Urban flood risk analysis of buildings using HEC-RAS 2D in climate change framework

The present study aims to assess flood depth, building risk analysis, and the effectiveness of various flood adaptation strategies to attenuate building risk caused by urban floods in climate change scenarios. A framework is proposed where a hydraulic model, Hydrologic Engineering Center's-Rive...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: R. Madhuri, Y. S. L. Sarath Raja, K. Srinivasa Raju, Bonagiri Sai Punith, Kondisetti Manoj
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: IWA Publishing 2021
Materias:
rcp
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/c5538138698a45bc9098a577f4ddc7ab
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:c5538138698a45bc9098a577f4ddc7ab
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:c5538138698a45bc9098a577f4ddc7ab2021-11-08T07:59:25ZUrban flood risk analysis of buildings using HEC-RAS 2D in climate change framework2616-651810.2166/h2oj.2021.111https://doaj.org/article/c5538138698a45bc9098a577f4ddc7ab2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://doi.org/10.2166/h2oj.2021.111https://doaj.org/toc/2616-6518The present study aims to assess flood depth, building risk analysis, and the effectiveness of various flood adaptation strategies to attenuate building risk caused by urban floods in climate change scenarios. A framework is proposed where a hydraulic model, Hydrologic Engineering Center's-River Analysis System 2D (HEC-RAS 2D), is applied for 2-dimensional flood modeling to estimate (a) submerged areas, (b) flood depth, and (c) building risk for extreme events corresponding to two representative concentration pathways (RCPs), 6.0 and 8.5. Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC), India, is chosen for demonstration. Percentages of buildings in GHMC under high, medium, and low risks for RCP 6.0 are 38.19, 9.91, and 51.9% in the respective order, and these are 40.82, 10.55, and 48.63% for RCP 8.5. Six flood proofing (FP) strategies (S1–S6) are proposed for attenuating building risk along with the required capital cost. The capital investment required for FP to achieve the ideal situation of no risk for all buildings (strategy S6) works out to Rs. 3,740 × 107 and Rs. 3,800 × 107 for RCPs 6.0 and 8.5. It is observed that the effect of adaptation strategies is significant. HIGHLIGHTS Generation of flood inundation maps using Hydrologic Engineering Center's-River Analysis System 2D (HEC-RAS 2D) for the urban catchment of GHMC under two representative concentration pathways (RCPs).; Building risk analysis and formulation of adaptation strategies under two RCPs.;R. MadhuriY. S. L. Sarath RajaK. Srinivasa RajuBonagiri Sai PunithKondisetti ManojIWA Publishingarticlebuilding risk analysisclimate changeflood depth analysisflood proofinghec-ras 2drcpRiver, lake, and water-supply engineering (General)TC401-506Water supply for domestic and industrial purposesTD201-500ENH2Open Journal, Vol 4, Iss 1, Pp 262-275 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic building risk analysis
climate change
flood depth analysis
flood proofing
hec-ras 2d
rcp
River, lake, and water-supply engineering (General)
TC401-506
Water supply for domestic and industrial purposes
TD201-500
spellingShingle building risk analysis
climate change
flood depth analysis
flood proofing
hec-ras 2d
rcp
River, lake, and water-supply engineering (General)
TC401-506
Water supply for domestic and industrial purposes
TD201-500
R. Madhuri
Y. S. L. Sarath Raja
K. Srinivasa Raju
Bonagiri Sai Punith
Kondisetti Manoj
Urban flood risk analysis of buildings using HEC-RAS 2D in climate change framework
description The present study aims to assess flood depth, building risk analysis, and the effectiveness of various flood adaptation strategies to attenuate building risk caused by urban floods in climate change scenarios. A framework is proposed where a hydraulic model, Hydrologic Engineering Center's-River Analysis System 2D (HEC-RAS 2D), is applied for 2-dimensional flood modeling to estimate (a) submerged areas, (b) flood depth, and (c) building risk for extreme events corresponding to two representative concentration pathways (RCPs), 6.0 and 8.5. Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC), India, is chosen for demonstration. Percentages of buildings in GHMC under high, medium, and low risks for RCP 6.0 are 38.19, 9.91, and 51.9% in the respective order, and these are 40.82, 10.55, and 48.63% for RCP 8.5. Six flood proofing (FP) strategies (S1–S6) are proposed for attenuating building risk along with the required capital cost. The capital investment required for FP to achieve the ideal situation of no risk for all buildings (strategy S6) works out to Rs. 3,740 × 107 and Rs. 3,800 × 107 for RCPs 6.0 and 8.5. It is observed that the effect of adaptation strategies is significant. HIGHLIGHTS Generation of flood inundation maps using Hydrologic Engineering Center's-River Analysis System 2D (HEC-RAS 2D) for the urban catchment of GHMC under two representative concentration pathways (RCPs).; Building risk analysis and formulation of adaptation strategies under two RCPs.;
format article
author R. Madhuri
Y. S. L. Sarath Raja
K. Srinivasa Raju
Bonagiri Sai Punith
Kondisetti Manoj
author_facet R. Madhuri
Y. S. L. Sarath Raja
K. Srinivasa Raju
Bonagiri Sai Punith
Kondisetti Manoj
author_sort R. Madhuri
title Urban flood risk analysis of buildings using HEC-RAS 2D in climate change framework
title_short Urban flood risk analysis of buildings using HEC-RAS 2D in climate change framework
title_full Urban flood risk analysis of buildings using HEC-RAS 2D in climate change framework
title_fullStr Urban flood risk analysis of buildings using HEC-RAS 2D in climate change framework
title_full_unstemmed Urban flood risk analysis of buildings using HEC-RAS 2D in climate change framework
title_sort urban flood risk analysis of buildings using hec-ras 2d in climate change framework
publisher IWA Publishing
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/c5538138698a45bc9098a577f4ddc7ab
work_keys_str_mv AT rmadhuri urbanfloodriskanalysisofbuildingsusinghecras2dinclimatechangeframework
AT yslsarathraja urbanfloodriskanalysisofbuildingsusinghecras2dinclimatechangeframework
AT ksrinivasaraju urbanfloodriskanalysisofbuildingsusinghecras2dinclimatechangeframework
AT bonagirisaipunith urbanfloodriskanalysisofbuildingsusinghecras2dinclimatechangeframework
AT kondisettimanoj urbanfloodriskanalysisofbuildingsusinghecras2dinclimatechangeframework
_version_ 1718442850074492928