The value of quantitative diffusion tensor imaging indices of spinal cord disorders

Abstract Background Different lesions affecting the spinal cord can lead to myelopathy. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is widely used to predict the degree of spinal cord microstructure affection and to assess axonal integrity and diffusion directionality. We hypothesized that not all DTI parameters...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohammad Koriem Mahmoud Omar, Abd El-Karem Hasan Abd Allah, Mona Gouda Maghrabi, Mohamed Zidan Mohamed
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: SpringerOpen 2021
Materias:
MRI
FA
ADC
VR
RA
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/c539bc6f351648be90d97855afaa8713
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:c539bc6f351648be90d97855afaa8713
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:c539bc6f351648be90d97855afaa87132021-11-14T12:27:09ZThe value of quantitative diffusion tensor imaging indices of spinal cord disorders10.1186/s43055-021-00596-w2090-4762https://doaj.org/article/c539bc6f351648be90d97855afaa87132021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-021-00596-whttps://doaj.org/toc/2090-4762Abstract Background Different lesions affecting the spinal cord can lead to myelopathy. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is widely used to predict the degree of spinal cord microstructure affection and to assess axonal integrity and diffusion directionality. We hypothesized that not all DTI parameters have the same affection with different spinal cord pathologies. The purpose of this study is to assess the value of the quantitative diffusion tensor imaging indices in different spinal cord lesions. Results There is highly statistically significant difference of the fractional anisotropy (FA), relative anisotropy (RA), volume ratio (VR) and secondary eigenvector values (E2 and E3) between various studied cord lesions and control levels. There is no statistically significant difference of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and the primary eigenvector value (E1) (ANOVA test). The ROC curve analysis showed the higher sensitivity and accuracy were ‘88% and 62.5%, respectively,’ with FA cutoff value about 0.380. Conclusion The resulted quantitative DTI indices ‘fractional anisotropy, relative anisotropy, volume ratio and secondary eigenvalues’ work as a numerical in vivo marker of overall tissue injury in different pathologies affecting the spinal cord.Mohammad Koriem Mahmoud OmarAbd El-Karem Hasan Abd AllahMona Gouda MaghrabiMohamed Zidan MohamedSpringerOpenarticleMRIDiffusion tensor imagingFAADCVRRAMedical physics. Medical radiology. Nuclear medicineR895-920ENThe Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vol 52, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic MRI
Diffusion tensor imaging
FA
ADC
VR
RA
Medical physics. Medical radiology. Nuclear medicine
R895-920
spellingShingle MRI
Diffusion tensor imaging
FA
ADC
VR
RA
Medical physics. Medical radiology. Nuclear medicine
R895-920
Mohammad Koriem Mahmoud Omar
Abd El-Karem Hasan Abd Allah
Mona Gouda Maghrabi
Mohamed Zidan Mohamed
The value of quantitative diffusion tensor imaging indices of spinal cord disorders
description Abstract Background Different lesions affecting the spinal cord can lead to myelopathy. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is widely used to predict the degree of spinal cord microstructure affection and to assess axonal integrity and diffusion directionality. We hypothesized that not all DTI parameters have the same affection with different spinal cord pathologies. The purpose of this study is to assess the value of the quantitative diffusion tensor imaging indices in different spinal cord lesions. Results There is highly statistically significant difference of the fractional anisotropy (FA), relative anisotropy (RA), volume ratio (VR) and secondary eigenvector values (E2 and E3) between various studied cord lesions and control levels. There is no statistically significant difference of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and the primary eigenvector value (E1) (ANOVA test). The ROC curve analysis showed the higher sensitivity and accuracy were ‘88% and 62.5%, respectively,’ with FA cutoff value about 0.380. Conclusion The resulted quantitative DTI indices ‘fractional anisotropy, relative anisotropy, volume ratio and secondary eigenvalues’ work as a numerical in vivo marker of overall tissue injury in different pathologies affecting the spinal cord.
format article
author Mohammad Koriem Mahmoud Omar
Abd El-Karem Hasan Abd Allah
Mona Gouda Maghrabi
Mohamed Zidan Mohamed
author_facet Mohammad Koriem Mahmoud Omar
Abd El-Karem Hasan Abd Allah
Mona Gouda Maghrabi
Mohamed Zidan Mohamed
author_sort Mohammad Koriem Mahmoud Omar
title The value of quantitative diffusion tensor imaging indices of spinal cord disorders
title_short The value of quantitative diffusion tensor imaging indices of spinal cord disorders
title_full The value of quantitative diffusion tensor imaging indices of spinal cord disorders
title_fullStr The value of quantitative diffusion tensor imaging indices of spinal cord disorders
title_full_unstemmed The value of quantitative diffusion tensor imaging indices of spinal cord disorders
title_sort value of quantitative diffusion tensor imaging indices of spinal cord disorders
publisher SpringerOpen
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/c539bc6f351648be90d97855afaa8713
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadkoriemmahmoudomar thevalueofquantitativediffusiontensorimagingindicesofspinalcorddisorders
AT abdelkaremhasanabdallah thevalueofquantitativediffusiontensorimagingindicesofspinalcorddisorders
AT monagoudamaghrabi thevalueofquantitativediffusiontensorimagingindicesofspinalcorddisorders
AT mohamedzidanmohamed thevalueofquantitativediffusiontensorimagingindicesofspinalcorddisorders
AT mohammadkoriemmahmoudomar valueofquantitativediffusiontensorimagingindicesofspinalcorddisorders
AT abdelkaremhasanabdallah valueofquantitativediffusiontensorimagingindicesofspinalcorddisorders
AT monagoudamaghrabi valueofquantitativediffusiontensorimagingindicesofspinalcorddisorders
AT mohamedzidanmohamed valueofquantitativediffusiontensorimagingindicesofspinalcorddisorders
_version_ 1718429254222348288