Methods for specifying the target difference in a randomised controlled trial: the Difference ELicitation in TriAls (DELTA) systematic review.
<h4>Background</h4>Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are widely accepted as the preferred study design for evaluating healthcare interventions. When the sample size is determined, a (target) difference is typically specified that the RCT is designed to detect. This provides reassurance...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/c4ac93096a034f08bf1f2eceeb4c3ae7 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:doaj.org-article:c4ac93096a034f08bf1f2eceeb4c3ae7 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:c4ac93096a034f08bf1f2eceeb4c3ae72021-11-18T05:42:53ZMethods for specifying the target difference in a randomised controlled trial: the Difference ELicitation in TriAls (DELTA) systematic review.1549-12771549-167610.1371/journal.pmed.1001645https://doaj.org/article/c4ac93096a034f08bf1f2eceeb4c3ae72014-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24824338/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1549-1277https://doaj.org/toc/1549-1676<h4>Background</h4>Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are widely accepted as the preferred study design for evaluating healthcare interventions. When the sample size is determined, a (target) difference is typically specified that the RCT is designed to detect. This provides reassurance that the study will be informative, i.e., should such a difference exist, it is likely to be detected with the required statistical precision. The aim of this review was to identify potential methods for specifying the target difference in an RCT sample size calculation.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>A comprehensive systematic review of medical and non-medical literature was carried out for methods that could be used to specify the target difference for an RCT sample size calculation. The databases searched were MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Cochrane Methodology Register, PsycINFO, Science Citation Index, EconLit, the Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), and Scopus (for in-press publications); the search period was from 1966 or the earliest date covered, to between November 2010 and January 2011. Additionally, textbooks addressing the methodology of clinical trials and International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) tripartite guidelines for clinical trials were also consulted. A narrative synthesis of methods was produced. Studies that described a method that could be used for specifying an important and/or realistic difference were included. The search identified 11,485 potentially relevant articles from the databases searched. Of these, 1,434 were selected for full-text assessment, and a further nine were identified from other sources. Fifteen clinical trial textbooks and the ICH tripartite guidelines were also reviewed. In total, 777 studies were included, and within them, seven methods were identified-anchor, distribution, health economic, opinion-seeking, pilot study, review of the evidence base, and standardised effect size.<h4>Conclusions</h4>A variety of methods are available that researchers can use for specifying the target difference in an RCT sample size calculation. Appropriate methods may vary depending on the aim (e.g., specifying an important difference versus a realistic difference), context (e.g., research question and availability of data), and underlying framework adopted (e.g., Bayesian versus conventional statistical approach). Guidance on the use of each method is given. No single method provides a perfect solution for all contexts.Jenni HislopTemitope E AdewuyiLuke D ValeKirsten HarrildCynthia FraserTara GurungDouglas G AltmanAndrew H BriggsPeter FayersCraig R RamsayJohn D NorrieIan M HarveyBrian BuckleyJonathan A CookDELTA groupPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRENPLoS Medicine, Vol 11, Iss 5, p e1001645 (2014) |
| institution |
DOAJ |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
EN |
| topic |
Medicine R |
| spellingShingle |
Medicine R Jenni Hislop Temitope E Adewuyi Luke D Vale Kirsten Harrild Cynthia Fraser Tara Gurung Douglas G Altman Andrew H Briggs Peter Fayers Craig R Ramsay John D Norrie Ian M Harvey Brian Buckley Jonathan A Cook DELTA group Methods for specifying the target difference in a randomised controlled trial: the Difference ELicitation in TriAls (DELTA) systematic review. |
| description |
<h4>Background</h4>Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are widely accepted as the preferred study design for evaluating healthcare interventions. When the sample size is determined, a (target) difference is typically specified that the RCT is designed to detect. This provides reassurance that the study will be informative, i.e., should such a difference exist, it is likely to be detected with the required statistical precision. The aim of this review was to identify potential methods for specifying the target difference in an RCT sample size calculation.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>A comprehensive systematic review of medical and non-medical literature was carried out for methods that could be used to specify the target difference for an RCT sample size calculation. The databases searched were MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Cochrane Methodology Register, PsycINFO, Science Citation Index, EconLit, the Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), and Scopus (for in-press publications); the search period was from 1966 or the earliest date covered, to between November 2010 and January 2011. Additionally, textbooks addressing the methodology of clinical trials and International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) tripartite guidelines for clinical trials were also consulted. A narrative synthesis of methods was produced. Studies that described a method that could be used for specifying an important and/or realistic difference were included. The search identified 11,485 potentially relevant articles from the databases searched. Of these, 1,434 were selected for full-text assessment, and a further nine were identified from other sources. Fifteen clinical trial textbooks and the ICH tripartite guidelines were also reviewed. In total, 777 studies were included, and within them, seven methods were identified-anchor, distribution, health economic, opinion-seeking, pilot study, review of the evidence base, and standardised effect size.<h4>Conclusions</h4>A variety of methods are available that researchers can use for specifying the target difference in an RCT sample size calculation. Appropriate methods may vary depending on the aim (e.g., specifying an important difference versus a realistic difference), context (e.g., research question and availability of data), and underlying framework adopted (e.g., Bayesian versus conventional statistical approach). Guidance on the use of each method is given. No single method provides a perfect solution for all contexts. |
| format |
article |
| author |
Jenni Hislop Temitope E Adewuyi Luke D Vale Kirsten Harrild Cynthia Fraser Tara Gurung Douglas G Altman Andrew H Briggs Peter Fayers Craig R Ramsay John D Norrie Ian M Harvey Brian Buckley Jonathan A Cook DELTA group |
| author_facet |
Jenni Hislop Temitope E Adewuyi Luke D Vale Kirsten Harrild Cynthia Fraser Tara Gurung Douglas G Altman Andrew H Briggs Peter Fayers Craig R Ramsay John D Norrie Ian M Harvey Brian Buckley Jonathan A Cook DELTA group |
| author_sort |
Jenni Hislop |
| title |
Methods for specifying the target difference in a randomised controlled trial: the Difference ELicitation in TriAls (DELTA) systematic review. |
| title_short |
Methods for specifying the target difference in a randomised controlled trial: the Difference ELicitation in TriAls (DELTA) systematic review. |
| title_full |
Methods for specifying the target difference in a randomised controlled trial: the Difference ELicitation in TriAls (DELTA) systematic review. |
| title_fullStr |
Methods for specifying the target difference in a randomised controlled trial: the Difference ELicitation in TriAls (DELTA) systematic review. |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Methods for specifying the target difference in a randomised controlled trial: the Difference ELicitation in TriAls (DELTA) systematic review. |
| title_sort |
methods for specifying the target difference in a randomised controlled trial: the difference elicitation in trials (delta) systematic review. |
| publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| publishDate |
2014 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/c4ac93096a034f08bf1f2eceeb4c3ae7 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT jennihislop methodsforspecifyingthetargetdifferenceinarandomisedcontrolledtrialthedifferenceelicitationintrialsdeltasystematicreview AT temitopeeadewuyi methodsforspecifyingthetargetdifferenceinarandomisedcontrolledtrialthedifferenceelicitationintrialsdeltasystematicreview AT lukedvale methodsforspecifyingthetargetdifferenceinarandomisedcontrolledtrialthedifferenceelicitationintrialsdeltasystematicreview AT kirstenharrild methodsforspecifyingthetargetdifferenceinarandomisedcontrolledtrialthedifferenceelicitationintrialsdeltasystematicreview AT cynthiafraser methodsforspecifyingthetargetdifferenceinarandomisedcontrolledtrialthedifferenceelicitationintrialsdeltasystematicreview AT taragurung methodsforspecifyingthetargetdifferenceinarandomisedcontrolledtrialthedifferenceelicitationintrialsdeltasystematicreview AT douglasgaltman methodsforspecifyingthetargetdifferenceinarandomisedcontrolledtrialthedifferenceelicitationintrialsdeltasystematicreview AT andrewhbriggs methodsforspecifyingthetargetdifferenceinarandomisedcontrolledtrialthedifferenceelicitationintrialsdeltasystematicreview AT peterfayers methodsforspecifyingthetargetdifferenceinarandomisedcontrolledtrialthedifferenceelicitationintrialsdeltasystematicreview AT craigrramsay methodsforspecifyingthetargetdifferenceinarandomisedcontrolledtrialthedifferenceelicitationintrialsdeltasystematicreview AT johndnorrie methodsforspecifyingthetargetdifferenceinarandomisedcontrolledtrialthedifferenceelicitationintrialsdeltasystematicreview AT ianmharvey methodsforspecifyingthetargetdifferenceinarandomisedcontrolledtrialthedifferenceelicitationintrialsdeltasystematicreview AT brianbuckley methodsforspecifyingthetargetdifferenceinarandomisedcontrolledtrialthedifferenceelicitationintrialsdeltasystematicreview AT jonathanacook methodsforspecifyingthetargetdifferenceinarandomisedcontrolledtrialthedifferenceelicitationintrialsdeltasystematicreview AT deltagroup methodsforspecifyingthetargetdifferenceinarandomisedcontrolledtrialthedifferenceelicitationintrialsdeltasystematicreview |
| _version_ |
1718424813256572928 |