. All clinical trials comparing the RIA and ICBG with a minimum of 6 months follow-up were included. Results Data from 4819 patients were collected. The RIA group demonstrated lower site pain (P < 0.0001), fewer infections (P = 0.001), and a lower rate of adverse events (P < 0.0001). The ICBG group demonstrated a greater rate of bone union (P < 0.0001). There was no difference between groups in VAS (P = 0.09) and mean time to union (P = 0.06). Conclusion The current evidence supports the use of the RIA, given its low morbidity and short learning curve.
format article
author Francesco Oliva
Filippo Migliorini
Francesco Cuozzo
Ernesto Torsiello
Frank Hildebrand
Nicola Maffulli
author_facet Francesco Oliva
Filippo Migliorini
Francesco Cuozzo
Ernesto Torsiello
Frank Hildebrand
Nicola Maffulli
author_sort Francesco Oliva
title Outcomes and complications of the reamer irrigator aspirator versus traditional iliac crest bone graft harvesting: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Outcomes and complications of the reamer irrigator aspirator versus traditional iliac crest bone graft harvesting: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Outcomes and complications of the reamer irrigator aspirator versus traditional iliac crest bone graft harvesting: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Outcomes and complications of the reamer irrigator aspirator versus traditional iliac crest bone graft harvesting: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes and complications of the reamer irrigator aspirator versus traditional iliac crest bone graft harvesting: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort outcomes and complications of the reamer irrigator aspirator versus traditional iliac crest bone graft harvesting: a systematic review and meta-analysis
publisher SpringerOpen
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/c43f77f7c31d419d9d650cf03c882f8c
work_keys_str_mv AT francescooliva outcomesandcomplicationsofthereamerirrigatoraspiratorversustraditionaliliaccrestbonegraftharvestingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT filippomigliorini outcomesandcomplicationsofthereamerirrigatoraspiratorversustraditionaliliaccrestbonegraftharvestingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT francescocuozzo outcomesandcomplicationsofthereamerirrigatoraspiratorversustraditionaliliaccrestbonegraftharvestingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ernestotorsiello outcomesandcomplicationsofthereamerirrigatoraspiratorversustraditionaliliaccrestbonegraftharvestingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT frankhildebrand outcomesandcomplicationsofthereamerirrigatoraspiratorversustraditionaliliaccrestbonegraftharvestingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT nicolamaffulli outcomesandcomplicationsofthereamerirrigatoraspiratorversustraditionaliliaccrestbonegraftharvestingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1718372040674639872