A Layer-Dependent Analytical Model for Printability Assessment of Additive Manufacturing Copper/Steel Multi-Material Components by Directed Energy Deposition

Copper/steel bimetal, one of the most popular and typical multi-material components (MMC), processes excellent comprehensive properties with the high strength of steel and the high thermal conductivity of copper alloy. Additive manufacturing (AM) technology is characterized by layer-wise fabrication...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wenqi Zhang, Baopeng Zhang, Haifeng Xiao, Huanqing Yang, Yun Wang, Haihong Zhu
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/c49f48e1e0344a87bdb0a86297d30f9a
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:c49f48e1e0344a87bdb0a86297d30f9a
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:c49f48e1e0344a87bdb0a86297d30f9a2021-11-25T18:23:38ZA Layer-Dependent Analytical Model for Printability Assessment of Additive Manufacturing Copper/Steel Multi-Material Components by Directed Energy Deposition10.3390/mi121113942072-666Xhttps://doaj.org/article/c49f48e1e0344a87bdb0a86297d30f9a2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2072-666X/12/11/1394https://doaj.org/toc/2072-666XCopper/steel bimetal, one of the most popular and typical multi-material components (MMC), processes excellent comprehensive properties with the high strength of steel and the high thermal conductivity of copper alloy. Additive manufacturing (AM) technology is characterized by layer-wise fabrication, and thus is especially suitable for fabricating MMC. However, considering both the great difference in thermophysical properties between copper and steel and the layer-based fabrication character of the AM process, the optimal processing parameters will vary throughout the deposition process. In this paper, we propose an analytical calculation model to predict the layer-dependent processing parameters when fabricating the 07Cr15Ni5 steel on the CuCr substrate at the fixed layer thickness (0.3 mm) and hatching space (0.3 mm). Specifically, the changes in effective thermal conductivity and specific heat capacity with the layer number, as well as the absorption rate and catchment efficiency with the processing parameters are considered. The parameter maps predicted by the model have good agreement with the experimental results. The proposed analytical model provides new guidance to determine the processing windows for novel multi-material components, especially for the multi-materials whose physical properties are significantly different.Wenqi ZhangBaopeng ZhangHaifeng XiaoHuanqing YangYun WangHaihong ZhuMDPI AGarticledirected energy depositionadditive manufacturingbimetalanalytical modelprintability mapsMechanical engineering and machineryTJ1-1570ENMicromachines, Vol 12, Iss 1394, p 1394 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic directed energy deposition
additive manufacturing
bimetal
analytical model
printability maps
Mechanical engineering and machinery
TJ1-1570
spellingShingle directed energy deposition
additive manufacturing
bimetal
analytical model
printability maps
Mechanical engineering and machinery
TJ1-1570
Wenqi Zhang
Baopeng Zhang
Haifeng Xiao
Huanqing Yang
Yun Wang
Haihong Zhu
A Layer-Dependent Analytical Model for Printability Assessment of Additive Manufacturing Copper/Steel Multi-Material Components by Directed Energy Deposition
description Copper/steel bimetal, one of the most popular and typical multi-material components (MMC), processes excellent comprehensive properties with the high strength of steel and the high thermal conductivity of copper alloy. Additive manufacturing (AM) technology is characterized by layer-wise fabrication, and thus is especially suitable for fabricating MMC. However, considering both the great difference in thermophysical properties between copper and steel and the layer-based fabrication character of the AM process, the optimal processing parameters will vary throughout the deposition process. In this paper, we propose an analytical calculation model to predict the layer-dependent processing parameters when fabricating the 07Cr15Ni5 steel on the CuCr substrate at the fixed layer thickness (0.3 mm) and hatching space (0.3 mm). Specifically, the changes in effective thermal conductivity and specific heat capacity with the layer number, as well as the absorption rate and catchment efficiency with the processing parameters are considered. The parameter maps predicted by the model have good agreement with the experimental results. The proposed analytical model provides new guidance to determine the processing windows for novel multi-material components, especially for the multi-materials whose physical properties are significantly different.
format article
author Wenqi Zhang
Baopeng Zhang
Haifeng Xiao
Huanqing Yang
Yun Wang
Haihong Zhu
author_facet Wenqi Zhang
Baopeng Zhang
Haifeng Xiao
Huanqing Yang
Yun Wang
Haihong Zhu
author_sort Wenqi Zhang
title A Layer-Dependent Analytical Model for Printability Assessment of Additive Manufacturing Copper/Steel Multi-Material Components by Directed Energy Deposition
title_short A Layer-Dependent Analytical Model for Printability Assessment of Additive Manufacturing Copper/Steel Multi-Material Components by Directed Energy Deposition
title_full A Layer-Dependent Analytical Model for Printability Assessment of Additive Manufacturing Copper/Steel Multi-Material Components by Directed Energy Deposition
title_fullStr A Layer-Dependent Analytical Model for Printability Assessment of Additive Manufacturing Copper/Steel Multi-Material Components by Directed Energy Deposition
title_full_unstemmed A Layer-Dependent Analytical Model for Printability Assessment of Additive Manufacturing Copper/Steel Multi-Material Components by Directed Energy Deposition
title_sort layer-dependent analytical model for printability assessment of additive manufacturing copper/steel multi-material components by directed energy deposition
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/c49f48e1e0344a87bdb0a86297d30f9a
work_keys_str_mv AT wenqizhang alayerdependentanalyticalmodelforprintabilityassessmentofadditivemanufacturingcoppersteelmultimaterialcomponentsbydirectedenergydeposition
AT baopengzhang alayerdependentanalyticalmodelforprintabilityassessmentofadditivemanufacturingcoppersteelmultimaterialcomponentsbydirectedenergydeposition
AT haifengxiao alayerdependentanalyticalmodelforprintabilityassessmentofadditivemanufacturingcoppersteelmultimaterialcomponentsbydirectedenergydeposition
AT huanqingyang alayerdependentanalyticalmodelforprintabilityassessmentofadditivemanufacturingcoppersteelmultimaterialcomponentsbydirectedenergydeposition
AT yunwang alayerdependentanalyticalmodelforprintabilityassessmentofadditivemanufacturingcoppersteelmultimaterialcomponentsbydirectedenergydeposition
AT haihongzhu alayerdependentanalyticalmodelforprintabilityassessmentofadditivemanufacturingcoppersteelmultimaterialcomponentsbydirectedenergydeposition
AT wenqizhang layerdependentanalyticalmodelforprintabilityassessmentofadditivemanufacturingcoppersteelmultimaterialcomponentsbydirectedenergydeposition
AT baopengzhang layerdependentanalyticalmodelforprintabilityassessmentofadditivemanufacturingcoppersteelmultimaterialcomponentsbydirectedenergydeposition
AT haifengxiao layerdependentanalyticalmodelforprintabilityassessmentofadditivemanufacturingcoppersteelmultimaterialcomponentsbydirectedenergydeposition
AT huanqingyang layerdependentanalyticalmodelforprintabilityassessmentofadditivemanufacturingcoppersteelmultimaterialcomponentsbydirectedenergydeposition
AT yunwang layerdependentanalyticalmodelforprintabilityassessmentofadditivemanufacturingcoppersteelmultimaterialcomponentsbydirectedenergydeposition
AT haihongzhu layerdependentanalyticalmodelforprintabilityassessmentofadditivemanufacturingcoppersteelmultimaterialcomponentsbydirectedenergydeposition
_version_ 1718411222600122368