MANDATORY LABELLING OF NANOFOODS AND THE WTO AGREEMENTS

The labelling of food products that contain new technologies have been carried out to ensure that consumers are well informed on the hazards and uncertainty of the technologies incorporated for food production. Although food labelling is important, the implementation of mandatory labelling measures...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nor Akhmal Hasmin, Zinatul Ashiqin Zainol, Najwa Azizun, Nur Hafidah Abd Kadir
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: UUM Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/c52b86e4bbab439a8db01cb535f232aa
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:c52b86e4bbab439a8db01cb535f232aa
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:c52b86e4bbab439a8db01cb535f232aa2021-11-15T08:24:56ZMANDATORY LABELLING OF NANOFOODS AND THE WTO AGREEMENTS10.32890/jis2020.16.41823-691Xhttps://doaj.org/article/c52b86e4bbab439a8db01cb535f232aa2020-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://e-journal.uum.edu.my/index.php/jis/article/view/jis2020.16.4https://doaj.org/toc/1823-691XThe labelling of food products that contain new technologies have been carried out to ensure that consumers are well informed on the hazards and uncertainty of the technologies incorporated for food production. Although food labelling is important, the implementation of mandatory labelling measures for nanofood within the domestic legislation is only possible if it is aligned with the regulations of the World Trade Organisation (WTO). This study examines the mandatory labelling measure for nanofood that would be permissible under the WTO agreements, i.e. under the Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement and the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement. This study adopted a doctrinal approach and content analysis that examine the relevant legal provisions in the WTO agreements, proceedings conducted by the WTO, and other documents on nanofood labelling. The findings suggest that the labelling measure amounts to unnecessary barriers to international trade. Moreover, mandatory labelling is not an international labelling standard, while the practice of mandatory labelling was found to be trade restrictive. Some recommendations were presented in this study that provide valuable insights on the implementation of mandatory labelling for nanofood if countries decide to introduce this measures into their food information system. Nor Akhmal HasminZinatul Ashiqin ZainolNajwa AzizunNur Hafidah Abd KadirUUM Pressarticlemandatory labellingnanofoodtbt agreementsps agreementbarrier to tradeInternational relationsJZ2-6530ENJournal of International Studies, Vol 16, Pp 59-72 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic mandatory labelling
nanofood
tbt agreement
sps agreement
barrier to trade
International relations
JZ2-6530
spellingShingle mandatory labelling
nanofood
tbt agreement
sps agreement
barrier to trade
International relations
JZ2-6530
Nor Akhmal Hasmin
Zinatul Ashiqin Zainol
Najwa Azizun
Nur Hafidah Abd Kadir
MANDATORY LABELLING OF NANOFOODS AND THE WTO AGREEMENTS
description The labelling of food products that contain new technologies have been carried out to ensure that consumers are well informed on the hazards and uncertainty of the technologies incorporated for food production. Although food labelling is important, the implementation of mandatory labelling measures for nanofood within the domestic legislation is only possible if it is aligned with the regulations of the World Trade Organisation (WTO). This study examines the mandatory labelling measure for nanofood that would be permissible under the WTO agreements, i.e. under the Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement and the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement. This study adopted a doctrinal approach and content analysis that examine the relevant legal provisions in the WTO agreements, proceedings conducted by the WTO, and other documents on nanofood labelling. The findings suggest that the labelling measure amounts to unnecessary barriers to international trade. Moreover, mandatory labelling is not an international labelling standard, while the practice of mandatory labelling was found to be trade restrictive. Some recommendations were presented in this study that provide valuable insights on the implementation of mandatory labelling for nanofood if countries decide to introduce this measures into their food information system.
format article
author Nor Akhmal Hasmin
Zinatul Ashiqin Zainol
Najwa Azizun
Nur Hafidah Abd Kadir
author_facet Nor Akhmal Hasmin
Zinatul Ashiqin Zainol
Najwa Azizun
Nur Hafidah Abd Kadir
author_sort Nor Akhmal Hasmin
title MANDATORY LABELLING OF NANOFOODS AND THE WTO AGREEMENTS
title_short MANDATORY LABELLING OF NANOFOODS AND THE WTO AGREEMENTS
title_full MANDATORY LABELLING OF NANOFOODS AND THE WTO AGREEMENTS
title_fullStr MANDATORY LABELLING OF NANOFOODS AND THE WTO AGREEMENTS
title_full_unstemmed MANDATORY LABELLING OF NANOFOODS AND THE WTO AGREEMENTS
title_sort mandatory labelling of nanofoods and the wto agreements
publisher UUM Press
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/c52b86e4bbab439a8db01cb535f232aa
work_keys_str_mv AT norakhmalhasmin mandatorylabellingofnanofoodsandthewtoagreements
AT zinatulashiqinzainol mandatorylabellingofnanofoodsandthewtoagreements
AT najwaazizun mandatorylabellingofnanofoodsandthewtoagreements
AT nurhafidahabdkadir mandatorylabellingofnanofoodsandthewtoagreements
_version_ 1718428519880458240