Comparison of visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) score in evaluation of post septoplasty patients

Objective: To compare and correlate the efficacy of the NOSE score & the VAS score in determining the symptomatic benefit in patients undergoing septoplasty. Materials and methods: Eighty patients with deviated nasal septum undergoing septoplasty were included in the study. NOSE score &a...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Radhika Hiren Shukla, Sanjana Vijay Nemade, Kiran Jaywant Shinde
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/c4be90ee79344132bc2bea741bd62b21
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:c4be90ee79344132bc2bea741bd62b21
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:c4be90ee79344132bc2bea741bd62b212021-12-02T16:44:15ZComparison of visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) score in evaluation of post septoplasty patients2095-881110.1016/j.wjorl.2019.06.002https://doaj.org/article/c4be90ee79344132bc2bea741bd62b212020-03-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095881119300988https://doaj.org/toc/2095-8811Objective: To compare and correlate the efficacy of the NOSE score & the VAS score in determining the symptomatic benefit in patients undergoing septoplasty. Materials and methods: Eighty patients with deviated nasal septum undergoing septoplasty were included in the study. NOSE score & VAS score (out of 100) was documented before and after surgery. Results were correlated and compared statistically. Results: In the NOSE score, the most bothersome symptom was trouble breathing through the nose (85.83); followed by Nasal obstruction or blockage (82.50). Wilcoxon test showed significant improvement with NOSE score and VAS score in all patients at 1 month and 3 months. Spearman's coefficient showed a positive correlation between the two, though the score improvement and patient satisfaction rate was significantly high with NOSE score. Conclusions: NOSE score and the VAS score both provide effective framework for evaluating treatment responses after septoplasty. However, the NOSE score showed higher improvement and better patient satisfaction rate when used to measure of nasal obstruction as compared to the VAS score.Radhika Hiren ShuklaSanjana Vijay NemadeKiran Jaywant ShindeKeAi Communications Co., Ltd.articleDeviated nasal septumSeptoplastyNOSE scoreVAS scoreOtorhinolaryngologyRF1-547SurgeryRD1-811ENWorld Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vol 6, Iss 1, Pp 53-58 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Deviated nasal septum
Septoplasty
NOSE score
VAS score
Otorhinolaryngology
RF1-547
Surgery
RD1-811
spellingShingle Deviated nasal septum
Septoplasty
NOSE score
VAS score
Otorhinolaryngology
RF1-547
Surgery
RD1-811
Radhika Hiren Shukla
Sanjana Vijay Nemade
Kiran Jaywant Shinde
Comparison of visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) score in evaluation of post septoplasty patients
description Objective: To compare and correlate the efficacy of the NOSE score & the VAS score in determining the symptomatic benefit in patients undergoing septoplasty. Materials and methods: Eighty patients with deviated nasal septum undergoing septoplasty were included in the study. NOSE score & VAS score (out of 100) was documented before and after surgery. Results were correlated and compared statistically. Results: In the NOSE score, the most bothersome symptom was trouble breathing through the nose (85.83); followed by Nasal obstruction or blockage (82.50). Wilcoxon test showed significant improvement with NOSE score and VAS score in all patients at 1 month and 3 months. Spearman's coefficient showed a positive correlation between the two, though the score improvement and patient satisfaction rate was significantly high with NOSE score. Conclusions: NOSE score and the VAS score both provide effective framework for evaluating treatment responses after septoplasty. However, the NOSE score showed higher improvement and better patient satisfaction rate when used to measure of nasal obstruction as compared to the VAS score.
format article
author Radhika Hiren Shukla
Sanjana Vijay Nemade
Kiran Jaywant Shinde
author_facet Radhika Hiren Shukla
Sanjana Vijay Nemade
Kiran Jaywant Shinde
author_sort Radhika Hiren Shukla
title Comparison of visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) score in evaluation of post septoplasty patients
title_short Comparison of visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) score in evaluation of post septoplasty patients
title_full Comparison of visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) score in evaluation of post septoplasty patients
title_fullStr Comparison of visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) score in evaluation of post septoplasty patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) score in evaluation of post septoplasty patients
title_sort comparison of visual analogue scale (vas) and the nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (nose) score in evaluation of post septoplasty patients
publisher KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/c4be90ee79344132bc2bea741bd62b21
work_keys_str_mv AT radhikahirenshukla comparisonofvisualanaloguescalevasandthenasalobstructionsymptomevaluationnosescoreinevaluationofpostseptoplastypatients
AT sanjanavijaynemade comparisonofvisualanaloguescalevasandthenasalobstructionsymptomevaluationnosescoreinevaluationofpostseptoplastypatients
AT kiranjaywantshinde comparisonofvisualanaloguescalevasandthenasalobstructionsymptomevaluationnosescoreinevaluationofpostseptoplastypatients
_version_ 1718383537885806592