RUMINATIVE THINKING IN CHRONIC DEPRESSION: CONCEPT AND VALIDITY OF MEASURES

Despite large amount of empirical evidence in support of rumination as a risk factor of depression onset and chronification, theoretical foundations of ruminative thinking are still being discussed. This includes the issue of so-called constructive, or reflective, ruminations. Objective: This study...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	OLGA D. PUGOVKINA, ANNA D. SYROKVASHINA, MIKHAIL A. ISTOMIN, ALLA B. KHOLMOGOROVA
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	RU
Publicado:	Moscow State University of Psychology and Education 2021
Materias:	rumination chronification depressive disorders cognitive factors fourlevel organization of thinking model coping strategies reflection Psychology BF1-990
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/c4d143513f0144ceb5f8ee5cbe0fbdfd
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:c4d143513f0144ceb5f8ee5cbe0fbdfd
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:c4d143513f0144ceb5f8ee5cbe0fbdfd2021-11-10T16:12:30ZRUMINATIVE THINKING IN CHRONIC DEPRESSION: CONCEPT AND VALIDITY OF MEASURES10.17759/cpp.20212903072075-34702311-9446https://doaj.org/article/c4d143513f0144ceb5f8ee5cbe0fbdfd2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://psyjournals.ru/files/124382/cpp_2021_n3_Pugovkina_et_al.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2075-3470https://doaj.org/toc/2311-9446Despite large amount of empirical evidence in support of rumination as a risk factor of depression onset and chronification, theoretical foundations of ruminative thinking are still being discussed. This includes the issue of so-called constructive, or reflective, ruminations. Objective: This study gives a theoretical review of different views on rumination, empirically tests the idea of constructive and non-constructive ruminative thinking, and tests the validity of the Ruminative Response Scale (RRS, Russian version) [38]. Study design: We conducted a factor analysis of adapted RRS, as well as an intercorrelational analysis of this scale, Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-r), and the COPE Inventory; hypotheses were tested in a general population group (n=476) and two clinical groups (patients with depressive disorders, n=53, and patients with different diagnoses with recent suicide attempts, n=41). Results: Our theoretical review examines ruminative thinking as a dysfunctional coping strategy (E. Watkins) from the perspective of the structural-dynamic model of thinking in the course of creative problem-solving (V. Zaretsky, A. Kholmogorova). Rumination is conceptualized as getting stuck «in a loop» at certain levels of organization of cognitive processes, which substitutes motivation focus on actual problem solving. The resulting four-factor structure of RRS has good psychometric properties and strong correlations with different psychopathological symptoms and dysfunctional coping strategies (namely, psychological and behavioral avoidance and venting negative emotions); these correlations are found in all resulting factors but one, which implies that it may have a special status. Conclusion: The Russian version of RRS shows good preliminary psychometric characteristics and is viable for practical purposes. The idea of constructive rumination discussed in literature has not been confirmed empirically.OLGA D. PUGOVKINAANNA D. SYROKVASHINAMIKHAIL A. ISTOMINALLA B. KHOLMOGOROVAMoscow State University of Psychology and Educationarticleruminationchronificationdepressive disorderscognitive factorsfourlevel organization of thinking modelcoping strategiesreflectionPsychologyBF1-990RUКонсультативная психология и психотерапия, Vol 29, Iss 3, Pp 88-115 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	RU
topic	rumination chronification depressive disorders cognitive factors fourlevel organization of thinking model coping strategies reflection Psychology BF1-990
spellingShingle	rumination chronification depressive disorders cognitive factors fourlevel organization of thinking model coping strategies reflection Psychology BF1-990 OLGA D. PUGOVKINA ANNA D. SYROKVASHINA MIKHAIL A. ISTOMIN ALLA B. KHOLMOGOROVA RUMINATIVE THINKING IN CHRONIC DEPRESSION: CONCEPT AND VALIDITY OF MEASURES
description	Despite large amount of empirical evidence in support of rumination as a risk factor of depression onset and chronification, theoretical foundations of ruminative thinking are still being discussed. This includes the issue of so-called constructive, or reflective, ruminations. Objective: This study gives a theoretical review of different views on rumination, empirically tests the idea of constructive and non-constructive ruminative thinking, and tests the validity of the Ruminative Response Scale (RRS, Russian version) [38]. Study design: We conducted a factor analysis of adapted RRS, as well as an intercorrelational analysis of this scale, Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-r), and the COPE Inventory; hypotheses were tested in a general population group (n=476) and two clinical groups (patients with depressive disorders, n=53, and patients with different diagnoses with recent suicide attempts, n=41). Results: Our theoretical review examines ruminative thinking as a dysfunctional coping strategy (E. Watkins) from the perspective of the structural-dynamic model of thinking in the course of creative problem-solving (V. Zaretsky, A. Kholmogorova). Rumination is conceptualized as getting stuck «in a loop» at certain levels of organization of cognitive processes, which substitutes motivation focus on actual problem solving. The resulting four-factor structure of RRS has good psychometric properties and strong correlations with different psychopathological symptoms and dysfunctional coping strategies (namely, psychological and behavioral avoidance and venting negative emotions); these correlations are found in all resulting factors but one, which implies that it may have a special status. Conclusion: The Russian version of RRS shows good preliminary psychometric characteristics and is viable for practical purposes. The idea of constructive rumination discussed in literature has not been confirmed empirically.
format	article
author	OLGA D. PUGOVKINA ANNA D. SYROKVASHINA MIKHAIL A. ISTOMIN ALLA B. KHOLMOGOROVA
author_facet	OLGA D. PUGOVKINA ANNA D. SYROKVASHINA MIKHAIL A. ISTOMIN ALLA B. KHOLMOGOROVA
author_sort	OLGA D. PUGOVKINA
title	RUMINATIVE THINKING IN CHRONIC DEPRESSION: CONCEPT AND VALIDITY OF MEASURES
title_short	RUMINATIVE THINKING IN CHRONIC DEPRESSION: CONCEPT AND VALIDITY OF MEASURES
title_full	RUMINATIVE THINKING IN CHRONIC DEPRESSION: CONCEPT AND VALIDITY OF MEASURES
title_fullStr	RUMINATIVE THINKING IN CHRONIC DEPRESSION: CONCEPT AND VALIDITY OF MEASURES
title_full_unstemmed	RUMINATIVE THINKING IN CHRONIC DEPRESSION: CONCEPT AND VALIDITY OF MEASURES
title_sort	ruminative thinking in chronic depression: concept and validity of measures
publisher	Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/c4d143513f0144ceb5f8ee5cbe0fbdfd
work_keys_str_mv	AT olgadpugovkina ruminativethinkinginchronicdepressionconceptandvalidityofmeasures AT annadsyrokvashina ruminativethinkinginchronicdepressionconceptandvalidityofmeasures AT mikhailaistomin ruminativethinkinginchronicdepressionconceptandvalidityofmeasures AT allabkholmogorova ruminativethinkinginchronicdepressionconceptandvalidityofmeasures
_version_	1718439916312985600

RUMINATIVE THINKING IN CHRONIC DEPRESSION: CONCEPT AND VALIDITY OF MEASURES

Ejemplares similares