The place of millet in food globalization during Late Prehistory as evidenced by new bioarchaeological data from the Caucasus

Abstract Two millets, Panicum miliaceum and Setaria italica, were domesticated in northern China, around 6000 BC. Although its oldest evidence is in Asia, possible independent domestication of these species in the Caucasus has often been proposed. To verify this hypothesis, a multiproxy research pro...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lucie Martin, Erwan Messager, Giorgi Bedianashvili, Nana Rusishvili, Elena Lebedeva, Catherine Longford, Roman Hovsepyan, Liana Bitadze, Marine Chkadua, Nikoloz Vanishvili, Françoise Le Mort, Kakha Kakhiani, Mikheil Abramishvili, Giorgi Gogochuri, Bidzina Murvanidze, Gela Giunashvili, Vakhtang Licheli, Aurélie Salavert, Guy Andre, Estelle Herrscher
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/c510ee58a8914fd389c9e5c3704572ee
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:c510ee58a8914fd389c9e5c3704572ee
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:c510ee58a8914fd389c9e5c3704572ee2021-12-02T16:05:54ZThe place of millet in food globalization during Late Prehistory as evidenced by new bioarchaeological data from the Caucasus10.1038/s41598-021-92392-92045-2322https://doaj.org/article/c510ee58a8914fd389c9e5c3704572ee2021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92392-9https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Two millets, Panicum miliaceum and Setaria italica, were domesticated in northern China, around 6000 BC. Although its oldest evidence is in Asia, possible independent domestication of these species in the Caucasus has often been proposed. To verify this hypothesis, a multiproxy research program (Orimil) was designed to detect the first evidence of millet in this region. It included a critical review of the occurrence of archaeological millet in the Caucasus, up to Antiquity; isotopic analyses of human and animal bones and charred grains; and radiocarbon dating of millet grains from archaeological contexts dated from the Early Bronze Age (3500–2500 BC) to the 1st Century BC. The results show that these two cereals were cultivated during the Middle Bronze Age (MBA), around 2000–1800 BC, especially Setaria italica which is the most ancient millet found in Georgia. Isotopic analyses also show a significant enrichment in 13C in human and animal tissues, indicating an increasing C4 plants consumption at the same period. More broadly, our results assert that millet was not present in the Caucasus in the Neolithic period. Its arrival in the region, based on existing data in Eurasia, was from the south, without excluding a possible local domestication of Setaria italica.Lucie MartinErwan MessagerGiorgi BedianashviliNana RusishviliElena LebedevaCatherine LongfordRoman HovsepyanLiana BitadzeMarine ChkaduaNikoloz VanishviliFrançoise Le MortKakha KakhianiMikheil AbramishviliGiorgi GogochuriBidzina MurvanidzeGela GiunashviliVakhtang LicheliAurélie SalavertGuy AndreEstelle HerrscherNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Lucie Martin
Erwan Messager
Giorgi Bedianashvili
Nana Rusishvili
Elena Lebedeva
Catherine Longford
Roman Hovsepyan
Liana Bitadze
Marine Chkadua
Nikoloz Vanishvili
Françoise Le Mort
Kakha Kakhiani
Mikheil Abramishvili
Giorgi Gogochuri
Bidzina Murvanidze
Gela Giunashvili
Vakhtang Licheli
Aurélie Salavert
Guy Andre
Estelle Herrscher
The place of millet in food globalization during Late Prehistory as evidenced by new bioarchaeological data from the Caucasus
description Abstract Two millets, Panicum miliaceum and Setaria italica, were domesticated in northern China, around 6000 BC. Although its oldest evidence is in Asia, possible independent domestication of these species in the Caucasus has often been proposed. To verify this hypothesis, a multiproxy research program (Orimil) was designed to detect the first evidence of millet in this region. It included a critical review of the occurrence of archaeological millet in the Caucasus, up to Antiquity; isotopic analyses of human and animal bones and charred grains; and radiocarbon dating of millet grains from archaeological contexts dated from the Early Bronze Age (3500–2500 BC) to the 1st Century BC. The results show that these two cereals were cultivated during the Middle Bronze Age (MBA), around 2000–1800 BC, especially Setaria italica which is the most ancient millet found in Georgia. Isotopic analyses also show a significant enrichment in 13C in human and animal tissues, indicating an increasing C4 plants consumption at the same period. More broadly, our results assert that millet was not present in the Caucasus in the Neolithic period. Its arrival in the region, based on existing data in Eurasia, was from the south, without excluding a possible local domestication of Setaria italica.
format article
author Lucie Martin
Erwan Messager
Giorgi Bedianashvili
Nana Rusishvili
Elena Lebedeva
Catherine Longford
Roman Hovsepyan
Liana Bitadze
Marine Chkadua
Nikoloz Vanishvili
Françoise Le Mort
Kakha Kakhiani
Mikheil Abramishvili
Giorgi Gogochuri
Bidzina Murvanidze
Gela Giunashvili
Vakhtang Licheli
Aurélie Salavert
Guy Andre
Estelle Herrscher
author_facet Lucie Martin
Erwan Messager
Giorgi Bedianashvili
Nana Rusishvili
Elena Lebedeva
Catherine Longford
Roman Hovsepyan
Liana Bitadze
Marine Chkadua
Nikoloz Vanishvili
Françoise Le Mort
Kakha Kakhiani
Mikheil Abramishvili
Giorgi Gogochuri
Bidzina Murvanidze
Gela Giunashvili
Vakhtang Licheli
Aurélie Salavert
Guy Andre
Estelle Herrscher
author_sort Lucie Martin
title The place of millet in food globalization during Late Prehistory as evidenced by new bioarchaeological data from the Caucasus
title_short The place of millet in food globalization during Late Prehistory as evidenced by new bioarchaeological data from the Caucasus
title_full The place of millet in food globalization during Late Prehistory as evidenced by new bioarchaeological data from the Caucasus
title_fullStr The place of millet in food globalization during Late Prehistory as evidenced by new bioarchaeological data from the Caucasus
title_full_unstemmed The place of millet in food globalization during Late Prehistory as evidenced by new bioarchaeological data from the Caucasus
title_sort place of millet in food globalization during late prehistory as evidenced by new bioarchaeological data from the caucasus
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/c510ee58a8914fd389c9e5c3704572ee
work_keys_str_mv AT luciemartin theplaceofmilletinfoodglobalizationduringlateprehistoryasevidencedbynewbioarchaeologicaldatafromthecaucasus
AT erwanmessager theplaceofmilletinfoodglobalizationduringlateprehistoryasevidencedbynewbioarchaeologicaldatafromthecaucasus
AT giorgibedianashvili theplaceofmilletinfoodglobalizationduringlateprehistoryasevidencedbynewbioarchaeologicaldatafromthecaucasus
AT nanarusishvili theplaceofmilletinfoodglobalizationduringlateprehistoryasevidencedbynewbioarchaeologicaldatafromthecaucasus
AT elenalebedeva theplaceofmilletinfoodglobalizationduringlateprehistoryasevidencedbynewbioarchaeologicaldatafromthecaucasus
AT catherinelongford theplaceofmilletinfoodglobalizationduringlateprehistoryasevidencedbynewbioarchaeologicaldatafromthecaucasus
AT romanhovsepyan theplaceofmilletinfoodglobalizationduringlateprehistoryasevidencedbynewbioarchaeologicaldatafromthecaucasus
AT lianabitadze theplaceofmilletinfoodglobalizationduringlateprehistoryasevidencedbynewbioarchaeologicaldatafromthecaucasus
AT marinechkadua theplaceofmilletinfoodglobalizationduringlateprehistoryasevidencedbynewbioarchaeologicaldatafromthecaucasus
AT nikolozvanishvili theplaceofmilletinfoodglobalizationduringlateprehistoryasevidencedbynewbioarchaeologicaldatafromthecaucasus
AT francoiselemort theplaceofmilletinfoodglobalizationduringlateprehistoryasevidencedbynewbioarchaeologicaldatafromthecaucasus
AT kakhakakhiani theplaceofmilletinfoodglobalizationduringlateprehistoryasevidencedbynewbioarchaeologicaldatafromthecaucasus
AT mikheilabramishvili theplaceofmilletinfoodglobalizationduringlateprehistoryasevidencedbynewbioarchaeologicaldatafromthecaucasus
AT giorgigogochuri theplaceofmilletinfoodglobalizationduringlateprehistoryasevidencedbynewbioarchaeologicaldatafromthecaucasus
AT bidzinamurvanidze theplaceofmilletinfoodglobalizationduringlateprehistoryasevidencedbynewbioarchaeologicaldatafromthecaucasus
AT gelagiunashvili theplaceofmilletinfoodglobalizationduringlateprehistoryasevidencedbynewbioarchaeologicaldatafromthecaucasus
AT vakhtanglicheli theplaceofmilletinfoodglobalizationduringlateprehistoryasevidencedbynewbioarchaeologicaldatafromthecaucasus
AT aureliesalavert theplaceofmilletinfoodglobalizationduringlateprehistoryasevidencedbynewbioarchaeologicaldatafromthecaucasus
AT guyandre theplaceofmilletinfoodglobalizationduringlateprehistoryasevidencedbynewbioarchaeologicaldatafromthecaucasus
AT estelleherrscher theplaceofmilletinfoodglobalizationduringlateprehistoryasevidencedbynewbioarchaeologicaldatafromthecaucasus
AT luciemartin placeofmilletinfoodglobalizationduringlateprehistoryasevidencedbynewbioarchaeologicaldatafromthecaucasus
AT erwanmessager placeofmilletinfoodglobalizationduringlateprehistoryasevidencedbynewbioarchaeologicaldatafromthecaucasus
AT giorgibedianashvili placeofmilletinfoodglobalizationduringlateprehistoryasevidencedbynewbioarchaeologicaldatafromthecaucasus
AT nanarusishvili placeofmilletinfoodglobalizationduringlateprehistoryasevidencedbynewbioarchaeologicaldatafromthecaucasus
AT elenalebedeva placeofmilletinfoodglobalizationduringlateprehistoryasevidencedbynewbioarchaeologicaldatafromthecaucasus
AT catherinelongford placeofmilletinfoodglobalizationduringlateprehistoryasevidencedbynewbioarchaeologicaldatafromthecaucasus
AT romanhovsepyan placeofmilletinfoodglobalizationduringlateprehistoryasevidencedbynewbioarchaeologicaldatafromthecaucasus
AT lianabitadze placeofmilletinfoodglobalizationduringlateprehistoryasevidencedbynewbioarchaeologicaldatafromthecaucasus
AT marinechkadua placeofmilletinfoodglobalizationduringlateprehistoryasevidencedbynewbioarchaeologicaldatafromthecaucasus
AT nikolozvanishvili placeofmilletinfoodglobalizationduringlateprehistoryasevidencedbynewbioarchaeologicaldatafromthecaucasus
AT francoiselemort placeofmilletinfoodglobalizationduringlateprehistoryasevidencedbynewbioarchaeologicaldatafromthecaucasus
AT kakhakakhiani placeofmilletinfoodglobalizationduringlateprehistoryasevidencedbynewbioarchaeologicaldatafromthecaucasus
AT mikheilabramishvili placeofmilletinfoodglobalizationduringlateprehistoryasevidencedbynewbioarchaeologicaldatafromthecaucasus
AT giorgigogochuri placeofmilletinfoodglobalizationduringlateprehistoryasevidencedbynewbioarchaeologicaldatafromthecaucasus
AT bidzinamurvanidze placeofmilletinfoodglobalizationduringlateprehistoryasevidencedbynewbioarchaeologicaldatafromthecaucasus
AT gelagiunashvili placeofmilletinfoodglobalizationduringlateprehistoryasevidencedbynewbioarchaeologicaldatafromthecaucasus
AT vakhtanglicheli placeofmilletinfoodglobalizationduringlateprehistoryasevidencedbynewbioarchaeologicaldatafromthecaucasus
AT aureliesalavert placeofmilletinfoodglobalizationduringlateprehistoryasevidencedbynewbioarchaeologicaldatafromthecaucasus
AT guyandre placeofmilletinfoodglobalizationduringlateprehistoryasevidencedbynewbioarchaeologicaldatafromthecaucasus
AT estelleherrscher placeofmilletinfoodglobalizationduringlateprehistoryasevidencedbynewbioarchaeologicaldatafromthecaucasus
_version_ 1718385174485401600