Entre gestion sociale et gestion sécuritaire du sans-abrisme : l’exemple d’une recherche ethnographique à Nancy
Based on a post-doctoral ethnographic research conducted between 2017 and 2019 in Nancy, this contribution shows how the "homeless issue" should be jointly treated with social and safety perspectives in the context of local political action. By adopting a sociology of institutional uses of...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN FR |
| Publicado: |
Université des Sciences et Technologies de Lille
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/c579c5c0f534414d95fa77d7d9361789 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | Based on a post-doctoral ethnographic research conducted between 2017 and 2019 in Nancy, this contribution shows how the "homeless issue" should be jointly treated with social and safety perspectives in the context of local political action. By adopting a sociology of institutional uses of sociology point of view, it seems that far from being opposed, these two logics of solving a problem that is both social (or even humanitarian) and security - or eco-sanitary - are in fact complementary for the actors in charge of this issue. Therefore, it seems that the "dissuasive city" and the "city of solidarity" should not be approached as empirical realities that define this or that city, but rather as logics of public action which, far from being opposed and contradictory, constitute complementary approaches. It would even appear that the socio-political framework of contemporary social action favor this duality of political action regarding the social issue. |
|---|