Enabling women to access preferred methods of contraception: a rapid review and behavioural analysis

Abstract Background Many pregnancies in the UK are either unplanned or ambivalent. This review aimed to (i) explore barriers and facilitators to women choosing and accessing a preferred method of contraception in the United Kingdom, and (ii) identify opportunities for behavioural interventions based...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abimbola A. Ayorinde, Felicity Boardman, Majel McGranahan, Lucy Porter, Nwamaka A. Eze, Anna Sallis, Rosanna Buck, Alison Hadley, Melissa Ludeke, Sue Mann, Oyinlola Oyebode
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: BMC 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/c4661c7d948d4e7fbf51d91e84687c25
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:c4661c7d948d4e7fbf51d91e84687c25
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:c4661c7d948d4e7fbf51d91e84687c252021-11-28T12:12:48ZEnabling women to access preferred methods of contraception: a rapid review and behavioural analysis10.1186/s12889-021-12212-71471-2458https://doaj.org/article/c4661c7d948d4e7fbf51d91e84687c252021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12212-7https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2458Abstract Background Many pregnancies in the UK are either unplanned or ambivalent. This review aimed to (i) explore barriers and facilitators to women choosing and accessing a preferred method of contraception in the United Kingdom, and (ii) identify opportunities for behavioural interventions based on examination of interventions that are currently available nationally. Methods Three databases were searched, and experts contacted to identify grey literature for studies presenting barriers and facilitators to women choosing and accessing a preferred method of contraception, conducted in the UK and published between 2009 and October 2019. Information on barriers and facilitators were coded into overarching themes, which were then coded into Mechanisms of Actions (MoAs) as listed in the Theory and Techniques Tool. National interventions were identified by consulting stakeholders and coded into the Behaviour Change Wheel. The match between barriers/facilitators and intervention content was assessed using the Behaviour Change Wheel. Results We included 32 studies and identified 46 barrier and facilitator themes. The most cited MoA was Environmental Context and Resources, which primarily related to the services women had access to and care they received. Social Influences, Beliefs about Consequences (e.g., side effects) and Knowledge were also key. The behavioural analysis highlighted four priority intervention functions (Modelling, Enablement, Education and Environmental Restructuring) that can be targeted to support women to choose and access their preferred method of contraception. Relevant policy categories and behaviour change techniques are also highlighted. Conclusions This review highlights factors that influence women’s choices and access to contraception and recommends opportunities that may be targeted for future interventions in order to support women to access preferred contraception. Registration Protocol was registered with PROSPERO (an international database of prospectively registered systematic reviews in health and social care) in December 2019, CRD42019161156 .Abimbola A. AyorindeFelicity BoardmanMajel McGranahanLucy PorterNwamaka A. EzeAnna SallisRosanna BuckAlison HadleyMelissa LudekeSue MannOyinlola OyebodeBMCarticleContraceptionWomenAccessBarriersFacilitatorsInterventionPublic aspects of medicineRA1-1270ENBMC Public Health, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Contraception
Women
Access
Barriers
Facilitators
Intervention
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
spellingShingle Contraception
Women
Access
Barriers
Facilitators
Intervention
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
Abimbola A. Ayorinde
Felicity Boardman
Majel McGranahan
Lucy Porter
Nwamaka A. Eze
Anna Sallis
Rosanna Buck
Alison Hadley
Melissa Ludeke
Sue Mann
Oyinlola Oyebode
Enabling women to access preferred methods of contraception: a rapid review and behavioural analysis
description Abstract Background Many pregnancies in the UK are either unplanned or ambivalent. This review aimed to (i) explore barriers and facilitators to women choosing and accessing a preferred method of contraception in the United Kingdom, and (ii) identify opportunities for behavioural interventions based on examination of interventions that are currently available nationally. Methods Three databases were searched, and experts contacted to identify grey literature for studies presenting barriers and facilitators to women choosing and accessing a preferred method of contraception, conducted in the UK and published between 2009 and October 2019. Information on barriers and facilitators were coded into overarching themes, which were then coded into Mechanisms of Actions (MoAs) as listed in the Theory and Techniques Tool. National interventions were identified by consulting stakeholders and coded into the Behaviour Change Wheel. The match between barriers/facilitators and intervention content was assessed using the Behaviour Change Wheel. Results We included 32 studies and identified 46 barrier and facilitator themes. The most cited MoA was Environmental Context and Resources, which primarily related to the services women had access to and care they received. Social Influences, Beliefs about Consequences (e.g., side effects) and Knowledge were also key. The behavioural analysis highlighted four priority intervention functions (Modelling, Enablement, Education and Environmental Restructuring) that can be targeted to support women to choose and access their preferred method of contraception. Relevant policy categories and behaviour change techniques are also highlighted. Conclusions This review highlights factors that influence women’s choices and access to contraception and recommends opportunities that may be targeted for future interventions in order to support women to access preferred contraception. Registration Protocol was registered with PROSPERO (an international database of prospectively registered systematic reviews in health and social care) in December 2019, CRD42019161156 .
format article
author Abimbola A. Ayorinde
Felicity Boardman
Majel McGranahan
Lucy Porter
Nwamaka A. Eze
Anna Sallis
Rosanna Buck
Alison Hadley
Melissa Ludeke
Sue Mann
Oyinlola Oyebode
author_facet Abimbola A. Ayorinde
Felicity Boardman
Majel McGranahan
Lucy Porter
Nwamaka A. Eze
Anna Sallis
Rosanna Buck
Alison Hadley
Melissa Ludeke
Sue Mann
Oyinlola Oyebode
author_sort Abimbola A. Ayorinde
title Enabling women to access preferred methods of contraception: a rapid review and behavioural analysis
title_short Enabling women to access preferred methods of contraception: a rapid review and behavioural analysis
title_full Enabling women to access preferred methods of contraception: a rapid review and behavioural analysis
title_fullStr Enabling women to access preferred methods of contraception: a rapid review and behavioural analysis
title_full_unstemmed Enabling women to access preferred methods of contraception: a rapid review and behavioural analysis
title_sort enabling women to access preferred methods of contraception: a rapid review and behavioural analysis
publisher BMC
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/c4661c7d948d4e7fbf51d91e84687c25
work_keys_str_mv AT abimbolaaayorinde enablingwomentoaccesspreferredmethodsofcontraceptionarapidreviewandbehaviouralanalysis
AT felicityboardman enablingwomentoaccesspreferredmethodsofcontraceptionarapidreviewandbehaviouralanalysis
AT majelmcgranahan enablingwomentoaccesspreferredmethodsofcontraceptionarapidreviewandbehaviouralanalysis
AT lucyporter enablingwomentoaccesspreferredmethodsofcontraceptionarapidreviewandbehaviouralanalysis
AT nwamakaaeze enablingwomentoaccesspreferredmethodsofcontraceptionarapidreviewandbehaviouralanalysis
AT annasallis enablingwomentoaccesspreferredmethodsofcontraceptionarapidreviewandbehaviouralanalysis
AT rosannabuck enablingwomentoaccesspreferredmethodsofcontraceptionarapidreviewandbehaviouralanalysis
AT alisonhadley enablingwomentoaccesspreferredmethodsofcontraceptionarapidreviewandbehaviouralanalysis
AT melissaludeke enablingwomentoaccesspreferredmethodsofcontraceptionarapidreviewandbehaviouralanalysis
AT suemann enablingwomentoaccesspreferredmethodsofcontraceptionarapidreviewandbehaviouralanalysis
AT oyinlolaoyebode enablingwomentoaccesspreferredmethodsofcontraceptionarapidreviewandbehaviouralanalysis
_version_ 1718408166084968448