Priorytety w strategii zachowania tożsamości przez mniejszość serbo łużycką

The Priorities in the Strategy of Behavior by a Minority of Sorbian Identity The article discusses the priorities and strategies implemented by the Sorbian minority after the reunification of Germany to safeguard its national interests. The political changes‑unification of both German states acce...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Małgorzata Mieczkowska
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN PL
Publicado:	Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing 2015
Materias:	Łużyce Niemcy polityka etniczna Serbołużyczanie Law K Political science J
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/c4786500eeae40d7919d3003519bcadd
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:c4786500eeae40d7919d3003519bcadd
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:c4786500eeae40d7919d3003519bcadd2021-11-27T13:14:54ZPriorytety w strategii zachowania tożsamości przez mniejszość serbo łużycką10.12797/Politeja.11.2014.31_1.151733-67162391-6737https://doaj.org/article/c4786500eeae40d7919d3003519bcadd2015-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.akademicka.pl/politeja/article/view/2495https://doaj.org/toc/1733-6716https://doaj.org/toc/2391-6737 The Priorities in the Strategy of Behavior by a Minority of Sorbian Identity The article discusses the priorities and strategies implemented by the Sorbian minority after the reunification of Germany to safeguard its national interests. The political changes‑unification of both German states accelerated and forced conversion of the structure and organization within the minority. Sorbian minority gained the ability to build pluralistic organizational structures based on democratic legal solutions. In the public debate, set objectives and targets to achieve. Postulated among others: ensuring national rights, the protection of the territory of Lausitz, the creation of a new federal state “Lausitz”, an objective assessment of national policy pursued by the SED to the Sorbs. Domowina – the main organization of the Sorbs, held responsible for the processes of assimilation made has been restructured. Currently, it performs the role of a representative of the interests of national minorities, but does not participate in political participation and has no effect on the allocation of financial grant by the provinces on business organizations and institutions of minorities. Not all identified as strategic priorities in 1990 so far implemented‑the process is still open. Małgorzata MieczkowskaKsiegarnia Akademicka PublishingarticleŁużyceNiemcypolityka etnicznaSerbołużyczanieLawKPolitical scienceJENPLPoliteja, Vol 11, Iss 5 (31/1) (2015)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN PL
topic	Łużyce Niemcy polityka etniczna Serbołużyczanie Law K Political science J
spellingShingle	Łużyce Niemcy polityka etniczna Serbołużyczanie Law K Political science J Małgorzata Mieczkowska Priorytety w strategii zachowania tożsamości przez mniejszość serbo łużycką
description	The Priorities in the Strategy of Behavior by a Minority of Sorbian Identity The article discusses the priorities and strategies implemented by the Sorbian minority after the reunification of Germany to safeguard its national interests. The political changes‑unification of both German states accelerated and forced conversion of the structure and organization within the minority. Sorbian minority gained the ability to build pluralistic organizational structures based on democratic legal solutions. In the public debate, set objectives and targets to achieve. Postulated among others: ensuring national rights, the protection of the territory of Lausitz, the creation of a new federal state “Lausitz”, an objective assessment of national policy pursued by the SED to the Sorbs. Domowina – the main organization of the Sorbs, held responsible for the processes of assimilation made has been restructured. Currently, it performs the role of a representative of the interests of national minorities, but does not participate in political participation and has no effect on the allocation of financial grant by the provinces on business organizations and institutions of minorities. Not all identified as strategic priorities in 1990 so far implemented‑the process is still open.
format	article
author	Małgorzata Mieczkowska
author_facet	Małgorzata Mieczkowska
author_sort	Małgorzata Mieczkowska
title	Priorytety w strategii zachowania tożsamości przez mniejszość serbo łużycką
title_short	Priorytety w strategii zachowania tożsamości przez mniejszość serbo łużycką
title_full	Priorytety w strategii zachowania tożsamości przez mniejszość serbo łużycką
title_fullStr	Priorytety w strategii zachowania tożsamości przez mniejszość serbo łużycką
title_full_unstemmed	Priorytety w strategii zachowania tożsamości przez mniejszość serbo łużycką
title_sort	priorytety w strategii zachowania tożsamości przez mniejszość serbo łużycką
publisher	Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing
publishDate	2015
url	https://doaj.org/article/c4786500eeae40d7919d3003519bcadd
work_keys_str_mv	AT małgorzatamieczkowska priorytetywstrategiizachowaniatozsamosciprzezmniejszoscserbołuzycka
_version_	1718408587710038016

Priorytety w strategii zachowania tożsamości przez mniejszość serbo łużycką

Ejemplares similares