Data acquisition for conservation assessments: is the effort worth it?

When identifying conservation priorities, the accuracy of conservation assessments is constrained by the quality of data available. Despite previous efforts exploring how to deal with imperfect datasets, little is known about how data uncertainty translates into errors in conservation planning outco...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Virgilio Hermoso, Mark J Kennard, Simon Linke
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/c50f1e0492484eb59b3f6b91f449f3ba
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:c50f1e0492484eb59b3f6b91f449f3ba
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:c50f1e0492484eb59b3f6b91f449f3ba2021-11-18T07:51:58ZData acquisition for conservation assessments: is the effort worth it?1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0059662https://doaj.org/article/c50f1e0492484eb59b3f6b91f449f3ba2013-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/23555738/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203When identifying conservation priorities, the accuracy of conservation assessments is constrained by the quality of data available. Despite previous efforts exploring how to deal with imperfect datasets, little is known about how data uncertainty translates into errors in conservation planning outcomes. Here, we evaluate the magnitude of commission and omission error, effectiveness and efficiency of conservation planning outcomes derived from three datasets with increasing data quality. We demonstrate that investing in data acquisition might not always be the best strategy as the magnitude of errors introduced by new sites/species can exceed the benefits gained. There was a trade-off between effectiveness and efficiency due to poorly sampled rare species. Given that data acquisition is limited by the high cost and time required, we recommend focusing on improving the quality of data for those species with the highest level of uncertainty (rare species) when acquiring new data.Virgilio HermosoVirgilio HermosoMark J KennardSimon LinkePublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 8, Iss 3, p e59662 (2013)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Virgilio Hermoso Virgilio Hermoso Mark J Kennard Simon Linke Data acquisition for conservation assessments: is the effort worth it?
description	When identifying conservation priorities, the accuracy of conservation assessments is constrained by the quality of data available. Despite previous efforts exploring how to deal with imperfect datasets, little is known about how data uncertainty translates into errors in conservation planning outcomes. Here, we evaluate the magnitude of commission and omission error, effectiveness and efficiency of conservation planning outcomes derived from three datasets with increasing data quality. We demonstrate that investing in data acquisition might not always be the best strategy as the magnitude of errors introduced by new sites/species can exceed the benefits gained. There was a trade-off between effectiveness and efficiency due to poorly sampled rare species. Given that data acquisition is limited by the high cost and time required, we recommend focusing on improving the quality of data for those species with the highest level of uncertainty (rare species) when acquiring new data.
format	article
author	Virgilio Hermoso Virgilio Hermoso Mark J Kennard Simon Linke
author_facet	Virgilio Hermoso Virgilio Hermoso Mark J Kennard Simon Linke
author_sort	Virgilio Hermoso
title	Data acquisition for conservation assessments: is the effort worth it?
title_short	Data acquisition for conservation assessments: is the effort worth it?
title_full	Data acquisition for conservation assessments: is the effort worth it?
title_fullStr	Data acquisition for conservation assessments: is the effort worth it?
title_full_unstemmed	Data acquisition for conservation assessments: is the effort worth it?
title_sort	data acquisition for conservation assessments: is the effort worth it?
publisher	Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate	2013
url	https://doaj.org/article/c50f1e0492484eb59b3f6b91f449f3ba
work_keys_str_mv	AT virgiliohermoso dataacquisitionforconservationassessmentsistheeffortworthit AT virgiliohermoso dataacquisitionforconservationassessmentsistheeffortworthit AT markjkennard dataacquisitionforconservationassessmentsistheeffortworthit AT simonlinke dataacquisitionforconservationassessmentsistheeffortworthit
_version_	1718422879680331776

Data acquisition for conservation assessments: is the effort worth it?

Ejemplares similares