Eye-movement study of high- and low-prior-knowledge students’ scientific argumentations with multiple representations

The purpose of this study was to explore how students with high- and low-prior-knowledge employed multiple representations in argumentation evaluation and generation tasks. The argumentation performance and eye-movement behaviors of 96 college students in these tasks were investigated. The number of...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chao-Jung Wu, Chia-Yu Liu
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: American Physical Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/c52cc6af80a744ad9f3f1dae444c19f4
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:c52cc6af80a744ad9f3f1dae444c19f4
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:c52cc6af80a744ad9f3f1dae444c19f42021-12-02T14:22:28ZEye-movement study of high- and low-prior-knowledge students’ scientific argumentations with multiple representations10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.0101252469-9896https://doaj.org/article/c52cc6af80a744ad9f3f1dae444c19f42021-04-01T00:00:00Zhttp://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.010125http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.010125https://doaj.org/toc/2469-9896The purpose of this study was to explore how students with high- and low-prior-knowledge employed multiple representations in argumentation evaluation and generation tasks. The argumentation performance and eye-movement behaviors of 96 college students in these tasks were investigated. The number of participants who proposed complex argumentation levels and the argumentation accuracy was higher in the high-prior-knowledge group than in the low-prior-knowledge group. Moreover, the high-prior-knowledge group demonstrated greater eye-movement transitions between representations compared with the low-prior-knowledge group. Both groups had greater transitions in the generation task than the evaluation tasks. The high-prior-knowledge group distributed attention to representations with more flexibility, revealing that they were more aware of the task requirements and more able to employ multiple representations for arguments. In the argumentation evaluation tasks, the high-prior-knowledge group performed referencing behaviors in the reading sequences between representation text and equation and between representation table and figure, whereas the low-prior-knowledge group was inclined to look back and forth between representation text and table. In the argumentation generation task, the two groups displayed similar reading sequences. It indicated that learners with higher knowledge may perceive the similarity between homogeneous representations and constrained interpretations of the complex representations by using easier representations, or further integrated representations to achieve deeper understanding, which then improved their argumentation performance. The implications of instructions for improving learners’ argumentation skills in a multirepresentational display are discussed.Chao-Jung WuChia-Yu LiuAmerican Physical SocietyarticleSpecial aspects of educationLC8-6691PhysicsQC1-999ENPhysical Review Physics Education Research, Vol 17, Iss 1, p 010125 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Physics
QC1-999
spellingShingle Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Physics
QC1-999
Chao-Jung Wu
Chia-Yu Liu
Eye-movement study of high- and low-prior-knowledge students’ scientific argumentations with multiple representations
description The purpose of this study was to explore how students with high- and low-prior-knowledge employed multiple representations in argumentation evaluation and generation tasks. The argumentation performance and eye-movement behaviors of 96 college students in these tasks were investigated. The number of participants who proposed complex argumentation levels and the argumentation accuracy was higher in the high-prior-knowledge group than in the low-prior-knowledge group. Moreover, the high-prior-knowledge group demonstrated greater eye-movement transitions between representations compared with the low-prior-knowledge group. Both groups had greater transitions in the generation task than the evaluation tasks. The high-prior-knowledge group distributed attention to representations with more flexibility, revealing that they were more aware of the task requirements and more able to employ multiple representations for arguments. In the argumentation evaluation tasks, the high-prior-knowledge group performed referencing behaviors in the reading sequences between representation text and equation and between representation table and figure, whereas the low-prior-knowledge group was inclined to look back and forth between representation text and table. In the argumentation generation task, the two groups displayed similar reading sequences. It indicated that learners with higher knowledge may perceive the similarity between homogeneous representations and constrained interpretations of the complex representations by using easier representations, or further integrated representations to achieve deeper understanding, which then improved their argumentation performance. The implications of instructions for improving learners’ argumentation skills in a multirepresentational display are discussed.
format article
author Chao-Jung Wu
Chia-Yu Liu
author_facet Chao-Jung Wu
Chia-Yu Liu
author_sort Chao-Jung Wu
title Eye-movement study of high- and low-prior-knowledge students’ scientific argumentations with multiple representations
title_short Eye-movement study of high- and low-prior-knowledge students’ scientific argumentations with multiple representations
title_full Eye-movement study of high- and low-prior-knowledge students’ scientific argumentations with multiple representations
title_fullStr Eye-movement study of high- and low-prior-knowledge students’ scientific argumentations with multiple representations
title_full_unstemmed Eye-movement study of high- and low-prior-knowledge students’ scientific argumentations with multiple representations
title_sort eye-movement study of high- and low-prior-knowledge students’ scientific argumentations with multiple representations
publisher American Physical Society
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/c52cc6af80a744ad9f3f1dae444c19f4
work_keys_str_mv AT chaojungwu eyemovementstudyofhighandlowpriorknowledgestudentsscientificargumentationswithmultiplerepresentations
AT chiayuliu eyemovementstudyofhighandlowpriorknowledgestudentsscientificargumentationswithmultiplerepresentations
_version_ 1718391515007418368